Hi Markus,
Thanks for following-up. It further clarified pieces.
On 06-04-2023 15:14, Markus Koschany wrote:
I always rebuild all reverse-dependencies with ratt before I upload a Java
library package. From my Java experience I know this uncovers almost all
problems. Rhino is not some obscure
Hi,
On 06-04-2023 14:50, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5
Please find the debdiffs attached.
Go ahead
Thanks, I have rescheduled dojo to 0 days and it got accepted.
Paul
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, dem 06.04.2023 um 12:54 +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 16:26:00 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
> > 1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected by the
> > new
> > rhino version.
>
> I'm wondering how you know, did you test
Le jeu. 6 avr. 2023 à 11:24, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
> Control: tags -1 pending patch
>
> On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5
>
> Please find the debdiffs attached.
Go ahead
>
> Paul
> --
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
Control: tags -1 pending patch
On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5
Please find the debdiffs attached.
Paul
diff -Nru rhino-1.7.14/debian/changelog rhino-1.7.14/debian/changelog
--- rhino-1.7.14/debian/changelog
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 16:26:00 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected by the new
rhino version.
I'm wondering how you know, did you test (without rebuilding) all the
reverse dependencies? If so, how did you do that? (I'm worried
Le dim. 26 mars 2023 à 21:39, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Hi Graham,
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 26.03.2023 um 19:28 +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > Hi Markus
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:34, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > > 1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected
> by the
Hi Graham,
Am Sonntag, dem 26.03.2023 um 19:28 +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> Hi Markus
>
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:34, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > 1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected by the
> > new
> > rhino version.
> How did you determine this?
Rhino
Hi Markus
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:34, Markus Koschany wrote:
> 1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected by the
> new
> rhino version.
How did you determine this?
> 2. shrinksafe has no reverse-dependencies
That is true, but src:dojo has ledgersmb and tt-rss as
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 09:41:48 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote:
[...]
> To both the rhino and dojo maintainers, please investigate so we can
> have this resolved for bookworm.
Here are my investigations:
1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected by the new
rhino
Control: reassign -1 src:rhino, src:dojo
Control: found -1 rhino/ 1.7.14-1
Control: found -1 dojo/ 1.17.2+dfsg1-2
It appears that dojo needs to be rebuilt against the new rhino, and
rebuilding dojo against the new rhino makes it incompatible with the
old rhino.
The changes that the new rhino
Hi,
On Wed, 01 Mar 2023 09:58:14 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
> I'm not able to reproduce the autopkgtest failure locally running in
> clean sid chroots.
On ci.debian.net, the tests also fail in unstable.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dojo/
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP
Hi tony,
[...]
> I'm not able to reproduce the autopkgtest failure locally running in
> clean sid chroots. First, I build the dojo source package and ran the
> autopkgtest against those binaries. When that didn't fail, I pulled the
> binary packages from the archive and ran the autopkgtest
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:13:35PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 shrinksafe
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> I uploaded a new version of rhino a while ago and it seems this bug is still
> relevant. I have rebuilt dojo with rhino 1.7.14 and all shrinksafe tests pass.
>
Control: reassign -1 shrinksafe
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
I uploaded a new version of rhino a while ago and it seems this bug is still
relevant. I have rebuilt dojo with rhino 1.7.14 and all shrinksafe tests pass.
However the same tests fail with autopkgtest and block the migration of
Hi Emmanuel,
On 16-12-2020 16:47, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> Le 15/12/2020 à 20:49, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
>> Unfortunately, there hasn't been any activity on this bug accept for bug
>> manipulation. rhino is a key package, so is not going to be autoremoved.
>> Let's fix this before
Hi Paul
Le 15/12/2020 à 20:49, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Unfortunately, there hasn't been any activity on this bug accept for bug
> manipulation. rhino is a key package, so is not going to be autoremoved.
> Let's fix this before the first freeze hits.
Do you know what version of Rhino does dojo
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:29:24 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of rhino the autopkgtest of dojo fails in testing
> when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of rhino from
> unstable.
Unfortunately, there hasn't been any activity on
18 matches
Mail list logo