Am 07.09.20 um 20:52 schrieb Colm Buckley:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 246.4-1~bpo10+1
> Followup-For: Bug #969599
>
> Hey folks -
>
> I had a productive conversation with one of the upstream authors at
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/16719;
> we think we have found the root cause
Package: systemd
Version: 246.4-1~bpo10+1
Followup-For: Bug #969599
Hey folks -
I had a productive conversation with one of the upstream authors at
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/16719;
we think we have found the root cause of this issue. A new version of the
upstream PR is being mer
The PR referenced earlier does ameliorate the issue; however I don't think
it's a complete fix, as there are worrying messages in the debug log, and
there is still nonzero packet loss. I will follow up with upstream.
I would encourage Debian users to remain with systemd 245, and not to
migrate thi
That PR patches cleanly against the Debian source; so I'm building a local
package version now to test.
Will follow up here and with upstream.
Colm
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 20:48, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Colm Buckley:
> > Package: systemd
> > Version: 246.4-1~bpo10+1
Am 05.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Colm Buckley:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 246.4-1~bpo10+1
> Severity: important
> Tags: ipv6
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
Package: systemd
Version: 246.4-1~bpo10+1
Severity: important
Tags: ipv6
Dear Maintainer,
6 matches
Mail list logo