I have pushed code to
https://salsa.debian.org/amazingfate/golang-github-cloudflare-apt-transport-cloudflared.
And I also send access request to repo
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-akihirosuda-apt-transport-oci.
Looking forward to see oci support added to debian.
Best
Package: ippsample
Version: 0.0~git20220607.72f89b3-1+b4
Severity: grave
ippsample explicitly Depends: libcups2. It should be changed to the t64 name if
it's really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'),
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2024-04-19 17:11:44 +0100, Chris Boot wrote:
> On 26/11/2023 11:36, Chris Boot wrote:
> > On 26/11/2023 10:56, Chris Boot wrote:
> > > > Any way to reduce possible breakage, or to detect and fix it
> > > > before the transition starts? Like rebuilding rdeps, or
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.
The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru pike8.0-8.0.1738/debian/README.Debian
pike8.0-8.0.1738/debian/README.Debian
--- pike8.0-8.0.1738/debian/README.Debian 2015-09-20 16:40:03.0
+
+++ pike8.0-8.0.1738/debian/README.Debian 2024-04-20
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: uart-devices
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : J. Nick Koston
* URL : https://github.com/bdraco/uart-devices
* License
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/zeromq/gsl/pull/52
I have created an upstream Pull Request for Yavor's work.
Please consider merging it.
Source: netgen
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 6.2.2401+dfsg1-1.1+b1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
netgen fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=netgen=armhf=6.2.2401%2Bdfsg1-1.1%2Bb1=1712667539=0
Regards,
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
This issue has been addressed by upstream in [1], and is included in
version 2.0.9.
It would be nice if that version could be packaged.
--
Håvard
[1] https://github.com/Xubuntu/lightdm-gtk-greeter/pull/80
OAuth 2.0 Scopes for Google APIs:
https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/scopes
Dear Sir,
Say hello to Airtel Xstream AirFiber Superfast home internet service .
Introducing Airtel Xstream AirFiber, India's first wireless home internet,
powered by 5G Plus.Discover the power of wireless connectivity and superfast
speeds with Airtel Xstream AirFiber. With built in Wi-Fi 6,
Package: libui-gxmlcpp5t64
Version: 1.4.6-1.1+b1
Severity: grave
Unsatisfied dependencies:
libui-gxmlcpp5t64 : Depends: libui-gxmlcpp5v5 (>= 1.4.3) but it is not
installable
This is because override_dh_makeshlibs generates a dep on the pre-t64 name.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Thursday, 18 April 2024 19:21:55 CEST you wrote:
> Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
> Version: 3.004
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source
This really looks like a bug with prove:
$ perl t/reorder.t
ok 1 - test re-ordered list
1..1
$ prove -l -v
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 12:00:00AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 25/3/24 a las 20:12, Chris Lamb escribió:
Alberto Bertogli wrote:
If you know of a functional official image that I can use to try to
reproduce the problem, or recently-tested steps I can follow to get
a working qemu install,
Hi,
I upgraded yesterday my machine from bookworm/stable to trixie/testing.
KMail was used to check if I can send emails - this seems no more to work.
Seeing the same issue like Ariel Garcia in #1033462 (sorry partly in German):
We have an error during reading password "Entry not found"
We
Package: libvdeplug-pcap
Version: 0.1.0-2+b3
Severity: grave
libvdeplug-pcap explicitly Depends: libvdeplug2, libpcap0.8. They should be
changed to the t64 names if they are really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:29:11PM +0300, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> +``Static-Built-Using``
> +~~
IMO this should not only state when it is to be used, but also what
it is used for and by whom. IOW who is the intended receiver. What
will they do with the info provided in this
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jianfeng Liu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org,
liujianfeng1...@gmail.com
* Package name: golang-github-akihirosuda-apt-transport-oci
Version : 0.0~git20240416.a7e2cf0-1
Upstream Contact: Akihiro Suda
Hi Thorsten,
Quoting mirabilos:
> (at least bookworm’s) lintian complains about…
> I: mksh source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream
> [debian/patches/typeset-p-fix.diff]
> … for patches whose DEP 3 metadata clearly state they are a
> cherry-pick or backport from upstream.
