Source: poppler
Version: 0.24.5-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Checking the man page with a script
* What was the outcome of this action?
Found some typographical mistakes
##
Changes:
Removed space at the end of a line
Source: poppler
Version: 0.24.5-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Checking the man page with a script
* What was the outcome of this action?
Saw some typographical mistakes
##
Changes:
Changed .. to ...
Reduced two word spaces
Source: util-linux
Version: 2.24.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Checking the man page with a script
* What was the outcome of this action?
Some (typing) mistakes
##
Changes:
Space at end of lines removed
-- changed to \-\- if
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 05:21:41PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/16/2014 02:03 PM, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Source: util-linux Version: 2.24.1
There is no 2.24.1 in debian. Did you mean 2.20.1-5.6?
No. I used the latest version
Package: groff
Version: 1.22.2-5
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Reading the files
* What was the outcome of this action?
Misleading name for the character \-
The name minus (sign) is used on page 7 in the Troff User's
Manual. Also in
Package: help2man
Version: 1.44.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Reading a resulting output (man page)
* What was the outcome of this action?
Noticed that an italic correction was missing before \fI (\,) and before
(or after) the change
The patch tag should be removed, as I forgot to remove it.
--
Bjarni I. Gislason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: x11-xkb-utils
Version: 7.7+1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Reading the man page
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Checked the manual with a script
* What was the outcome of this
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:52:40PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
[...]
You can open a new bug (just one for all the changes should be
enough) at https://bugs.freedesktop.org, poppler product. Feel free
to provide the bug number/link, so I can track it.
The number is 81761
--
Bjarni I.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:57:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
[...]
--
763668: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763668
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
The symptoms
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:06:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
[...]
--
765426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
This bug
Package: procps
Version: 1:3.3.9-7
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Looking at the output of top
* What was the outcome of this action?
For example,
...
%Cpu(s): 0.2 us, 0.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 99.3 id, 0.2 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem:157844
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.0.2-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Using a script that contains man ... 2 file
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Called the script with arguments -a ...
* What was the
Package: linux-source-3.2
Version: 3.2.63-1
Severity: normal
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===1378243998==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Dear Maintainer,
* What
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.25.1-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Using a script containing whereis -b -m -M ... -B ... -f ...
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Tested as root following command
Package: mount
Version: 2.25.1-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Case described in Debian bug nr. 763668
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Put a floppy into the drive, mounted, changed to the mounted
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.20.1-5.8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
The light of the floppy drive lit up and there was noise two times when
booting
Following was in the kern.log:
Sep 18 20:32:52 jeti kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.25.2-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
whereis something outputs
something:
This output contains no (new) information, so it is more informative
to have it empty. Empty output is what (a user of) the philosophy of
Unix-like operating systems expect.
It
Package: apt
Version: 1.0.9.3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Sending the output of 'apt-get' to a file instead of using 'script'.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
apt-get upgrade /tmp/upgrade
*
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.6.0
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
The header line Subject is changed into quoted printable when the
line is continued on the second line ('folded'), even if the text is
pure US-ASCII.
This makes the copy of the mail less
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 03:30:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 00:02 +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:06:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
[...]
--
765426: http
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.0.2-4
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I changed the owner of /usr/bin/man and /usr/bin/mandb from man
to root with dpkg-reconfigure man-db (answered the question about
setuid man with no).
* What exactly did you do (or
This behaviour was caused by the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable, that
contained /usr/local/lib/. An older version libpipeline.so.1.2.1
was there, so it has been used until now.
--
Bjarni I. Gislason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 06:41:39PM +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 03:30:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 00:02 +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:06:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
Thank you
Package: udev
Version: 215-8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Reading a floppy in a built-in drive
* What was the outcome of this action?
Read access was denied for a regular user in group floppy
* What outcome did you expect instead?
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:57:53PM +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
...
is removed (except for items floppy) as this is crazy; adding about
60700 lines of text which have no obvious relevance for this bug. If
The named number actually applies to the number of bytes. Revised
number
Package: bash
Version: 4.3-11+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Issuing man bash # man is a script.
* What was the outcome of this action?
Some warnings from nroff or groff.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
Free of errors
Package: info
Version: 5.2.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Issuing command info coreutils.
* What was the outcome of this action?
Output from info coreutils begins with chapter 2.14.
Output from info wdiff begins with chapter 2.1.
