Sorry, debian-rele...@bugs.d.o really doesn't exist...
> Hi all,
>
> (Dared to fix CC/Subject which seemed to be somewhat broken in initial email.)
>
> > The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
> > hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
> >
> > The issue see
Hi all,
(Dared to fix CC/Subject which seemed to be somewhat broken in initial email.)
> The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
> hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
>
> The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to the
> upstream maint
(keeping everything CC'ed...dunno if that's what's expected)
Quoting Neil McGovern (ne...@debian.org):
> pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Bcc:
> Subject: ClamAV supportability in stable releases
> Reply-To:
>
> Hi,
>
> The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (a
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > >
> > > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in the matter , then I
> > > would like
> > > | > to request the same for the following packages:
> > > | >
> > > | >octave2.1, quantlib, r-base
> > > | >
> > > | > for the
> > > | >
> > > | >arm, m68k
Guys:
| >
| > architectures. I have spent *way* too much fscking special requests for
| > these smaller + older architecture which are, quite simply, mismatched for
| > these numerically-focussed applications and environments.
|
| Please convince a porter for those architectures to add the r
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:39:15AM -0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#167780: 0.3.4 is in testing]
> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux site
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Newsgroups: local.debian-68k
>
> >
> > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in
7 matches
Mail list logo
