gnome-gmail, in both sid and testing, is now terminating with this error.
The name org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service
files.
Is there a new required dependency?
I've reworked retest-manager for a rebase to 'develop', removing
changes to slave idle and config defaults.
https://github.com/davesteele/piuparts/commits/retest-manager
f91dd37 Update TODO - log rescheduling done
1ce857e Update master cron to run reschedule_oldest_logs often.
ae439a6 Add unit
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.45
Tags: patch
thanks
piuparts_slave_run and piuparts_slave_join are still pointing into the
obsolete org directory. Patch fixes this, and adds an optional command
line argument for multiple slave support.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
...
I'd prefer seperate branches, but oh well...
...
... havent merged 750ea46 and cb204bb as they need 479dc87 which merges rather
dirty with the other changes merged from Andreas today.
So please rebase and I'll
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.44
Tags: patch
The changes in the report-performance branch speed up marginal
piuparts-report runs on my VM by 10x.
https://github.com/davesteele/piuparts/commits/report-performance
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
It's minor, but clean commits are really shiny.
Shiny-erness acheived.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Then the next I want to merge is probably 652934, but it looks like at least
479dc870d64375775bf9d4a1bc1d420366066e41 needs a rebase.
piuparts-server rebased to develop.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
thanks, merged into develop + pushed. now testing it some more and then will
deploy on piatti, curious for the speedup! :-)
Woot! From 87 minutes to 10.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
I've just cherry-picked 89926a72e5675218abfbbd6dce50dba0292c43ad and then
stopped at 4da7f074ba4d8bba26def132831d64b31fa6c9c8 as you added a new cron
file without deleting the old ones. Which I like in a way, as it
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Fixing the changelog would be trivial for me, but I
believe you should provide clean patches
cleaned
Also I do think
that / is good default...
I'm not comfortable making that change, for the reasons I've
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
On 2012-06-13 02:53, Dave Steele wrote:
pushed
changes
working
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
mv debian/{install,manpages} debian/piuparts.*
piuparts-server.postinst:
Never ever touch /home !
put the users in /var/lib/something
use adduser --system
don't manually check /etc/{passwd,group}, let adduser do
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Sonntag, 17. Juni 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
postinst should be able to setup ~piupartss/.ssh/known_hosts from /etc/ssh
that's a good idea, recording it in TODO. even if only for localhost :)
You should do one
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
I'm very sorry it took me so long to come back to this and now I also can only
say: can you please rebase your piuparts-server branch on the latest develop
branch, which has piatti.git included?!
No problem
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.44
Tags: patch
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
piuparts-report is a bit of a resource hog, both in terms of RAM usage
and clock time. There is a loop in the main routine that maintains an
array of Section objects, which is never accessed. Removing
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
On 2012-05-22 14:35, Holger Levsen wrote:
this usertag is useless :)
Yeah. It's just that this really applies to piuparts-something, and
I didn't want it to get lost.
looking at the code it seems your right, but
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
merging was more annoying then it should have been, cause that branch had
other changes not yet in develop... :/
I didn't expect it to beat out the packaging commits. -report has many
changes in there.
At least the
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.44
Tags: patch
piuparts.d.o will not test a package if one or more of its
dependencies have previously failed, or is in turn blocked by a
failure. Failed packages with high reverse dependency counts can
therefore cause a large number of packages to be blocked from
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.43
Severity: Normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
A quick review. The packages docbook-xsl and sgml-data have been
persistently failing piuparts testing, and are currently responsible
for 490 packages being held in dependency-failed-testing in
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
On 2012-05-05 15:48, Dave Steele wrote:
That doesn't seem like a fair thing to do to dpkg.
It's still a bug in dpkg, even if it's not trivial to fix.
...
Is there a reason for doing the purges in that order
Severity 671629 wishlist
thanks
OK. Sounds like a plan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: docbook-xsl
Version: 1.75.2+dfsg-5
Severity: Important
Tags: patch
Fix file postrm attached, tested against 1.75.2+dfsg-5 (sid) and
1.76.0~RC1+dfsg-1 (experimental).
docbook-xsl has a Piuparts sid state of state-failed-testing, dating
back to at least last May:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
...
And, currently your branch consists of 5 commits, I'd really like to find a
way to merge the piatti.git repo with keeping it's history... this should be
possible somehow.
Sorry for the delay - I have been
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
I did this:
cd $piuparts.git
# create an empty branch
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/piatti.git
rm .git/index
git clean -fdx
# add piatti.git as new remote
git remote add piatti.git
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
... +
+if [ $1 = remove ]
+then
+ rm -f /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml* || :
+ rm -f /etc/sgml/sgml-data* || :
fi
This patch seems to remove configuration files unconditionally on remove.
