Am 12.12.20 um 10:12 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
On 11/12/20 at 15:08 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd-bootchart/pull/37
specifically
https://github.com/systemd/systemd-bootchart/pull/37/commits/65320230f5fcb02e81df5131a4dc03092558c263
Could you give this PR a try?
On 11/12/20 at 15:08 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.12.20 um 09:09 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > On 10/12/20 at 22:12 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> > > > Hi Michael!
> > > >
> > > > On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > >
Am 11.12.20 um 09:09 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
On 10/12/20 at 22:12 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Testsuite
On 11/12/20 at 13:45 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.12.20 um 09:26 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > I tried to reproduce this on another system (ARM64, 256 visible cores
> > because 2 x ThunderX2, 32 cores/cpu, 4 threads/core) and it also
> > segfaults.
> >
> > I tried to reproduce on yet another
On 11/12/20 at 13:42 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.12.20 um 09:09 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > 0x00014d04 in svg_ps_bars (interval=,
> > graph_start=2775.3698308829998, ps_first=0x1000505d0, n_cpus=1,
> > n_samples=10, head=0x100050770, of=0x1000503f0) at src/svg.c:1187
>
>
Am 11.12.20 um 09:26 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
I tried to reproduce this on another system (ARM64, 256 visible cores
because 2 x ThunderX2, 32 cores/cpu, 4 threads/core) and it also
segfaults.
I tried to reproduce on yet another system (x86_64, 128 visible cores
because 4x Intel Xeon Gold 6130,
Am 11.12.20 um 09:09 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
0x00014d04 in svg_ps_bars (interval=,
graph_start=2775.3698308829998, ps_first=0x1000505d0, n_cpus=1,
n_samples=10, head=0x100050770, of=0x1000503f0) at src/svg.c:1187
looking at n_cpus=1,
what's the output of /proc/schedstat?
On 10/12/20 at 22:12 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> > Hi Michael!
> >
> > On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > >
> > > Testsuite summary for
On 11/12/20 at 09:09 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 10/12/20 at 22:12 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> > > Hi Michael!
> > >
> > > On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > >
Hi,
On 10/12/20 at 22:16 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 12/10/20 10:12 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores?
> >
> > No idea
>
> I just checked plummer.debian.org and it has only 16 (virtual) CPUs.
>
> Would be curious
On 12/10/20 10:16 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores?
>>
>> No idea
>
> But given that there is only a single test, I wonder if that is really
> relevant anyway.
You're right. That's rather strange. Hmm.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian
Am 10.12.20 um 22:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233
Hi!
On 12/10/20 10:12 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores?
>
> No idea
I just checked plummer.debian.org and it has only 16 (virtual) CPUs.
Would be curious to hear whether Lucas' test machine had >= 160 CPUs.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul
Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233
>
> # TOTAL: 1
> # PASS: 1
> # SKIP: 0
Am 10.12.20 um 20:18 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the issue on a porter box (plummer).
So I'm not sure if I can do something about it.
It might be an issue with parallel jobs as Lucas built the
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the issue on a porter box (plummer).
> So I'm not sure if I can do something about it.
It might be an issue with parallel jobs as Lucas built the package with
make -j160 and some packages can't cope with
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
Hello Lucas
Am 09.12.20 um 09:42 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
Source: systemd-bootchart
Version: 233-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el
Hi,
During a rebuild of all
Source: systemd-bootchart
Version: 233-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on
19 matches
Mail list logo