Package: tar
Version: 1.27.1-2+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
(The bug about empty lines is also mentioned in bugs 711725, 720877,
and 766016)
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warnings from man --warnings=w --no-justification tar with
MANOPT=--no-hyphenation
Package: libselinux1
Version: 2.4-1 and 2.3-2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
1) A panic in the kernel =4.0 in the booting process
2) An line on the screen that was neither in the kern.log nor
boot.
#
This error could be a cause for a
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.0.2-5
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Greater line numbers were shown for lines in error when some options
were used with man.
###
When man adds lines to the input stream, the line numbers of the
output are
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.25.2-6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
This is an old bug.
In the file /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh
head and tail are not available if /usr is not on the mounted
root partition.
Use sed instead, for example
sed -n -e
Package: linux-source-3.16
Version: 3.16.7-ckt11-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Columns should be aligned
Content of /proc/cgroups:
#subsys_namehierarchy num_cgroups enabled
cpuset 0 1 1
cpu 0 1 1
cpuacct 0 1 1
memory 0 1
Package: dash
Version: 0.5.7-4+b1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A bug in a script.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Run the script.
* What was the outcome of this action?
A diagnostic message
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u4
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The general fact is mentioned in the GNU Coding Standard.
An appropriate word is (in)valid.
Examples from "/usr/share/lintian/":
checks/files.desc:Tag: run-parts-cron-filename-contains-illegal-chars
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The word "(il)legal" is too often used in a wrong sense, both in
documentation, diagnostic messages, and in a code as a part of a name
of an identifier.
This should be changed to a correct name, like "(in)valid",
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.0.2-5
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The command "man -w man" shows only one location but there are more.
/usr/share/man/man1/man.1.gz
The same applies to "groff", "hostname", "locale", and "time".
The manual explains the option "-w" thus:
Don't
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 05:54:35PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Axel Beckert writes:
>
> > I'd restrict it to packaging (i.e. the debian/ directory) and explicitly
> > exclude the file debian/copyright as any appearance of the word "legal"
> > or "illegal" in there is very
Package: smbios-utils
Version: 2.2.28-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Lines longer than 80 characters in the file
"/usr/share/doc/smbios-utils/copyright" are:
copyright: line 130 length 238
copyright: line 134 length 159
copyright: line 137 length 88
copyright: line 138
Package: python-libsmbios
Version: 2.2.28-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Lines that are longer than 80 characters are in the file
"/usr/share/doc/python-libsmbios/copyright":
copyright: line 130 length 238
copyright: line 134 length 159
copyright: line 137 length 88
copyright:
Package: libsmbios2
Version: 2.2.28-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
In the file "/usr/share/doc/libsmbios2/copyright" the indicated lines
are too long (longer than 80 characters):
copyright: line 130 length 238
copyright: line 134 length 159
copyright: line 137 length 88
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 01:02:00AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Him
>
> Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> > The word "(il)legal" is too often used in a wrong sense, both in
> > documentation, diagnostic messages, and in a code as a part of a name
> > of an ident
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:14:43PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarn...@rhi.hi.is>, 2015-10-11, 01:52:
> > * What outcome did you expect instead?
> >
> > That the environmental variable "TMPDIR" retains its value.
>
> Lintian
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.0.2-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Added an ".ab " line to a man-page.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
issued "man " or "man -l "
* What was the outcome of this
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:42:39PM +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:14:43PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarn...@rhi.hi.is>, 2015-10-11, 01:52:
> > > * What outcome did you expect instead?
> > >
> > &g
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u4
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Seeking an error that came when executing "lintian"
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
The folowing simple script shows the
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u4
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Seeking an error that came when executing "lintian".
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
The folowing simple script shows the
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.3-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
On the web-page "lintian.debian.org", tag
"manpage-has-errors-from-man" an example with this option is presented
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Package: dash
Version: 0.5.7-4+b1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Figuring out an error in "lintian".
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Issuing the script
#!/bin/dash
set -u
unset TMPDIR
echo TMPDIR is
tags patch
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:21:37AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
tags 660790 +wontfix
thanks
Hi Luca, and thanks for your bugreport,
Le 21.02.2012 22:42, Luca Capello a écrit :
As you can see, the leading space is not respected. I think this is
because
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:25:07AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:57:25 +0000 Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
>
> > aptitude changelog apt ...
>
> Does this always produce the same outcome?
>
Yes, at least three times.
> > Output was "Il
Package: docbook-xsl
Version: 1.78.1+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
This is related to Debian bug #569828, which is number 1120 upstream.
