Source: racket-mode
Version: 20200115git0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> Targets: show-versions, clean, compile, deps, test, test-elisp, test-racket
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> dh_elpa_test
> emacs -batch -Q -l package --eval "(add-to-list 'package-directory-list
> \"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa\")" --eval "(add-to-list
> 'package-directory-list \"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src\")" -f
> package-initialize -L . -l racket-tests.el --eval
> \(ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit\)
> Running 4 tests (2020-12-26 18:42:00+0000, selector âtâ)
> passed 1/4 racket-tests/font-lock (0.085551 sec)
> Indenting region...
> Indenting region...done
> Indenting region...
> Indenting region...done
> passed 2/4 racket-tests/indent-rkt (0.096700 sec)
> Checking Racket version ...
>
> Starting racket to run /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/racket/run.rkt ...
> Connected to racket-command process on port 55557 after 1 attempt
> Test racket-tests/repl backtrace:
> signal(ert-test-failed (((should (racket-tests/see-rx "Welcome to Ra
> ert-fail(((should (racket-tests/see-rx "Welcome to Racket v?[0-9.]+\
> (if (unwind-protect (setq value-131 (apply fn-129 args-130)) (setq f
> (let (form-description-133) (if (unwind-protect (setq value-131 (app
> (let ((value-131 'ert-form-evaluation-aborted-132)) (let (form-descr
> (let* ((fn-129 #'racket-tests/see-rx) (args-130 (condition-case err
> (save-current-buffer (set-buffer repl-buffer) (let* ((fn-129 #'racke
> (progn (save-current-buffer (set-buffer repl-buffer) (let* ((fn-129
> (if repl-buffer (progn (save-current-buffer (set-buffer repl-buffer)
> (let ((repl-buffer (get-buffer racket--repl-buffer-name))) (if repl-
> (let ((tab-always-indent 'complete) (racket--cmd-connect-attempts ra
> (lambda nil (let ((tab-always-indent 'complete) (racket--cmd-connect
> ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
> ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name racket-tests/repl :documentation "Sta
> ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector t :tests [... ... ...
> ert-run-tests(t #f(compiled-function (event-type &rest event-args) #
> ert-run-tests-batch(nil)
> ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit()
> eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit) t)
> command-line-1(("-l" "package" "--eval" "(add-to-list 'package-direc
> command-line()
> normal-top-level()
> Test racket-tests/repl condition:
> (ert-test-failed
> ((should
> (racket-tests/see-rx "Welcome to Racket v?[0-9.]+\\(?: \\[cs\\].\\)?[
> ]\\(?:;.*[
> ]\\)*> "))
> :form
> (racket-tests/see-rx "Welcome to Racket v?[0-9.]+\\(?: \\[cs\\].\\)?[
> ]\\(?:;.*[
> ]\\)*> ")
> :value nil :explanation
> (actual . "Welcome to Racket v7.9 [bc].
> ; You started Racket Mode's REPL for no specific file. The namespace
> ; is just #lang racket/base. If you were expecting more things to be
> ; defined, try entering (require racket).
> ;
> ; Instead of using the racket-repl command, consider using
> ; Racket Mode's REPL as intended:
> ; 1. Visit a .rkt file.
> ; 2. Use the racket-run command.
> > ")))
> FAILED 3/4 racket-tests/repl (30.045897 sec)
> Checking Racket version ...
>
> Running check-syntax analysis...
> Marking up buffer...
>
> passed 4/4 racket-tests/run (2.048068 sec)
>
> Ran 4 tests, 3 results as expected, 1 unexpected (2020-12-26 18:42:33+0000,
> 32.447931 sec)
>
> 1 unexpected results:
> FAILED racket-tests/repl
>
> dh_elpa_test: error: emacs -batch -Q -l package --eval "(add-to-list
> 'package-directory-list \"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa\")" --eval
> "(add-to-list 'package-directory-list
> \"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src\")" -f package-initialize -L . -l
> racket-tests.el --eval \(ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit\) returned exit code 1
> make: *** [debian/rules:6: build] Error 25
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/26/racket-mode_20200115git0-1_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with me
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
