control: tag -1 + pending
Hello,
On Mon 25 Jan 2021 at 06:13PM +01, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: dh-elpa
> Version: 2.0.6
> Tags: patch
>
> Please provide dh-sequence-elpa. Doing so allows using it declaratively.
> Instead of adding "--with elpa" to the dh invocation, one can then add
> dh-se
Starting with David's question (paraphrased beyond recognition): "Will
it break stuff if I add this Provides?"
Nothing will break. As long as /exactly one/ binary package has that
"Provides" and installing the package will in fact ensure that the
add-on is functional, then everything will be fine
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 02:42:14PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> debhelper knows about addons. Traditionally, you could enable them via
> "--with foo". That turned out to be difficult when you want an addon for
> for an architecture-independent package (e.g. sphinx) and can skip it
> for arch-only
Hi David,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:06:59AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I haven't really undestood the implications of this yet. Are you
> proposing this change for bullseye, or can it wait until after the
> freeze?
This is not obvious. Let me give more details, so you can get a better
picture
Helmut Grohne writes:
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> libtext-glob-perl,
> ${misc:Depends},
> ${perl:Depends},
> +Provides: dh-sequence-elpa
> Description: Debian helper tools for packaging emacs lisp extensions
> This package provides a helper for pac
Package: dh-elpa
Version: 2.0.6
Tags: patch
Please provide dh-sequence-elpa. Doing so allows using it declaratively.
Instead of adding "--with elpa" to the dh invocation, one can then add
dh-sequence-elpa to Build-Depends. Using the dependency technique, use
of the addon can be restricted to indep
6 matches
Mail list logo