>
> Here (cherry-pick):
>
>
Package: libcegui-mk2-dev
Version: 0.8.7+git20220615-5.1+b5
Severity: grave
Unsatisfied dependencies:
libcegui-mk2-dev : Depends: libxerces-c3.2 but it is not installable
It should be changed to the t64 name if it's really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT
hi all
Leaving aside the questions of dependencies of other Debian packages,
I agree that 5.2.5 looks like the most recent version that is
definitely free of any directly or indirectly authored contributions
by Jia Tan.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xz-utils/-/tree/v5.2.5?ref_type=tags
In
Source: qwinff
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
qwinff fails to build on armhel,armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qwinff=armel=0.2.1%2Bgit20201215-2=1685891638=0
Package: gvmd
Version: 23.1.0-1+b4
Severity: grave
gvmd explicitly Depends: libgvm22. It should be changed to the t64 name if it's
really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
Package: thunderbird
Version: 1:115.9.0-1+b1
Severity: serious
thunderbird explicitly Depends: libotr5. It should be changed to the t64 name
if it's really needed.
Note that the package is still installable because it's not built on 32-bit
time64 arches, but it still needs to be fixed so that
Package: libxbase64-1t64
Version: 3.1.2-14.1+b2
Severity: grave
$ head -1 /var/lib/dpkg/info/libxbase64-1t64:armhf.symbols
libxbase64.so.1 libxbase64-1 #MINVER#
This makes libxbase64-bin uninstallable as it now Depends on libxbase64-1. It
would make other revdeps uninstallable too, but this
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum, on 2024-03-13:
> > build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-311/pyrex/obitools/word/_readindex.c:6320:3:
> > error: implicit declaration of function ‘heapsort’
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Interesting, if I trust the Debian online manual of heapsort[1],
this is a
Package: ksh93u+m
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: minor
The ksh93u+m package description contains
KornShell is an interactive UNIX command interpreter as well as a POSIX
^
compliant scripting language which is a superset of
Package: prometheus-node-exporter-collectors
Version: 0.0~git20230203.6f710f8-1
Ohai,
I know it's custom in Debian to auto-enable services when they are
installed, however I think that the broad variety of timers present in
the collectors package deserves a different treatment, as people usually
Source: rust-servo-freetype-sys
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 4.0.5-2
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
rust-servo-freetype-sys fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-servo-freetype-sys=armel=4.0.5-2=1688825741=0
My code has been pushed to
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-cloudflare-apt-transport-cloudflared/
with help from Maytham. And this package is the build dependency
of Bug#1069330: ITP: golang-github-akihirosuda-apt-transport-oci:
Package: nautilus-wipe
Version: 0.4.alpha2-0.1+b4
Severity: grave
nautilus-wipe explicitly Depends: libgtk-3-0. It should be changed to the t64
name if it's really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
Package: prads
Version: 0.3.3-7+b5
Severity: grave
prads explicitly Depends: libpcap0.8. It should be changed to the t64 name if
it's really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'),
Package: seafile-gui
Version: 9.0.4+ds1-1+b4
Severity: grave
seafile-gui explicitly Depends: libsearpc1, libseafile0. They should be changed
to the t64 names if they are really needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500,
Control: reopen -1
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 06:57:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> qt5-ukui-platformtheme (1.0.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>[Steve langasek]
>* Remove hard-coded dependencies on libqt5widgets5 and libgsettings-qt1.
> and don't hard-code
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bbcp
Version : 14.04.14.00.1 (from cpmpiled bbcp -h)
Upstream Author : Ertuğrul Emre Ertekin (Maintainer)
* URL : https://github.com/eeertekin/bbcp
* License : LGPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
Package: chromium
Version: 124.0.6367.60-1~deb12u1
Since the last update, Chromium does work with native Wayland. It is
starting up, but it is displaying an invisible window. It is listed in
the window switchers (Alt+Tab), Gnome Shell etc., but invisible.
