; before
reading this bug report. (Closes: #720126)
* Patch README to explain how installed files relate to src:muse-el.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:58:45 -0400
Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
I just tested Hideki's patch and it looks good to me :-) In addition
to this bug, it closes #800790.
Cheers,
Nicholas
control: tags -1 confirmed
control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Oh my, I made a mistake back in April... Sorry Dimitri! While the
fix is available upstream, no Debian package yet installs it. Bug
#840302 has a nice patch.
Cheers,
Nicholas
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:04:17PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 05:23:45PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > Thank you for mentoring me to err on the side of caution :-) As a
> > rule, for Debian, is it most correct that the embedded version in the
> &g
P.S. I had already filed RFS Bug #861699. For future reference, which
is correct?
1) I. someone files an RFP, II. one takes ownership and retitles it to an
ITP, III. if one then needs a sponsor one drops ownership and retitles to
an RFS ... [ITP]
2) I and II remain the same, but instead of III,
Hi Antoine,
Elpa-writeroom-mode is ready to upload whenever you have the time.
It's available here:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/writeroom-mode
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/writeroo
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 07:33:13PM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Hello Nicholas,
>
> I re-enabled XFS, for Sid and for Experimental, and posted an unblock
> request to release.debian.org
>
> Best regards, Georges.
>
Thank you Georges!
--N
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Package: dh-make-elpa
Version: 0.7.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi Sean,
I thought I'd take a quick look at dh-make-elpa's create_docs, because
I've been using dh-make-elpa a lot recently. What do you think of
iteratively printing (filename\n) from a list generated from *.md and
*.org instead of checkin
control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 05:02:23PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:58:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "writegood-mode&q
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 07:29:40AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 05:41:06PM +0200, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
> > I've uploaded the package and took the reccomendations into consideration.
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfsmaintenance
>
> what is the state of
P.S. And the issues this package can exacerbate still exist:
"Subject: balancing every night broke balancing so now I can't balance anymore?"
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg65387.html
This sort of thing is why I don't want to support btrfsmaintenance for
Stretch, but Stretch+1 is pr
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:40:34PM -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
>
> * Package name: minecraft
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
> * URL : https://minecraft.net
> * Licen
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 18:40 -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > > Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
> >
> > * Package name: minecraft
> > Version : 0.1
> > Upstream Author : Ca
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Zebulon,
Have you already taken care to follow Mojang's trademark rules?
https://account.mojang.com/documents/brand_guidelines
Specifically I think one of their terms is that even non-commercial
software must very clearly state that it's unofficial and not
affiliat
Hi Nobuhiro,
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 08:10:59AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2017-05-03 7:11 GMT+09:00 Nicholas D Steeves :
> > Control: retitle -1 xserver-xorg-input-multitouch -- new version available
> >
>
> Current installed vetsion is 1.0~rc2+git2011
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Tagging as moreinfo while investigating a potential trademark
infringement issue. I will untag when this has been resolved.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: block -1 by 861772
Please do not upload this package yet. I'm blocking this RFP with an
RFS I filed, and have tagged it moreinfo while I investigate the
severity of a possible trademark infringement issue. I expect that to
be solved quickly, hopefully before you get back.
--N
signatu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
* Package name: gmailfeed
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Anthony Vital
* URL : https://github.com/anthon38/gmailfeed
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A plasmoid for the
Package: libkf5style5
Version: 5.28.0-1
Control: affects -1 kde-style-breeze emacs inkscape x11-apps
Dear KDE Team,
Thank you for your hard work. I hope that I'm filing this against the
right package... It might actually be Qt problem.
Steps to reproduce invisible text, from a fresh Stretch in
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:50:54AM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2017-03-13 07:13:09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Sebastian Ramacher
> > wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > >
> > > On 2017-03-12 13:31:24, lkcl wrote:
> > >> Pack
Hi,
I can confirm that as of 2.5.50 this is not yet fixed. I'd also like
to be able to set no-tag-display-limit in my lintianrc.
Cheers,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: owner -1
control: retitle -1 ITP: elpa-writeroom-mode -- distraction-free writing for
Emacs
Hi Antoine,
I've been using a moderately customised local copy of writeroom-mode
forked from upstream many years ago, so of course I'd love to maintain
an official elpafied Debian package of it.
control: -1 owner
control: -1 retitle ITP: elpa-writegood-mode -- Minor mode for Emacs to improve
English writing
Hi Antoine,
I'll do this one too, because it's something I'm interested in and
wish I had had as an undergrad. Y-a-t'il une version française?
C'est quelque dont j'apprécierais énor
control: pending -1
Hi Antoine,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:04:56AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2017-04-24 20:37:20, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > control: owner -1
> > control: retitle -1 ITP: elpa-writeroom-mode -- distraction-free writing
> > for Emacs
> >
&
control: tags -1 pending
Hi Antoine,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:06:50AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2017-04-24 20:46:13, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> > Y-a-t'il une version française?
> > C'est quelque dont j'apprécierais énormément!
>
> This is
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:37:12PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2017-04-25 11:17:28, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> >
> > It will take some time to learn how this one works, but another reason
> > I'm interested in maintaining writegood-mode is I'm cer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: elpa-writegood-mode
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : Artur Malabarba
URL : http://github.com/Malabarba/smart-mode-line
License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Elisp
Description : A powerful and beautiful mode-line for E
Package name: smart-mode-line
Version : 2.10.1
Upstream Author : Artur Malabarba
URL : http://github.com/Malabarba/smart-mode-line
License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Elisp
Description : A powerful and beautiful mode-line for Emacs
[corrected Package name and Ver
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Control: owner -1 !
