Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
This is now fixed upstream for next major version:
https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/commit/bc9b012694eb81db7f154754557caf3ca431491f
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Il 11/06/2024 17:01, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Please import the latest release 6.2.0, which has this integrated.
Don't forget to remove autoconf2.13 from the Build-Depends.
Hi, when I'll have time I'll start to upload it to experimental, I don't
have time to
++ header files. They
contain a superset of the information in the equivalent typelib file,
in a less efficient but easier-to-parse encoding. I suspect that
cinnamon-screensaver doesn't actually need this.
On #1057391, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
user testing cinnamon 6 on sid spotted -dev package in
gir1.2
Il 05/07/2024 15:56, Ferenc Wágner ha scritto:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:42:31 +0100 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
I saw on upstream git history that there was some improvements related
to badram output included in 6.10:
https://github.com/memtest86plus/memtest86plus/pull/178
Judging by its title
Hi, thanks for the report.
I think sshfs will be better in recommends instead depends as not all
use remote backup on ssh. Have it as depends also make unable to
uninstall it.
Is this okay or is there some other reason why it's better to be in depends?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description:
Il 22/07/2024 13:19, c.bu...@posteo.jp ha scritto:
Am 22.07.2024 12:23 schrieb Fabio Fantoni:
I think sshfs will be better in recommends instead depends as not all
use remote backup on ssh. Have it as depends also make unable to
uninstall it.
Is this okay or is there some other reason why it's
Il 09/07/2024 12:58, Simon McVittie ha scritto:
On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 at 12:32:22 +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 22/12/2023 23:26, Simon McVittie ha scritto:
On #1057391, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
user testing cinnamon 6 on sid spotted -dev package in
gir1.2-cscreensaver-1.0 actually not present, so
Il 27/07/2024 15:11, Simon McVittie ha scritto:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 14:35:26 +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Is correct and good the actual packaging (in experimental branch) in your
opinion?
Yes, it looks like reasonable packaging for a private library.
I have not reviewed in detail or tested
401 - 408 of 408 matches
Mail list logo