Dear Maintainer,
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
For example "man usb_copy_descriptors". Manual
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.6.3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
"reportbug" puts this in front of my report when it is used to
incorporate attachment:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===0054729797023488166==
Package: bootlogd
Version: 2.88dsf-59
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Checking the file /var/log/boot
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
The usual last line "[] Stopping boot logger:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.7.5-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
aptitude changelog apt ...
* What was the outcome of this action?
Output was "Illegal instruction" with a return value of 132.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 06:12:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarn...@rhi.hi.is> writes:
>
> > It is not enough to check just the Debian part of a package. The
> > part that comes from upstream should be scrutinized.
>
> If you want to
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:47:23AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:47:25PM +0000, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:40:19PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > Hi, thanks for getting back in touch.
> > >
> >
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:40:19PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Hi, thanks for getting back in touch.
>
> I'm hoping to carry this patch in the next smartmontools upload. Somebody
> needs
> to refresh it as ~50% of the hunks no longer apply to the current
> smartd.conf.5.
>
I can make a
Package: mg
Version: 20150323-2+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Writing some lines that all started on a new line, following
recommendations for writing man-pages.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:50:56AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
[...]
> This is a substantial amount of the patch (in lines-changed terms).
> Is there a technical reason for this?
Yes.
In man-pages the technical issue is to have
every sentence begin on a new line
or (worse) sentences are
More environmental variables are needed:
export MANWIDTH=80
export MAN_KEEP_STDERR=y
--
Bjarni I. Gislason
Package: bash
Version: 4.3-14+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
MANOPT=--no-hyphenation --warnings=w man bash
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
gunzip -c /usr/share/man/man1/bash.1.gz | groff
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 09:09:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
>
> As just discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/826596 it seems the output
> is printed as escaped ascii codes when the locale (on the receiving side)
> does not consider a character printable.
>
Not the locale,
Source: util-linux
Version: 2.28.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A bug in the output of "wall" as the letter "ÿ" was output as '\377'.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Compiled the
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:39:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 perl-modules
>
> [CCing Russ as upstream for podlators.]
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 05:07:29PM +0000, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> >* What led up to the situation?
> >
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:40:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarn...@rhi.hi.is> writes:
>
> > 1) The comment is wrong, because the code was changed from what it
> > originally was (in my patch in the original bug report; see the last
> > l
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.5-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A warning was issued.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
For example "man perl" with "MAN_KEEP_STDERR=yes"
* What was the outcome of
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:24:57AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
>
> > I can see that that is attempting to avoid a warning. However, it is
> > not quite correct. It should probably be something like this instead:
>
> > .if !r F .nr F 0
>
> > I
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:09:37AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:17:18PM +0000, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:40:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Apologies for the regression; this is the confluence of two things th
The cause of this error is that "man" converts the input to "UTF-8"
although the output expects "latin1" (iso-8859-1). So the character \[la] gets
the code u27E8, which does not exist in the used font.
INPUT FILE:
.TH angle-test 1 2017-07-06
.pl 5
.fchar \[la] <
Angle test with character
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.6.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
man groff_diff
* What was the outcome of this action?
Saw "delim $$" in the output
* What outcome did you expect instead?
Correct display of equations.
###
The options
Package: xterm
Version: 330-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warnings from "nroff".
###
Changes in the patch:
Remove space at end of lines.
Fix warning from man/groff
:64: warning: number register `.I' not defined
:5034: warning:
Package: xserver-common
Version: 2:1.19.3-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warnings from "nroff" (in "man").
###
Fix warnings from "nroff/groff":
:540: warning [p 8, 2.8i]: can't break line
:586: warning [p 8, 10.3i, div `an-div', 0.0i]:
Package: ispell
Version: 3.4.00-6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer (Debian and upstream),
* What led up to the situation?
Saw a word repeted
###
Input file is ispell.1X
Remove space at end of lines.
521:.I ispell
795:then the line contains a '+', a space, and the root word.
Package: perl-modules-5.26
Version: 5.26.0-5
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
"man gcc" with
MAN_KEEP_STDERR=yes
MANOPT=--encoding=latin1 --no-hyphenation --warnings=w --no-justification
MANWIDTH=80
* What was the outcome of this action?
Package: gcc-6-doc
Version: 6.3.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
"man gcc" with
MAN_KEEP_STDERR=yes
MANOPT=--encoding=latin1 --no-hyphenation --warnings=w --no-justification
MANWIDTH=80
* What was the outcome of this action?
:3310:
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.43.4-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
"groff" and "man" were given the freedom of speach (-ww,
MAN_KEEP_STDERR=yes) and spoke up. One kind of an error suggests that
others might be there.
