[slightly delayed, as I just realised that I still had this in drafts
for some reason]
On Sun, 2020-09-20 at 21:26 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 20/09/2020 10:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 25/07/2020 12:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Unfortunately it appears that this
On 20/09/2020 10:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 25/07/2020 12:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 13:26 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 22/07/2020 13:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
So I have gone with the minimal backport to 2.44.10 instead
On 25/07/2020 12:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 13:26 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 22/07/2020 13:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> So I have gone with the minimal backport to 2.44.10 instead (which
>>> I've also tested) and it's already uploaded.
Hi,
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 13:26 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 22/07/2020 13:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > So I have gone with the minimal backport to 2.44.10 instead (which
> > I've also tested) and it's already uploaded. debdiff attached.
>
> Attached for real now.
On 22/07/2020 13:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> So I have gone with the minimal backport to 2.44.10 instead (which I've
> also tested) and it's already uploaded. debdiff attached.
Attached for real now.
Emilio
diff -Nru librsvg-2.44.10/debian/changelog librsvg-2.44.10/debian/changelog
---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
This update fixes CVE-2019-20446, which the Security Team marked as
no-dsa. I considered updating to 2.44.16, which has a sensible set
of changes to the librsvg code.
6 matches
Mail list logo
