Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-11-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2020-11-28 Rob Browning wrote: > Andreas Metzler writes: [...] > I also wonder if it could be something we're setting in the debian/rules > environment, since the tests work fine if I run: > make -C b4deb check > after the debian/rules build hangs and I C-c it. Hello, It is not

Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-11-27 Thread Rob Browning
Andreas Metzler writes: > Abovementioned reproducer works on amd64. I can reproduce it now, but before I spend too much time trying to track it down, is it a requirement that debian packages be able to build and test in /dev/shm? I'll be a little surprised if that's feasible for all our

Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-11-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2020-11-25 Rob Browning wrote: > Andreas Metzler writes: >> I think I have described how to reproduce this on amd64 in the other >> bugreport: >> (sid)ametzler@argenau:/$ rm -rf /tmp/GNUTLS/ /dev/shm/GNUTLS >> (sid)ametzler@argenau:/$ mkdir /tmp/GNUTLS/ /dev/shm/GNUTLS >>

Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-11-25 Thread Rob Browning
Andreas Metzler writes: > I think I have described how to reproduce this on amd64 in the other > bugreport: > > (sid)ametzler@argenau:/$ rm -rf /tmp/GNUTLS/ /dev/shm/GNUTLS > (sid)ametzler@argenau:/$ mkdir /tmp/GNUTLS/ /dev/shm/GNUTLS > (sid)ametzler@argenau:/$ cd /dev/shm/GNUTLS >

Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-11-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2020-11-24 Rob Browning wrote: > Hmm, didn't see this until now (don't think I received a mail from the > bug tracker). > Andreas Metzler writes: >> a full build fails reproducibly for me when building in /dev/shm. > Building in /dev/shm? And on what architecture, etc. >> I did a test

Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-11-24 Thread Rob Browning
Hmm, didn't see this until now (don't think I received a mail from the bug tracker). > Andreas Metzler writes: > a full build fails reproducibly for me when building in /dev/shm. Building in /dev/shm? And on what architecture, etc. > I did a test upload to experimental yesterday, it also

Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-10-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2020-10-03 Rob Browning wrote: > Andreas Metzler writes: > > I would love to, but guile-3.0 >= 3.0.4-1+b1 seems to be broken. See > > 969640. > Assuming I did it right (guile-3.0-dev was installed along with all > the other build deps, and guile-2.2-dev wasn't), a "fakeroot > debian/rules

Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-10-03 Thread Rob Browning
Andreas Metzler writes: > I would love to, but guile-3.0 >= 3.0.4-1+b1 seems to be broken. See > 969640. Assuming I did it right (guile-3.0-dev was installed along with all the other build deps, and guile-2.2-dev wasn't), a "fakeroot debian/rules binary" just built without trouble here using

Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

2020-09-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: reassign 969672 guile-gnutls Control: forcemerge 964284 969672 On 2020-09-06 Rob Browning wrote: > Source: gnutls28 > Severity: wishlist > Please migrate to guile-3.0 as soon as it's feasible. If we can, I'd > like to have the option to drop guile-2.2 from bullseye, so that we > won't