Bug#994551: libcifpp1: please split off static files to separate package

2021-09-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andrius, On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:20:51AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > Normally I would concur here, as I do not read [1] as allowing anyone to > override severe violations of the Debian policy. Moreover, autorm > deadline is reset each time a message arrives on this bug thread. You

Bug#994551: libcifpp1: please split off static files to separate package

2021-09-27 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Nilesh, On 2021-09-25 17:55, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Actually, this bug is now triggering an ugly autorm on several packages. > And since it needs to travel via NEW, they might end up getting removed > from testing. > > @Andrius, since you wrote: > >> So far, there has not been other libcifppX

Bug#994551: libcifpp1: please split off static files to separate package

2021-09-27 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Étienne, On 2021-09-24 23:51, Étienne Mollier wrote: > I took the liberty to implement the change you suggest, and push > to Salsa [1]. Since this is an RC bug which propagates on > several packages, and since it would have to go through NEW, for > manual review; I thought that time would be

Bug#994551: libcifpp1: please split off static files to separate package

2021-09-25 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Nilesh, Nilesh Patra, on 2021-09-25: > > Hi Étienne, all, > > > I took the liberty to implement the change you suggest, and push > > to Salsa [1]. > > I do not see your changes on salsa, the last commit is 3 months old > there. > Did you forget to push? Yes, I forgot, sorry about that; I

Bug#994551: libcifpp1: please split off static files to separate package

2021-09-25 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Étienne, all, > I took the liberty to implement the change you suggest, and push > to Salsa [1]. I do not see your changes on salsa, the last commit is 3 months old there. Did you forget to push? > Since this is an RC bug which propagates on > several packages, and since it would have to go

Bug#994551: libcifpp1: please split off static files to separate package

2021-09-24 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 patch Hi Maarten, Hi Andrius, On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:43:28 +0300 Andrius Merkys wrote: > I have just noticed that libcifpp1 violates section 8.2 of Debian policy: Thanks Andrius for catching this! > I suggest splitting them off to a separate Architecture: all package, > for

Bug#994551: libcifpp1: please split off static files to separate package

2021-09-17 Thread Andrius Merkys
Package: libcifpp1 Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: serious Hello, I have just noticed that libcifpp1 violates section 8.2 of Debian policy: > If your package contains files whose names do not change with each > change in the library shared object version, you must not put them in > the shared