On 27/10 16:20, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> I've just been given out the access on salsa. Ready to welcome
> testinfra :)
Done:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/testinfra
Cheers,
--
Seb
Hi Sébastien,
On 10/26/20 8:09 AM, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> On 23/10 17:11, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
>> Sure. I initially suggested debian because I'm not in the python
>> team. I guess that will be the opportunity to join in :)
>
> All right; can you let me know once you've joined, and then w
On 23/10 17:11, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> Sure. I initially suggested debian because I'm not in the python
> team. I guess that will be the opportunity to join in :)
All right; can you let me know once you've joined, and then we can see
about transferring it there?
Cheers,
--
Seb
On 10/23/20 9:25 AM, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
On 15/10 09:30, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
From what I can see on the package tracker, testinfra hasn't been very
active packaging wise. No source upload have been done and the package
hasn't migrated to testing, since 2019.
I do believe that having
On 15/10 09:30, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> From what I can see on the package tracker, testinfra hasn't been very
> active packaging wise. No source upload have been done and the package
> hasn't migrated to testing, since 2019.
>
> I do believe that having testinfra in a Debian stable release wou
X-Debbugs-CC: mat...@debian.org
Dear maintainers,
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:47:14 +0300 George Shuklin
wrote:
> Current upstream version of testinfra is 5.3, and there aren't any breaking
> changes compare to 3.2.
> Please, consider upgrading it.
From what I can see on the package tracker, testinf
Package: testinfra
Version: 3.2.0-1
Current upstream version of testinfra is 5.3, and there aren't any breaking
changes compare to 3.2.
Please, consider upgrading it.
Thanks!
7 matches
Mail list logo
