On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 00:29 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Yeah, I was just noticing that. I'll wait a few more months to see if
> youtube-dl does an actual release, but long-term it might make sense
> to
> turn youtube-dl into an empty package that depends on yt-dlp.
This could make sense even
Am Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 12:29:50AM -0400 schrieb Andres Salomon:
> Yeah, I was just noticing that. I'll wait a few more months to see if
> youtube-dl does an actual release, but long-term it might make sense to turn
> youtube-dl into an empty package that depends on yt-dlp.
>
> Since they have
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 02:44:37 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 02:36 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > It looks like things have changed and 'dirkf' has become the new
> > maintainer:
>
> My understanding was the was mostly "maintaining" it for stuff that
> doesn't
On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 02:36 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> It looks like things have changed and 'dirkf' has become the new
> maintainer:
My understanding was the was mostly "maintaining" it for stuff that
doesn't support new python versions.
Commit-wise it doesn't seem near as active as
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:45:46 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
> I don't know what the current status of upstream is, but if youtube-dl
> upstream continues - I would be happy to help co-maintain the package.
It looks like things have changed and 'dirkf' has become the new maintainer:
5 matches
Mail list logo
