Hi Bastian,
Am Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:51:28PM +0100 schrieb Bastian Germann:
> Control: unblock 967491 by 967514
>
> I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/5 in order to get rid of the optional
> gtkglext,
> which is going to be autoremoved.
Thanks a lot for the info and even more your work on this.
Control: unblock 967491 by 967514
I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/5 in order to get rid of the optional gtkglext,
which is going to be autoremoved.diff -Nru gwyddion-2.63/debian/changelog gwyddion-2.63/debian/changelog
--- gwyddion-2.63/debian/changelog 2023-07-12 13:20:43.0 +
++
Am Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 02:37:56PM +0100 schrieb David Nečas (Yeti):
> At some point in medium-term horizon we plan to break everything and
> switch to GTK+3. However, I expect it will be deprecated by then
> everything in Debian will be expected to port to GTK+6, or quantum
> wearables, or somethi
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 01:06:51PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> according to upstream in a previous bug report[1]:
>
>There is no way to port to GTK+3 without breaking backward
>compatibility. We value backward compatibility.
>
> I keep upstream in CC to inform them that while the previ
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Hi,
according to upstream in a previous bug report[1]:
There is no way to port to GTK+3 without breaking backward
compatibility. We value backward compatibility.
I keep upstream in CC to inform them that while the previous situation
was not yet a reason to remove
5 matches
Mail list logo