On 2021-11-04 23:29:06 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> I have fixed gmsh. It will appear in NEW soon.
Thanks, but unfortunately it was rejected.
Cheers
>
> Regards
>
> Anton
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2021-11-04 22:35, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2021-11-04 21:41, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2021-11-03 22:33:01 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
...
Is it best to revert back to strict Policy 8.1 compliance, which will
slow
down hypre patch release updates?
Yes. Having to wait for binNEW to being
I have fixed gmsh. It will appear in NEW soon.
Regards
Anton
On 2021-11-04 21:41, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2021-11-03 22:33:01 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
...
The problem that hypre 2.18.1-1 (un-versioned libhypre) intended to
solve is
that hypre is ABI-ignorant
(https://github.com/hypre-space/hypre/issues/56),
so each point patch release would have
On 2021-11-03 22:33:01 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2021-11-03 20:57, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Source: hypre
> > Severity: serious
> ...
> > The real blocker is hypre, specifically:
> >
> > hypre (2.18.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Team upload.
> >* New upstream
On 2021-11-03 20:57, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Source: hypre
Severity: serious
...
The real blocker is hypre, specifically:
hypre (2.18.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
* New upstream release.
* Standards-Version: 4.4.1
* Provide library binary package as
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:hypre 2.18.1-1
Control: tags -2 =
Control: severity -2 serious
Let's try that again …
On 2021-11-03 20:57:27 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Source: hypre
> Version: 2.18.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 8.1
> Control: retitle -1
Source: hypre
Version: 2.18.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.1
Control: retitle -1 hypre: shared libraries package must be renamed on SONAME
change (Policy 8.1)
On 2021-11-03 09:49:13 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2021-10-31 20:57, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > sundials_5.8.0 is in
On 2021-10-31 20:57, Anton Gladky wrote:
sundials_5.8.0 is in unstable already.
Thanks Anton.
Is deal.ii the core blocker at this point? Looks like it has other
issues, Bug#996277, not related to the numerical library transition.
It's scheduled for removal next week.
Drew
sundials_5.8.0 is in unstable already.
Cheers
Anton
On 2021-10-30 11:04, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2021-10-30 00:50:49 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
I've got dolfinx passing (or skipping) its own tests on 32-bit.
There's a problem with 32-bit MPI though. i386 and armhf are failing
to run
pytest over python unit tests in MPI
...
Might be
On 2021-10-30 00:50:49 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2021-10-22 14:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2021-10-12 13:09:02, Drew Parsons wrote:
> ...
> > > I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical library stack.
> ...
> > > (along with other fenics components). There is currently
On 2021-10-22 14:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2021-10-12 13:09:02, Drew Parsons wrote:
...
I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical library stack.
...
(along with other fenics components). There is currently some problem
with fenics-dolfinx 1:0.3.0-4 on 32-bit arches i386,
I think since #997664 was a preexisting problem (it's already in
testing), leave it for now so as not to delay the transition of the
other packages. Can clear up the sundials ABI afterwards in a separate
transition.
(separately, xsimd also needs to pass for this transition, unless we
decide
Hi Anton,
On 10/26/21 08:56, Anton Gladky wrote:
OK, I will upload it into unstable very soon. What abou #997664?
The package should go to NEW actually. Or leave it as it is for the moment?
The upload to experimental is built on all release architectures.
Is there anything preventing the
OK, I will upload it into unstable very soon. What abou #997664?
The package should go to NEW actually. Or leave it as it is for the moment?
Anton
Am Mo., 25. Okt. 2021 um 21:15 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons :
>
> The sundials 5.8.0 test build in experimental looks successful.
> Probably not worth
The sundials 5.8.0 test build in experimental looks successful.
Probably not worth waiting for the mipsel build, it's been slow to
build, especially for experimental.
Drew
On 2021-10-22 17:40, Anton Gladky wrote:
Great, thanks! Will do it very shortly.
Anton
Sebastian Ramacher schrieb
Great, thanks! Will do it very shortly.
Anton
Sebastian Ramacher schrieb am Fr., 22. Okt. 2021,
14:35:
> Hi Anton
>
> On 2021-10-12 13:09:02, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
Hi Anton
On 2021-10-12 13:09:02, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, Anton Gladky
>
> I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical
On 2021-10-18 21:37:35 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-10-18 13:24:20, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > On 2021-10-16 00:01, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > On 2021-10-15 21:02, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical library stack.
> > > >
On 2021-10-18 13:24:20, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2021-10-16 00:01, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > On 2021-10-15 21:02, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical library stack.
> > > > This involves
> ...
> > Thanks Sebastian. I'll start from
On 2021-10-16 00:01, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2021-10-15 21:02, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical library stack.
This involves
...
Thanks Sebastian. I'll start from superlu (and xtensor already
underway).
Waiting for the trilinos rebuild
On 2021-10-15 21:02, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2021-10-12 13:09:02 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical library stack.
This involves
...
Please go ahead
Cheers
Ben file:
title = "numerical library stack";
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2021-10-12 13:09:02 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, Anton Gladky
>
> I'd like to proceed with a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, Anton Gladky
I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical library stack.
This involves
superlu 5.2.2+dfsg1 -> 5.3.0+dfsg1
25 matches
Mail list logo
