On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 08:34:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Would you still find it relevant to pin the old font even if the new one
> works but simply uses different visual style?
Yes. I find the new one fairly unreadable as a terminal font.
> Source for Debian package is
Quoting Steinar H. Gunderson (2020-11-10 20:08:14)
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 07:46:55PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Why the severity?
> >
> > Visual changes does not seem reason release-critical to me.
> >
> > "completely broken" need more than a vague suspicion, IMHO.
>
> Feel free to
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 07:46:55PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Why the severity?
>
> Visual changes does not seem reason release-critical to me.
>
> "completely broken" need more than a vague suspicion, IMHO.
Feel free to downgrade. The background for the severity: I installed the
package
Hi Steinar,
Quoting Steinar H. Gunderson (2020-11-10 18:42:02)
> Package: fonts-noto-mono
> Version: 20201027-3
> Severity: grave
Why the severity?
Visual changes does not seem reason release-critical to me.
"completely broken" need more than a vague suspicion, IMHO.
> For unknown reasons,
4 matches
Mail list logo
