control: tag -1 + pending
Hello,
On Mon 09 Nov 2020 at 12:12PM +01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 01:01:28PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
>> index 0d7a3e9..a21a510 100644
>> --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rs
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 12:12:18PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 01:01:28PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> > index 0d7a3e9..a21a510 100644
> > --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> > +++ b/policy/ch-cont
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 01:01:28PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> index 0d7a3e9..a21a510 100644
> --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> @@ -552,8 +552,7 @@ The three components here are:
>
> `
control: tag -1 + patch
Hello,
On Wed 30 Sep 2020 at 11:23AM +02, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2020-09-29 02:22, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Technically superfluous but I think helpful to the reader, so I suggest
>> we just keep it.
>
> To be honest, as a reader, I found that to be the opposite. The
Hello,
On Sat 26 Sep 2020 at 02:48pm +02, Christian Kastner wrote:
> with regards to colons in version numbers, 5.6.12 states on the "epoch"
> fragment:
>
> "If it is omitted then the upstream_version may not contain any colons."
>
>
> However, this seems superfluous, as it states on the "upstrea
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.0.3
Severity: minor
Hi,
with regards to colons in version numbers, 5.6.12 states on the "epoch"
fragment:
"If it is omitted then the upstream_version may not contain any colons."
However, this seems superfluous, as it states on the "upstream_version"
fragmen
6 matches
Mail list logo