This seems wrong
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: question about your patch
To: Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
configuration files should
Fixed patch attached
diff -ur sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/changelog sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/changelog
--- sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/changelog 2011-11-02 22:14:48.124000413 -0400
+++ sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/changelog 2011-11-02 22:36:55.887998903 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+sgml-data (2.0.7) unstable;
Package: menu
Version: 2.1.45
Tags: patch
The package does not remove the pid file on 'remove', and therefore
fails Piuparts. A postrm script is attached which deletes this file.
'menu' has about 120 reverse dependencies. Of these, over 90 are being
held in the Piuparts sid state of
Package: iceweasel
Version: 8.0-3
Tags: patch
iceweasel is failing in Piuparts sid with the following error:
1m16.0s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
/usr/lib/iceweasel owned by: iceweasel
/usr/lib/iceweasel/.autoreg not owned
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-13.13
Severity: Important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
A very large number (~30,000) of packages at piuparts.debian.org,
which are otherwise passing all tests, are showing a warning for the
broken symlink /etc/motd -
Package: amule-gnome-support
Version: 2.3.1-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
The Piuparts sid log at piuparts.d.o has a broken symlink failure for:
/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-defoma.conf - /var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d/fonts.conf
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thanks, so I've merged the next one... but then I looked at
e6444734909a6074f9f768f0c32ffc56d3a2017e and found several points I disliked,
want improved or plainly reject:
OK, I think I can return to this
tags 670150 patch
severity 670150 normal
thanks
I have a candidate implementation of a package retest manager
available in my retest-manager branch:
https://github.com/davesteele/piuparts/tree/retest-manager
The architecture breaks down as follows:
- The master gains idle support by
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
And also because atm we have a huge backlog in processing packages, as people
upload like crazy (the wheezy freeze is coming) and piatti cannot keep up.
Thus rescheduling old logs has low prio for me atm :)
That's
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
I want to be able to do apt-get install... and get a working setup.
I think we are close to being there.
But, honestly, other than an unchecked reference
to ssh-keygen, I don't see a policy violation in it.
...
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
I have this staged. Look right?
yup! :-)
pushed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System
ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org
...
http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/pass/fontconfig-config_2.8.0-3.log doesnt show
a broken symlink anymore, thus
The attached patch modifies dh_installxmlcatalogs to make /etc/xml
solely owned by xml-core, and cleanly removes the directory on purge.
This passes piuparts cleanly for the worst dependency blockers,
docbook-xsl and sgml-data.
Similar changes are needed for /etc/sgml handling by
Package: openjdk-6-jre-headless
Version: 6-6b23~pre11
Tags: patch
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
openjdk-6-jre-headless in sid is failing Piuparts with the following log entry
6m7.7s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
/etc/.java not
I can confirm that ca-certificates-java tests as clear of this bug
report. The package needs to be retested on piuparts.d.o.
ca-certificates-java shares mutual dependencies with
openjdk-6-jre-headless. Since the latter currently contains a piuparts
failure, it should be tested before the former.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 11/19/2011 11:17 PM, Dave Steele wrote:
Package: openjdk-6-jre-headless
Version: 6-6b23~pre11
...
openjdk-6-jre-headless in sid is failing Piuparts with the following log
entry
6m7.7s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.41
Severity: minor
The piuparts-slave application peeks into the master 'reserved'
directory to decide whether to idle or not between runs. If there are
no files found in that directory, then the program sleeps for
idle-sleep seconds before requesting more files from
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote:
...
As an alternative, Section.run() could return the number of packages
processed, and the main loop could sleep iff that number is 0,
indicating that the master had no work to assign.
A git branch, based off of 'develop
Note that gnustep-base-common also fails on this directory:
0m42.3s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
/etc/xml owned by: xml-core, gnustep-base-common
gnustep-base-common is blocking 93 packages in Piuparts sid state
dependency-failed-testing, independent of those
Package: python-gi
Version: 3.0.2-4
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
python-gi is failing piuparts with a large number of leftover owned
and unowned files after a purge.
http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/python-gi_3.0.2-4.log
...
0m30.6s ERROR: FAIL:
Package: libreoffice-core
Version: 1:3.4.4-2
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
libreoffice-core is failing piuparts with the following log messages
on piuparts.d.o:
1m59.2s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
/var/lib/libreoffice
feature/package-master-slave has been rebased to piuparts develop, and
merged with piatti develop.
g...@github.com:davesteele/piuparts.git
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unfortunately this is a monolithic commit - can you split this in a
series of small commits?
Not easily. I could go back and make a separate commit for bringing in
piatti.git, then show changes against that in a separate commit. Is
that sufficient?
