Bug#983379: [PATCH] um: mark all kernel symbols as local

2021-03-08 Thread Johannes Berg
On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 15:59 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi, > > Just a follow-up question on this fix. > > Is it something that is a candidate for linux-stable ? I guess that makes sense. Once it's in mainline you can also request that yourself :) johannes

Bug#983379: [PATCH] um: mark all kernel symbols as local

2021-03-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi, Just a follow-up question on this fix. Is it something that is a candidate for linux-stable ? Thanks, Ritesh On Sat, 2021-03-06 at 16:21 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > Marking all the symbols as local seems correct, and does seem > > > to address the issue, so do that. Also do it

Bug#983379: [PATCH] um: mark all kernel symbols as local

2021-03-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 20:54 +, Anton Ivanov wrote: > On 05/03/2021 20:43, Johannes Berg wrote: > > From: Johannes Berg > > > > Ritesh reported a bug [1] against UML, noting that it crashed on > > startup. The backtrace shows the following (heavily redacted): > > > > (gdb) bt > > ... > >  

Bug#983379: [PATCH] um: mark all kernel symbols as local

2021-03-05 Thread Anton Ivanov
On 05/03/2021 20:43, Johannes Berg wrote: From: Johannes Berg Ritesh reported a bug [1] against UML, noting that it crashed on startup. The backtrace shows the following (heavily redacted): (gdb) bt ... #26 0x60015b5d in sem_init () at ipc/sem.c:268 #27 0x7f89906d92f7 in ?? ()

Bug#983379: [PATCH] um: mark all kernel symbols as local

2021-03-05 Thread Johannes Berg
From: Johannes Berg Ritesh reported a bug [1] against UML, noting that it crashed on startup. The backtrace shows the following (heavily redacted): (gdb) bt ... #26 0x60015b5d in sem_init () at ipc/sem.c:268 #27 0x7f89906d92f7 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcom_err.so.2