Hello Paul,
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 07:10:47PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 26-06-2021 18:03, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > I fixed it in 4.9.3-4~bpo10.
> >
> > However, I think the BTS does not pick up Closes lines from backports?
>
> I think it does, but the changelog doesn't have an appropriat
Hello Craig,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:42:53AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> I'm still not sure if procps and psmisc need to be updated to cater for the
> later version of manpages-de.
I don't belive so.
> I think the issue is that some of the conflicting manpages made it back
> into that package,
Hi All,
I'm still not sure if procps and psmisc need to be updated to cater for the
later version of manpages-de.
I think the issue is that some of the conflicting manpages made it back
into that package, so I need to update psmisc/procps?
- Craig
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 05:39, Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Paul,
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 07:10:47PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 26-06-2021 18:03, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > I fixed it in 4.9.3-4~bpo10.
> >
> > However, I think the BTS does not pick up Closes lines from backports?
>
> I think it does, but the changelog doesn't have an appropriat
Hi,
On 26-06-2021 18:03, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> I fixed it in 4.9.3-4~bpo10.
>
> However, I think the BTS does not pick up Closes lines from backports?
I think it does, but the changelog doesn't have an appropriate "Closes"
stanza, so the BTS has no way to know:
https://tracker.debian.org/new
Hello Paul,
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 03:08:34PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:19:17 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Hi Craig and Helge,
> >
> > Craig Small wrote:
> > > reassign -1 manpages-de
> >
> > Might be the right place indeed, but maybe not in the way you'd
> > expect. S
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:19:17 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Craig and Helge,
>
> Craig Small wrote:
> > reassign -1 manpages-de
>
> Might be the right place indeed, but maybe not in the way you'd
> expect. See below.
Reading this bug report, it seems that the consensus was that
manpages-de
Hello all,
I locally build the backport for 4.10.0. I created a buster chroot,
installed manpages-de, manpages-fr and manpages-pl from backports and
did a dist-ugprade to current testing.
If I do this without the fix, the upgrade fails (as now expected),
however, a "apt-get -f install" seems to fi
Hello Axel,
hello Craig,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:19:17PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Craig Small wrote:
> > reassign -1 manpages-de
>
> Might be the right place indeed, but maybe not in the way you'd
> expect. See below.
Ack. And thank you very much for your analysis and suggestions.
> > > J
Hello Craig,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 06:35:19PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 18:04, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> > JFTR: What came to me after sending that mail and what I didn't check
> > so far, is if 4.9.3-4 is fine, but 4.9.3-4~bpo10+1 has those files.
> >
> > Actually in tha
Hello Craig,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:41:56AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 00:03, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> > So the Breaks and Replaces headers (c.f. #982059) should likely be
> > against "<< 4.9.3-4", not just against "<< 4.9.1-1".
> >
>
> It looks like both the psmisc an
Hi Craig and Helge,
Craig Small wrote:
> reassign -1 manpages-de
Might be the right place indeed, but maybe not in the way you'd
expect. See below.
> > JFTR: What came to me after sending that mail and what I didn't check
> > so far, is if 4.9.3-4 is fine, but 4.9.3-4~bpo10+1 has those files.
>
reassign -1 manpages-de
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 18:04, Axel Beckert wrote:
> JFTR: What came to me after sending that mail and what I didn't check
> so far, is if 4.9.3-4 is fine, but 4.9.3-4~bpo10+1 has those files.
>
> Actually in that case, I have no idea how the Breaks/Replaces headers
> and
Hi,
Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 00:03, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > So the Breaks and Replaces headers (c.f. #982059) should likely be
> > against "<< 4.9.3-4", not just against "<< 4.9.1-1".
>
> It looks like both the psmisc and procps manpages came back from the dead.
> They were re
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 00:03, Axel Beckert wrote:
> So the Breaks and Replaces headers (c.f. #982059) should likely be
> against "<< 4.9.3-4", not just against "<< 4.9.1-1".
>
It looks like both the psmisc and procps manpages came back from the dead.
They were removed in manpages-de 4.9.1-1 and
Package: psmisc
Version: 23.4-2
Severity: serious
A non-english speaking friend did a dist-upgrade of a laptop from buster
+ buster-backports to bullseye and it failed at psmisc as follows
(German locale):
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-AvDBUc/0-psmisc_23.4-2_amd6
16 matches
Mail list logo