I am seeing two issues in testing this code
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately this is a monolithic commit - can you split this in a
series of small commits?
OK, the piuparts-server patch is shown separately in
https://github.com/davesteele/piuparts/tree/piuparts-server
g
Package: fontconfig-config
Version: 2.8.0-3
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
A very large number (6,000+) of sid packages at piuparts.debian.org,
which are otherwise passing all tests, are showing the same broken symlink
warning for the same symlink.
typo error - fontconfig-config.postinst and fontconfig-config.postrm
Also, local testing was on sid.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.42
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Tags: patch
A piuparts branch including packaging for the piuparts server master
and slave is available at
git://github.com/davesteele/piuparts.git- branch
feature/package-master-slave
The
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.43
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The following branch defines a patch which will cause
piuparts-slave-py to default to 'sid' if no 'distro' is defined.
g...@github.com:davesteele/piuparts.git - branch slave-default-distro
Without the patch, Section.run()
Package: piuparts-master
Version: 0.53
Severity: grave
thanks
Recent versions of apache2 break the piuparts-master web
configuration. It looks like this is caused by all 2.44 versions of
apache2.
See the link below for instruction.
I also had to add a Require line.
It appears that a .conf
Lintian feedback
W: piuparts-master: apache2-reverse-dependency-uses-obsolete-directory
etc/apache2/conf.d/piuparts.apache
W: piuparts-master: non-standard-apache2-configuration-name
piuparts.apache != piuparts-master.conf
W: piuparts-master:
found 705977 0.53
thanks
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
I've been wanting to do this, but was worried about conversations re
the delay in calc_rrdep_counts(). Note that it may be sped up ~2X for
smaller package_names lists by saving rrdep_list and
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2013-06-15 23:19, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
Patches welcome. :-)
On Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
Ping - branches submitted 3
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
... I have merged this into develop now (and pushed).
Thanks, and sorry about my changelog snafu.
Note that the bug entry also includes rdep-chain-len, another package
selection optimization. Andreas had asked for it
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Montag, 17. Juni 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
Note that the bug entry also includes rdep-chain-len, another package
selection optimization.
can you please point me to the commits? Best in a new branch
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Dienstag, 18. Juni 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
rdep-chain-len (2):
e45679f piupartslib/packagesdb.py - Add rdep chain length metric calc.
e8900a0 piupartslib/packages.db - Prioritize by rdep chain len
)
* Include cloudprint-service init.d support.
-- David Steele dste...@gmail.com Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:42:12 -0400
Regards,
Dave Steele
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
An RFS has been submitted as #712734
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: piuparts-slave
Version: 0.53
Severity: important
If a distribution tar file is expired when multiple slaves are
launched with piuparts_slave_run, there is a good chance that the
replacement tar will be corrupt.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
I do however test every release by running --all on my own system.
Currently adequate emits tags for about 3% packages here.
3% of 40k means... about 1200 issues to be fixed. whoa. So we'll indeed start
with warnings
Package: debhelper
Version: 9.20120312
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-xml-sgml-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org,
piuparts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
thanks
Management of the /etc/sgml directory by dh_installcatalogs typically
causes the following piuparts error for packages
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
This is actually a bug in dpkg, see the summary I posted in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316521#143
IMHO it should be fixed there instead of working around it in other tools.
I agree with your
Hi,
there were thoughts to move rescheduling of old logs into the master,
here come a few more.
I'm working on a flexible-retest candidate that works closer to the
current design, while maintaining priority for new packages, and
aggressively retesting the rest of the time. It keeps the
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote:
...
Why not fix sensible-lomua.diff instead instead of adding a new patch which
in fact
removes sensible-lomua.diff?
...
But I see the point
Package: piuparts
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
thanks
Packages with high reverse dependency counts can cause known problem
issue lists to balloon. Providing rdep visibility in the issue report
can highlight these problems, making it much easier to pare the list
down.
The well-known git branch
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
On 2013-01-19 22:06, Dave Steele wrote:
...
Now that you have access to the package DB, can you add a PTS link for
each failing package? These need to be src based ...
Yes, but it would involve duplicating a bit
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
...
What I'd like to see is (in probable order of implementation)
* piuparts-report discovering all existing known problem descriptions
instead of hardcoding them
- need to add ordering information somehow, perhaps
Package: piuparts
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
thanks
Provide better visibility to problems with broken symlinks in packages
by raising the condition from an issue to an error on piatti.
Per
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/2013-January/003424.html
, the failed count
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Sonntag, 3. März 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
If I parse
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
please rebase dave/multiple-slaves - or should we rather base it on
andreas/preview/multislaves?
