Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.16.15-1
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
in bullseye /etc/default/bind9 is not considered anymore (like in
previous versions). Now it have to be /etc/default/named
This should be mentioned in the upgrade process
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers oldstable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU thread)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages bind9 depends on:
ii adduser 3.118
ii bind9-libs 1:9.16.15-1
ii bind9-utils 1:9.16.15-1
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.77
ii dns-root-data 2021011101
ii init-system-helpers 1.60
ii iproute2 5.10.0-4
ii libc6 2.31-13
ii libcap2 1:2.44-1
ii libfstrm0 0.6.0-1+b1
ii libjson-c5 0.15-2
ii liblmdb0 0.9.24-1
ii libmaxminddb0 1.5.2-1
ii libprotobuf-c1 1.3.3-1+b2
ii libssl1.1 1.1.1k-1
ii libuv1 1.40.0-2
ii libxml2 2.9.10+dfsg-6.7
ii lsb-base 11.1.0
ii netbase 6.3
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2
bind9 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages bind9 suggests:
pn bind-doc <none>
ii bind9-dnsutils [dnsutils] 1:9.16.15-1
ii dnsutils 1:9.16.15-1
pn resolvconf <none>
pn ufw <none>
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/bind/db.root [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/bind/db.root'
/etc/bind/named.conf.local changed [not included]
/etc/bind/named.conf.options changed [not included]
/etc/default/named changed [not included]
-- debconf information:
bind9/start-as-user: bind
bind9/different-configuration-file:
bind9/run-resolvconf: false
