On 28/11/2023 18:56, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> [...]
> I had managed to successfully build a bootable image doing it "the old
> way" that worked on both pinebook (allwinner A64) and pinebook pro
> (rockchip rk3399) at "alternate offsets" that required no changes to the
> u-boot binaries... but tha
On 2023-11-28, harr...@gmx.ph wrote:
> On 27/11/2023 20:12, Vagrant Cascadian (@vagrant) wrote on salsa:
>>Thanks! Looks good to me, could you add (Closes: #XXX) on the first line of
>>the commit?
...
> Thanks for agreeing to the merge request. I've added the Closes: note.
Thanks!
> I just want
On 27/11/2023 20:12, Vagrant Cascadian (@vagrant) wrote on salsa:
>Thanks! Looks good to me, could you add (Closes: #XXX) on the first line of
>the commit?
Hi Vagrant,
Thanks for agreeing to the merge request. I've added the Closes: note.
I just wanted to note while the bug is still open, that
On 2023-07-25, Dave Jones wrote:
> Heinrich Schuchardt and I were just having a look at this area for the
> ubuntu packaging, specifically whether to include
> u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin in the u-boot-sunxi build (and whether to poke
> upstream to update the README that gets included by u-boot-su
Hi Vagrant,
Heinrich Schuchardt and I were just having a look at this area for the
ubuntu packaging, specifically whether to include
u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin in the u-boot-sunxi build (and whether to poke
upstream to update the README that gets included by u-boot-sunxi.docs),
and ran across
On 2021-01-31, harr...@gmx.ph wrote:
> I thought I might as well add the remaining 24 armhf boards to it while
> I was at it, so it now has 26 armhf and 11 arm64 boards, matching what's
> in debian/targets, sorted by U-Boot board name.
Hrm. This turns out to make it hard to consider merging the pa
Hi Vagrant,
Thanks very much for finding the time to look at this.
>Mixed feelings. It is getting pretty late in the release cycle, and the
>current code basically works and diverges less from code that has been
>there for a long time...
It does work, but in eleven cases (i.e. on the arm64 boar
On 2021-01-31, harr...@gmx.ph wrote:
> I thought I might as well add the remaining 24 armhf boards to it while
> I was at it, so it now has 26 armhf and 11 arm64 boards, matching what's
> in debian/targets, sorted by U-Boot board name.
Great!
> I think it would be nice if this simplification cou
Hi Vagrant,
I noticed that with commit 92f637eda9 we're starting to use the
u-boot-install-sunxi script for armhf boards as well as arm64, so I've
refreshed my patch to it, below.
I thought I might as well add the remaining 24 armhf boards to it while
I was at it, so it now has 26 armhf and 11 ar
Tags: patch
Hi Vagrant, thanks for looking at this.
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> This is fairly new in u-boot, but yes, it's probably possible in most
> cases with recent u-boot versions.
Great. I've tried making that change to debian/targets in version
2021.01+dfsg-1 (pat
On 2021-01-10, harr...@gmx.ph wrote:
> For 32-bit Allwinner boards, the u-boot-sunxi package provides the image
> u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin (as well as the standard uboot.elf), but for
> 64-bit boards it provides instead several components such as sunxi-spl.bin,
> u-boot.bin and u-boot-nodtb.bin.
Package: u-boot-sunxi
Version: 2021.01~rc4+dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi Vagrant,
For 32-bit Allwinner boards, the u-boot-sunxi package provides the image
u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin (as well as the standard uboot.elf), but for
64-bit boards it provides instead several components such as sunxi-spl.b
12 matches
Mail list logo
