tags 974724 + wontfix
thanks
Hi
> And who decided to put dozens of separate tools into monster packages?
That was a decision back 15 years ago on debian-devel, where I asked
whether we should package each TeX Live package into a single Debian
package or make groups according to the collections
Hallo,
* Norbert Preining [Thu, Nov 26 2020, 01:41:15PM]:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2020, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > First, in former times it was easy to find pdfjam because the package
>
> Yes, but now it is part of the TeX Live group and we cannot include the
> long description of every single included TeX
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> First, in former times it was easy to find pdfjam because the package
Yes, but now it is part of the TeX Live group and we cannot include the
long description of every single included TeX package in the long
description of the Debian package, it would
Package: texlive-extra-utils
Version: 2020.20200925-1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/pdfjam/pdfjam
Hi,
reporting this as minor here because the usability is severely impacted.
First, in former times it was easy to find pdfjam because the package
description
4 matches
Mail list logo
