Bug#979749: buster-pu: package emacs/1:26.1+1-3.2+deb10u1

2021-01-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 19:59 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > > > The metadata for that bug implies that it still affects the package > > in > > unstable (hence the lack of any green on the version graph). I > > suspect > > this is simply

Bug#979749: buster-pu: package emacs/1:26.1+1-3.2+deb10u1

2021-01-19 Thread Rob Browning
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > The metadata for that bug implies that it still affects the package in > unstable (hence the lack of any green on the version graph). I suspect > this is simply because the "fixed" version doesn't correspond to an > actual Debian package version. Please could you add

Bug#979749: buster-pu: package emacs/1:26.1+1-3.2+deb10u1

2021-01-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 20:08 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > dkg has requested that we consider fixing this bug in buster: > > Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/919642 > Upstream: https://debbugs.gnu.org/34121 > > which is fairly straightforward (just the new patch at the end, > cherry-picked

Bug#979749: buster-pu: package emacs/1:26.1+1-3.2+deb10u1

2021-01-10 Thread Rob Browning
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu dkg has requested that we consider fixing this bug in buster: Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/919642 Upstream: https://debbugs.gnu.org/34121 which is fairly straightforward