Hello,
because one user might want to increase the optimization level with a
particular dpkg build flag, so supporting them both won't hurt too much.
Having an optional symbol is retro-compatible with the current status quo of
the package.
What do you think?
G.
Il venerdì 11 dicembre
Hey,
> Hello, when built with -O3, some symbols are disappearing on s390x.
> Is it possible to mark them as optional?
I'm happy to merge this patch, but please explain first, why this would improve
the package? From my side it looks like this:
The buildds are happy with s390x symbols[1], so why
Source: libkolabxml
Version: 1.2.0-1
Tags: patch
Severity: important
Hello, when built with -O3, some symbols are disappearing on s390x.
Is it possible to mark them as optional?
--- libkolabxml-1.2.0/debian/libkolabxml1v5.symbols 2020-12-01
22:09:37.0 +0100
+++
3 matches
Mail list logo
