Hi again, Sam!
> I suggest you do more testing whenever you can reach the equipment doing a
> tcpdump of the traffic so that we know where the problem is, also, take a
> look to the firewalling you have just in case igmp or other traffic is being
> cut somewhere.
I have recently uploaded bridge-u
> To clarify one thing about my setup before someone points out it could
> cause problems.
> I talk about a wifi router. Note that I'm using an ethernet port on the
> wifi router, so I have no wifi bridging involved.
Well, exept for the part on my setup being free soft that I can play with...
you
> "Santiago" == Santiago Garcia Mantinan writes:
>> 1) eno1 is connected directly to a wifi router. I get an IPv6
>> address using router advertizements.
>>
>> But if I insteade slave that interface to a bridge say iface
>> brint inet dhcp bridge-ports eno1 auto brint
> 1) eno1 is connected directly to a wifi router.
> I get an IPv6 address using router advertizements.
>
> But if I insteade slave that interface to a bridge say
> iface brint inet dhcp
> bridge-ports eno1
> auto brint
>
> then I don't get a global v6 address on the bridge.
Well, this is kind
The setup that does not work for me (and that I don't currently have
access to is)
Works:
1) eno1 is connected directly to a wifi router.
I get an IPv6 address using router advertizements.
But if I insteade slave that interface to a bridge say
iface brint inet dhcp
bridge-ports eno1
auto brin
Hi!
> Here's what I've found so far.
> https://askubuntu.com/questions/460405/ipv6-does-not-work-over-bridge
Ok, I see the problem the guy has but I don't get a clear setup definition,
also that was a long long time ago.
> This answer suggests that it's IGMP snooping *not* STP that is the
> pr
Hi.
Here's what I've found so far.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/460405/ipv6-does-not-work-over-bridge
This answer suggests that it's IGMP snooping *not* STP that is the
problem.
That makes a lot more sense to me, and has an obvious fix:
* Either disable IGMP snooping
or
* Enable an IGMP qu
Looking into it.
--Sam
Hi!
It was Stephen who put some light on the original bug, as this is quite a
kernel thing...
> need both. The correct solution is to run DAD after the port has gone
> to forwarding.
I agree.
> Please document how to accomplish this on Linux where you document that
> it doesn't work with bridg
package: bridge-utils
severity: important
version: 1.6-3
justification: breaks actual switches that need v6
In 736336 , you documented that stp breaks ipv6. As was pointed out in
the bug report that's kind of bogus. You clearly need both in some
situations. As an example, if you are actually ru
10 matches
Mail list logo
