Hi Ludovic,
are you still maintaining this package, or should it be moved to QA
maintainance?
The FTBFS is trivial to fix, but there is a point that someone should
also upgrade to new upstream code (assuming the new upstream is usable).
Thanks
Adrian
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 11:59:03AM +0900,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 12:50:58AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> are you still maintaining this package, or should it be moved to QA
> maintainance?
>
Hi Adrian,
Yes, an update is on the way!
Thanks,
--
Ludovic Drolez.
https://isabelleantoine.be - Coaching and NLP
Source: gjiten
Version: 2.6-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> d
Hi,
maybe it's a good chance to change to the new updated version of gjiten at
https://github.com/DarkTrick/gjiten
The new version might also encounter packaging problems, but it uses more
recent technology and updates; It's probably more worthful to spend time there
than in the 10 year old pa
4 matches
Mail list logo