Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

2022-01-28 Thread Andrew
As of kernel 5.15.5 (bpo) I see that max_t() is still used. If this is blocking any merge into the stable kernel patch, I can test it with just PAGE_SIZE to confirm whether it is okay. As it stands, I currently need to manually build the stable kernel in order to have a functioning Blackbird

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

2022-01-27 Thread Nathaniel Filardo
It looks like the missing patch made its way into 5.15.0-0.bpo.2-powerpc64le, as f4d3da72a76a9ce... I think. As a result, I think this bug is overcome by events and can be closed. On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 12:37 PM Christian König wrote: > > > > Am 30.10.21 um 16:32 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: >

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

2021-10-30 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:08:21PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:30:21AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Am 10.10.21 um 16:14 schrieb Xi Ruoyao: > > > On Sun, 2021-10-10 at 14:46 +0100, Nathaniel Filardo wrote: > > > > It occurs to me, quite belatedly,

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

2021-10-13 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:30:21AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 10.10.21 um 16:14 schrieb Xi Ruoyao: > > On Sun, 2021-10-10 at 14:46 +0100, Nathaniel Filardo wrote: > > > It occurs to me, quite belatedly, that it may be worth asking the > > > author, reviewers, and signers of the change

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

2021-10-11 Thread Christian König
Am 10.10.21 um 16:14 schrieb Xi Ruoyao: On Sun, 2021-10-10 at 14:46 +0100, Nathaniel Filardo wrote: It occurs to me, quite belatedly, that it may be worth asking the author, reviewers, and signers of the change in question their thoughts on this bug report:

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

2021-10-10 Thread Xi Ruoyao
On Sun, 2021-10-10 at 14:46 +0100, Nathaniel Filardo wrote: > It occurs to me, quite belatedly, that it may be worth asking the > author, reviewers, and signers of the change in question their > thoughts on this bug report: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990279 > > In

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

2021-10-10 Thread Nathaniel Filardo
It occurs to me, quite belatedly, that it may be worth asking the author, reviewers, and signers of the change in question their thoughts on this bug report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990279 In particular, on ppc64 systems, Linux typically is configured to use a 64KiB page