It looks like Andreas is using some of the concepts in a better
framework. I'd recommend working from his branch.
The
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi,
debsums 2.0.51~bpo60+1 has been installed on piatti now, shall we close
#701150? Reschedule some logs?
I see that gnome-icon-theme is passing now. The problem appears to be gone.
I'd close after rescheduling
Multiple slave support in piuparts_slave_run and piuparts_slave_join is
rebased in
https://github.com/davesteele/piuparts/tree/multiple-slaves
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
If we want to make this error visible, we should enable it at some point
*and* recycle the logs immediately *and* have a mass-bug-filing prepared
(i.e. discussed
to be rebased into
well-known.
fixup-well
8fc8df2 fixup - fix method arguments for recheck* parameters
b897262 fixup - fix filtered()
a1b381d fixup - delete the comment that .kprn is temporary
Andreas, per your wishlist:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Samstag, 26. Januar 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
Provide better visibility to problems with broken symlinks in packages
by raising the condition from an issue to an error on piatti.
...
that's good
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
...
these are quite some different changes, can you please isolate the commits for
Sort known issues by reverse dependency count and rebase them onto current
develop?!
The new serial branches sort-issues-by-rdep and
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
...
these are quite some different changes, can you please isolate the commits
for
Sort known issues by reverse dependency count and rebase them
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
It probably causes an issue with open file descriptors: only plots for
the first 62 sections are generated, thereafter rpy fails:
I recall other fd's failing to be closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
this work looks really promising and I'm curious to try it some day on
my instance.
But as I wrote before there is no need to reimplement the .tpl
generation in python. Instead these intermediate files should go away
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
+if self.inc_re.search( logbody, re.MULTILINE ):
+for line in logbody.splitlines():
+if self.inc_re.search( line ):
+if self.exc_re == None \
+
package: piuparts
severity: normal
While looking at the piatti piuparts report Andreas pointed to today,
I noticed that failures are racking up for debsums modifications.
The debsums man page, under Caveats, says that files which have been
replaced by another package may be erroneously reported
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
Control: block -1 by 689508 689202
debsums (2.0.49) unstable; urgency=low
* when querying dpkg-divert include the user specified root filesystem
in --admindir (Closes: #632463)
piatti is running 2.0.48+nmu3
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2013-02-22 01:58, Dave Steele wrote:
Concerning what is currently in Holger's queue:
I've reworked based on Andreas' issues related to
detect_well_known_errors and rdeps. Comments related to piupartslib
and piuparts
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
extra bonus points if you could tell how many commits it are in
each branch, due to rebase its rather easy for me to find out, but becoming
this told would be even better ;)
As I have been keeping up with the changes
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
In general I think we should allow the flexibility to have a per-section
known-problems-directory setting, so each report Section should generate
its own problem list and not get a global one passed
OK, but out of
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
which means, we should have a proxy = ... config setting :-)
It should be made clear that the use of a caching proxy can lead to
packagesdb seeing an inconsistent repository.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2013-01-26 22:37, Dave Steele wrote:
If we want to make this error visible, we should enable it at some point
*and* recycle the logs immediately *and* have a mass-bug-filing prepared
(i.e. discussed+agreed on debian
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
In branch report-problem_integration you have
4db22544 piuparts-report - add known Problems class list to Section.
That should be dropped, ...
This is where we have been talking past each other for the last week.
That
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.43
Severity: Normal
Tags: patch
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Until the purging order issue is resolved, packages should be expected
to fail if they use a directory established by a non-essential
dependency. In the interim, it would be useful to
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
Control: severity 715110 normal
Control: severity 715122 normal
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 05:01:15AM +, David Steele wrote:
Package: libsamba-util-dev
Version: 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2
Severity: serious
User:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 04:10:16 -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
I guess the next step is a clearer statement of consensus on what to do next.
My position - I believe that the bug submittal, and the current
severity
Package: python-rpy
Version: 1.0.3-24
Severity: important
thanks
The latest version of the python rpy module in sid fails to import.
$ python
Python 2.7.3 (default, Mar 4 2013, 14:57:34)
[GCC 4.7.2] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import rpy
Traceback
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
On 20 April 2013 at 17:27, Dave Steele wrote:
...
I was a little afraid of this. RPy has _long_ been dead. I even patched it
for (IIRC) R 2.10 when the original version regexp could not deal with two
digits.
Could
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
On 20 April 2013 at 17:27, Dave Steele wrote:
Can you provide some pointers to an R neophyte on how to proceed?
1 -
https://github.com/davesteele
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
On 20 April 2013 at 19:05, Dave Steele wrote:
| On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org
wrote:
|
| Is this a valid
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
