Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2024-07-29 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Santiago, My reproducibility testing framework on my local machine is crusty enough that testing an arbitrary Git repo is actually quite difficult. I should probably work on this sometime, but there hasn't been enough call for me to fix that. Could you simply go ahead with the upload of

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2024-07-28 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello. This is an old bug for which I still don't have a fix. I wonder if you would have some time to look at this and propose a patch (preferably by email). I have to make a release in the following days to fix the build with gcc-14. If I can also fix this bug, the better. The package is

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2023-02-07 Thread Santiago Vila
El 7/2/23 a las 22:30, Chris Lamb escribió: As to why it remains unreproducible on i386 today, I can't immediately see why that is happening. But I don't think it's related to the rationale I gave above. I therefore think keeping this "- patch" and "+ moreinfo" is correct. Seems fair to me.

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2023-02-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Santiago Vila wrote: > Hi. To summarize: I'd appreciate a more detailed explanation about why > the patch is needed (if it's needed at all at this point). Hm, the difficulty here is that the packaging and the surrounding toolchain has changed quite a bit since we filed this bug, and we don't

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2023-01-24 Thread Santiago Vila
tags 970278 + moreinfo tags 970278 - patch thanks Hi. To summarize: I'd appreciate a more detailed explanation about why the patch is needed (if it's needed at all at this point). Note: I have just switched to dh, which means the build now uses dh_strip_nondeterminism (I guess this always

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2023-01-23 Thread Santiago Vila
Sorry, I said: According to this page: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/smartlist.html the package is already reproducible. Am I missing anything? Ok, it's reproducible only in bullseye, bookworm and unstable on amd64, and not reproducible on i386. But I

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2023-01-23 Thread Santiago Vila
El 14/9/20 a las 11:54, Chris Lamb escribió: Source: smartlist Version: 3.15-25 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: environment X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2020-12-13 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 05:52:03PM -, Chris Lamb wrote: > Chris Lamb wrote: > > > Source: smartlist > > Version: 3.15-23 > > Tags: patch > > Gentle ping on the above? I'm not interested in working on reproducible issues anymore (including accepting patches) as far as there are any packages

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2020-12-13 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: smartlist > Version: 3.15-23 > Tags: patch Gentle ping on the above? Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#970278: smartlist: please make the build reproducible

2020-09-14 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: smartlist Version: 3.15-25 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: environment X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that smartlist could not be built