On 12/31/20 4:31 PM, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> Nowadays for
> urllib3 upstream uses a range of versions, and I take care of both urllib3 and
> requests, so we should not have problems.
Oh, it's very nice that upstream changed their mind, after all of this
time. Thanks for sharing this info. I can
On 2020-12-31 16:03:48 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/31/20 1:25 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Hi Thomas
> >
> > On 2020-12-31 13:06:37 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> Hi Sebastian,
> >>
> >> I'm challenging the fact that a circular dependency is a problem for
> >> arch:all packages.
Hello Thomas, hello Sebastian!
Thomas, thanks for always caring about requests!
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 04:03:48PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the issue was that requests had:
>
> python3-chardet (>= 3.0.2), python3-chardet (<< 3.1.0)
>
> as (build-)depends,
On 12/31/20 1:25 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> On 2020-12-31 13:06:37 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> I'm challenging the fact that a circular dependency is a problem for
>> arch:all packages. At least, it shouldn't be an RC bug, IMO.
>
> If packages cannot be
Hi Thomas
On 2020-12-31 13:06:37 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> I'm challenging the fact that a circular dependency is a problem for
> arch:all packages. At least, it shouldn't be an RC bug, IMO.
If packages cannot be built on the buildds, they are RC-buggy.
>
> If the
Hi Sebastian,
I'm challenging the fact that a circular dependency is a problem for
arch:all packages. At least, it shouldn't be an RC bug, IMO.
If the problem is bootstraping (which isn't a problem, since that's
arch:all), then a wishlist bug against requests so that it implements
the "nodoc"
6 matches
Mail list logo