Note: The default configuration uses X11
Sean Whitton writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed 27 Mar 2024 at 11:40pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
>> Sean Whitton writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Rob, can you review the implementation in d/rules for Xiyue's patch to
>>> this bug, please? I'm not sure it's the straightforward way to do it.
>>>
>>> Xiyue,
Workaround:
If you are stuck Chromium using native Wayland support, you can reset
it with the following steps:
1. Log out GNOME on Wayland session and log in with Gnome on Xorg
session.
2. Launch Chromium.
3. Enter chrome://flags into URL bar and reset the setting “Preferred
Ozone platform” to
Package: linux-cpupower
Version: 6.7.9-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: witold.bary...@gmail.com
turbostat 6.7.9-2 core dumps on my AMD Threadripper 2950X
linux-cpupower_6.6.15-2_amd64.deb works fine.
gdb session with 6.7.9-2
root@debian:~# gdb turbostat
GNU gdb (Debian 13.2-1) 13.2
Reading
Thank you Ervin,
I was wondering about the possibility of a trigger that would change the
IncludeOptional to Include if the debian machine is running nginx.
Best regards,
Salil
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 22:18, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> Hi Salil,
>
> Thanks for reporting.
>
> Unfortunately this is
El 15/4/24 a las 22:26, Bill Allombert escribió:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 09:52:39AM +, MOESSBAUER, Felix wrote:
On Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:44:38 + sohe4b+2fz7rb0ixc53g@cs.email wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 12.4+deb12u1
Followup-For: Bug #1039979
Control: tags -1 patch
I attach a
rixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
> > Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
>
>
> > > sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu but
> > > it is not installable
> > > E: Unable to correct problems, yo
Control: retitle -1 libgweather4: FTBFS on arm64: Location 'Greenland' has
invalid timezone 'America/Godthab'
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 14:06:28 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > # GLib-GIO-DEBUG: Failed to initialize portal (GNetworkMonitorPortal) for
> >
Source: cbmc
Version: 5.95.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: haskell-github
Version: 0.28.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: haskell-crypton-x509-validation
Version: 1.6.12-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: macaulay2
Version: 1.23+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: dbcsr
Version: 2.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: olpc-kbdshim
Version: 27-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc
Source: pi-tm1638
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
Source: osmo-iuh
Version: 1.3.0+dfsg1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: mpi4py
Version: 3.1.5-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: haskell-language-python
Version: 0.5.8-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: gtg-trace
Version: 0.2-3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: olpc-powerd
Version: 23-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -W
Source: jinput
Version: 20100502+dfsg-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: checkinstall
Version: 1.6.2+git20170426.d24a630-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: arpack
Version: 3.9.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: h5py
Version: 3.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libnginx-mod-http-set-misc
Version: 0.33-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Hi Edwards,
Quoting Edward Betts (2024-04-20 11:46:37)
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Edward Betts
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: uart-devices
> Version : 0.1.0
> Upstream Author : J. Nick Koston
Hi Anthony,
A few weeks ago you uploaded a new version of golang-google-protobuf
to unstable which caused a FTBFS in golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5
v1.5.3 [1,2,3]. This has been blocking the transition of various golang
packages from unstable to testing.
I've verified that v1.5.4 of
Source: gnome-pkg-tools
Version: 0.22.9
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint
Gunnar Hjalmarsson has retired [1][2].
Please remove them from the Uploaders list of the package.
Thank.
[1] https://nm.debian.org/person/gunnarhj/
[2]
Hi Nilesh,
>Right. AFAICS, lintian spews that warning because the header in that patch in
>incomplete. It also needs a "From" and "Subject" (which can be same as commit
this is not entirely correct.
The full patch header is:
Description: fix typeset -p confusion between empty and unset
Origin:
Source: gnome-settings-daemon
Version: 46.0-1
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint
Gunnar Hjalmarsson has retired [1][2].
Please remove them from the Uploaders list of the package.
Thank.
[1] https://nm.debian.org/person/gunnarhj/
[2]
Package: wnpp
Owner: Michael R. Crusoe
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : python-hatch-mypyc
Version : 0.16.0
Upstream Author : Ofek Lev
* URL : https://github.com/ofek/hatch-mypyc
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Hatch build hook plugin for Mypyc
Provides a build hook
Is this not an issue that would prevent such an update for the time being?
This package is part of the ongoing testing transition known as auto-qtbase-
opensource-src. Please avoid uploads unrelated to this transition, they would
likely delay it and require supplementary work from the
On 2024-04-20 at 16:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 07:54 -0400, P. J. McDermott wrote:
> > Then the salvage procedure can play out for the full 28+ days
> > specified
> > by developers-reference (21 days to allow the maintainer to object
> > followed by a DELAYED/7
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
On 26/11/2023 13:06, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Chris Boot wrote...
[...]
I'll upgrade the bug to RC when I upload ppp-2.5.0 to unstable.
Okay, just let me know when it's a good time to upload an updated
pptpd package.
Hi Christoph,
I've
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.03.11-2.1
root@recovery:~# lvcreate --config 'local/extra_system_id=["hub"]' -L 1G -n
test -Z y hub-early-b
Configuration setting "local/extra_system_id" unknown.
Cannot access VG hub-early-b with system ID hub with local system ID recovery.
root@recovery:~#
This
Package: tailscale
Version: 1.64.0
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed that some log entries are malformed, in that the %-specifiers
are not expanded. For example, today I see these lines in journalctl:
abr 20 18:12:14 schmee tailscaled[3288907]: [RATELIMIT] format("magicsock: %v
Control: reassign -1 ksh93u+m
Control: found -1 1.0.4-3
Control: found -1 1.0.8-1
Control: tag -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ksh93/ksh/issues/313
Forgot the "Control:".
Also: note the reassign due to the package rename of ksh to ksh93u+m
in September 2021. 1.0.4-3 is the
Source: netavark
Version: 1.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: found -1 1:4.2-2
20.04.2024 15:11, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: qemu
Version: 1:8.2.2+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
sbuild-build-depends
Control: tags 1066396 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lftp (versioned as 4.9.2-2.1) and uploaded it
to unstable. This the implements the minimal fix I sent to this bug
almost a month ago.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
reassign 1069353 plantuml
severity 1068999 serious
forcemerge 1068999 1069353
thanks
Hello,
In #1069353, the bug in #1068999 caused nncp to FTBFS in sid due to this
same issue. nncp uses plantuml to build documentation as part of its
build. The full build log is at
20.04.2024 15:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[..]
This is part of a mass rebuild, first building on arm64 and then on
armhf and armel. So I'm not suggesting anything. :-)
Aha.
Is this failing because the build is trying to build arch:all packages,
that can only be built on amd64? If so, the bug
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.www.debian@sideload.33mail.com
The Bookworm release notes instruct users to “upgrade” to the latest point
release of Bullseye prior to upgrading to Bookworm:
Control: retitle -1 nautilus: FTBFS on arm64:
test-nautilus-search-engine-tracker timed out
(cc'ing Lucas in case whatever heuristics are parsing the log can be
improved)
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 14:09:18 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > (tracker-miner-fs-3:3061640):
Source: haskell-hoogle
Version: 5.0.18.3+dfsg1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: gpaw
Version: 24.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ipsvd
Version: 1.0.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: firejail
Version: 0.9.72-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: socket-wrapper
Version: 1.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: iitii
Version: 0.0+git20191030.85209e0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: rust-libpulse-binding
Version: 2.28.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: purelibc
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: libeatmydata
Version: 131-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: haskell-lambdabot-haskell-plugins
Version: 5.3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant
Source: blobwars
Version: 2.00-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++
Source: holes
Version: 0.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: haskell-warp
Version: 3.3.25-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: dune-uggrid
Version: 2.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: mumps
Version: 5.6.2-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: bitshuffle
Version: 0.5.1-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: haskell-hpack
Version: 0.35.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: tcmu
Version: 1.5.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libalog
Version: 0.6.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pcscada
Version: 0.7.7-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gprbuild
Version: 2024.1.20231009-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: anet
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
1 - 100 of 346 matches
Mail list logo
