Hi Dave,
On 04-12-2020 15:23, Dave Steele wrote:
> Could you lift the block now? There is a version submitted that passes
> all autopkgtests.
Ack.
> Note that the block did not stop the tests from running (which passed).
Yes, because I lifted the blocklist. I wanted to prevent a broken
package
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:51 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Happens. Glad you're able to point us at the problem so quickly. I have
> blocklisted todo.txt-base already yesterday, so the infrastructure is
> somewhat protected now. I'll lift the block once you close this bug.
>
>
Could you lift the bloc
Hi David,
On 30-11-2020 17:05, David Steele wrote:
> All works well, until you test the new version of one package along with
> the old version of the other. In one scenario there is a recursion, where
> topydo ends up calling itself via the alternatives hook.
Ack. That's probably what we're seei
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 3:51 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: topydo
> Version: 0.13-3
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: issue
>
> Dear David,
>
> I have no idea what's happening, but currently we have multiple workers
> (
Source: topydo
Version: 0.13-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: issue
Dear David,
I have no idea what's happening, but currently we have multiple workers
(on different architectures) off-line on the ci.debian.net
infrastructure.
5 matches
Mail list logo