* What exactly did
Package: grep
Version: 2.27-2
Severity: minor
"[gn]roff" (inside "man") reported:
:23: warning: macro `Dt' not defined
The 23th line is:
.TH GREP 1 \*(Dt "GNU grep 2.27" "User Commands"
The parent-line in the source file "grep.1.in" is:
.TH GREP 1 @UPDATED@ "GNU grep @VERSION@" "User
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.6.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Seeing '?' and '??' around some words
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Running "man -mandoc groff_mdoc"
* What was the outcome of
Package: man-db
Version: 2.7.6.1-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
about the output of "man -d -l ".
The location of the is already known.
There are so many irrelevant lines about where the location of the input
file could be, that it makes it more difficult and time consuming to spot
Package: ntpdate
Version: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Strange string "rsion" in the output.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
command: ntpdate --version
* What was the outcome of
Package: bison++
Version: 1.21.11-4+b1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Compilation of "groff"
* What was the outcome of this action?
Some warnings from the compiler.
This should be fixed, or if correct, an explanation should be added to the
Package: unrar
Version: 1:5.5.8-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Some warnings from "test-groff" (development version of "groff"):
:9 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:21 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:42
Package: nn
Version: 6.7.3-10+b2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
chk_manuals: Output is from: test-groff -b -e -mandoc -T utf8 -rF0 -t -w w -z
:4039 (macro IR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:4321 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2018.20180416.47457-3+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warnings from "groff":
Input file is disdvi.1
Test nr. 2:
:16 (macro IR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:18 (macro IR): only 1 argument, but
Package: liblockfile-bin
Version: 1.14-1.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warnings from "groff":
:6 (macro RB): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:13 (macro RB): only 1 argument, but more are expected
Output is from: test-groff -b -e
Package: bsdmainutils
Version: 11.1.2+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warning from "troff":
troff: :310: warning: macro 'FL' not defined
Output is from: test-groff -b -e -mandoc -T utf8 -rF0 -t -w w -z
["test-groff" is a developmental
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:51:06AM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 25.05.2018 um 04:36 teilte Bjarni Ingi Gislason mit:
>
> Hi,
>
> >Dear Maintainer,
> >
> >* What led up to the situation?
> >
> > Warning from "groff":
> >
> T
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.19.0.5+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warnings from "groff":
:44 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:62 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:68 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2018.20180416.47457-3+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warning from "groff":
:60 (macro IR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
Output is from: test-groff -b -e -mandoc -T utf8 -rF0 -t -w w -z
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.19.0.5+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warning from "groff":
:148 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:181 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
Output is from: test-groff -b -e -mandoc
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.19.0.5+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warnings from "groff":
:133 (macro IR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:210 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:279 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more
Package: reportbug
Version: 7.1.10
Severity: minor
Make the line "Dear Maintainer" more specific and mention what
distribution is meant, for example by using "Dear Debian maintainer".
This line is in the file "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reportbug/utils.py".
See an answer to the bug
Package: mandoc
Version: 1.14.3-4
Severity: important
Output from "mandoc -mdoc -T man groff_mdoc.7":
mandoc: mdoc_man.c:678: print_node: Assertion `n->tok >= MDOC_Dd && n->tok <
MDOC_MAX' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:40:06AM -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
> Package: bash
> Version: 3.2-5
> Severity: normal
>
> Option --verbose is not documented in manpage. It says only that it's the
> same
> of -v.
>
Why has this report not been closed. It reports no error or a
Package: hdparm
Version: 9.56+ds-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A warning from "groff":
:9 (macro BI): only 1 argument, but more are
expected
Output is from: test-groff -b -e -mandoc -T utf8 -rF0 -t -w w -z
[ "test-groff" is a
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:24:52PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello Bjarni,
> Thankyou for your three bug reports. I have applied two, but the ps one
> was not the patch, just a text file showing the problems again.
> So, most of the changes have been applied to the upstream procps
>
Package: hostname
Version: 3.20
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warnings from "groff":
:65 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:69 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
:71 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are
Package: gpg-agent
Version: 2.2.5-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Warning from "groff":
:19 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
Output is from: test-groff -b -e -mandoc -T utf8 -rF0 -t -w w -z
[ "test-groff" is a
r further fixes, or
> this might get a bit out of control. :) ]
>
I usually only test for warnings from "groff". If there are some, I run
the whole testing script on the man pages, if there are not too many.
Otherwise just patches to eliminate the warnings.
> On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 22
201 - 300 of 788 matches
Mail list logo