Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols

2020-07-24 Thread Benjamin Barenblat
On Friday, July 24, 2020, at 2:58 PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > When the soname of the library encodes the exact upstream > version as abseil does, there are exactly zero benefits > of using a symbols - every update of abseil will be a > library transition in any case. Makes sense. I was hoping

Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols

2020-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: abseil Version: 0~20200225.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=abseil=sid ... dh_makeshlibs -a dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns