Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas

2023-09-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Simon McVittie writes: > Here are some updated patches for Policy, incorporating this requirement. > I have not attempted to incorporate the corner case involving > build-profiles. I think if we were going to do that, it would require > documenting build-profiles first (#757760), and maybe even

Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas

2021-12-23 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Simon, On Fri 29 Oct 2021 at 10:51AM +01, Simon McVittie wrote: > From a332e4e787837cac0856c9c36d6e87e9f19197e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Simon McVittie > Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:43:20 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] archive: Point out that mixed main/contrib source > packages can

Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas

2021-11-01 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:51:44AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Here are some updated patches for Policy, incorporating this requirement. thanks for your work on this, Simon. > I have not attempted to incorporate the corner case involving > build-profiles. I think if we were going to do that,

Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas

2021-10-29 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 at 21:15:06 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 17:39 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > In the form of a table, the allowed source/binary combinations are: > > > >   |    binary   | > >   | main  contrib  non-free | >

Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas

2021-09-09 Thread Ansgar
On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 12:48 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > But source packages in main must also produce at least one binary > > package in main[1]. > > Let's include that point in Policy. > > > [1]: Probably with the default build profile if we care about corner > >    cases. > > Are we

Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas

2021-09-09 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 09 Sep 2021 at 09:15PM +02, Ansgar wrote: > On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 17:39 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> >> ftp team: is this correct? > > Yes. Indeed. > But source packages in main must also produce at least one binary > package in main[1]. Let's include that point in Policy. >

Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas

2021-09-09 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 17:39 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > In the form of a table, the allowed source/binary combinations are: > >   |    binary   | >   | main  contrib  non-free | > -|-| >   

Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas

2021-09-09 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: debian-policy Version: 4.6.0.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: ftpmas...@debian.org If you have an upstream project consisting of Free source code with a mixture of Free and non-Free dependencies, it isn't currently clear how that should be packaged. For example, if