Control: block 861174 by -1
Package name: elpa-find-file-in-project
Version : 5.2.7
Upstream Author : Will Farrington et al, Chen Bin is the current maintainer
URL : https://github.com/technomancy/find-file-in-project
Lic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
* Package name: elpa-poetry
Version : 0.14
Upstream Author : Bob Newell
* URL : http://www.bobnewell.net/filez/poetry.el
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: Elisp
Description : Poetry writing
Hi Sean,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 01:36:10PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Nicholas,
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 09:22:23PM -0400, Nicholas Steeves wrote:
> > The questions we need help with are at 2. and especially 4.
>
> Okay -- I'll answer those.
>
> > > 2. that version patch - really n
ith Debian Emacs Policy.
- Depend on emacsen-common (>= 2.0.8) instead of emacs.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:53:19 -0400
helm (2.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
Thank you,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:51:41AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Nicholas D Steeves dijo [Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 01:37:03PM -0400]:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
> >
> > * Package name: elpa-poetry
> > (...)
> &
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
Control: block 861124 by -1
* Package name: visual-fill-column
Version : 1.9
Upstream Author : Joost Kremers
* URL : https://github.com/joostkremers/visual-fill-column
* License : GPL-3
PA package that
needs a newer version of writegood-mode than this, Emacs should
download that updated version from MELPA, and hopefully that user will
file a bug requesting that we package that new upstream version.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:04:18 -0400
Cheers,
Nicholas
t there is zero ambiguity about what is covered by the
license. Upstream has applied it to their HEAD.
- This patch will be redundant when upstream tags 1.11.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Fri, 28 Apr 2017 23:10:12 -0400
Cheers,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: retitle -1 xserver-xorg-input-multitouch -- new version available
git log --pretty=oneline v1.0-rc2..v1.0-rc3
55ab6c4ecb43e6f2ec34b36533ef308d00a709e4 xf86-input-multitouch v1.0-rc3
4d87c041f6a232aa30528d70d4b9946d1824b4ed Four finger swipes in multitouch
afbbc4b9470869933223e3970c7a63f1c
Control: retitle -1 RFS: visual-fill-column/1.11-1 [ITP]
On second thought, please do not upload this release! I will wait
until 1.11 is tagged and the patch can be dropped. Please do not
close this bug, as I expect it to be tagged very soon; however, I
would appreciate if someone would claim ow
medium
* Initial release. (Closes: #861687)
* Add 0001-Update-claimed-version-important-for-integration-wit.patch
- Provides the correct version to GNU ELPA and MELPA to prevent
potential dependency resolution issues.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Wed, 03 May 2017 14:43:38 -0400
Thank you!
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-levels-of-customisation-options-in-R.patch
- These are needed to fix a variety of issues with the info file,
including the lintian error "info-document-missing-dir-entry".
-- Nicholas D Steeves Wed, 03 May 2017 15:52:36 -0400
Do the headers for the patches I cherry-picked (on
On 5 May 2017 at 15:27, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On 05/05/2017, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 19:50 +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
>
>>> 2. Add ZFS to a Debian Installer that is not the *default* Debian
>>> Installer. Does Debian distribute such an installer, to which the
>>> facility to compil
Package: diskscan
Version:0.18-1~bpo8+1
Hi Joao,
Diskscan-0.19-1 is in testing. I'm presently testing it on a
SAT-supported USB drive. Please backport, or let me know if you'd
like me to maintain one. I can either upload packages, or if you'd
prefer push my local jessie-backports branch of dis
Package: btrfs-progs
Version: 4.5.2-1
Tags: patch
Upstream btrfs-progs now provides a changelog. Debian Policy says we
should install it to /usr/share/doc/package-version.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas D Steeves
diff -ur btrfs-progs-4.5.2/debian/rules btrfs-progs-4.5.2.changed/debian/rules
--- btrfs
which is installed to
/usr/share/doc/btrfs-progs; it must be manually copied into place;
I've included it because this is the first place a sophisticated user
would look.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas D Steeves
diff -ur --new-file btrfs-progs-4.5.2/debian/local/btrfs-convert.hook btrfs-progs-
Package: btrfs-progs
Version: 4.5.2-1
Tags: patch
Control: severity -1 severe
Btrfs-progs is not GPL-2+. It is predominantly and explicitly GPL-2,
with some GPL-2+, some LGPL-2, and some GPL-3. GPL-2 and GPL-3 are
not compatible, so this is serious.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas D Steeves
diff -ur
V2 of this patch uses dh_installdocs, rather than install -D, to put
the contributed hook in /usr/share/doc.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas D Steeves
diff -Nur btrfs-progs-4.5.2.orig/debian/local/btrfs-convert.hook btrfs-progs-4.5.2/debian/local/btrfs-convert.hook
--- btrfs-progs-4.5.2.orig/debian
Hello!
v2 of this patch does not require the use of a dh_override; it uses
debian/btrfs-progs.changelogs instead.
Please consult https://github.com/sten0/btrfs-progs.git for an
overview of my work.
Cheers,
Nicholas
diff -urN '--exclude=.git' btrfs-progs-xnox/debian/btrfs-progs.changelogs btrfs-p
Hello!
v3 of this patch does not require the use of a dh_override; it uses
debian/btrfs-progs.examples instead.
Please consult https://github.com/sten0/btrfs-progs.git for an
overview of my work.
Cheers,
Nicholas
diff -urN btrfs-progs-xnox/debian/btrfs-progs.examples btrfs-progs-sten/debian/btrf
Strange, the wrapper script didn't make it in to v3 of the patch. Here is v4.
diff -urN btrfs-progs-xnox/debian/btrfs-progs.examples btrfs-progs-sten/debian/btrfs-progs.examples
--- btrfs-progs-xnox/debian/btrfs-progs.examples 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500
+++ btrfs-progs-sten/debian/btrfs-p
Package: debhelper
Version: 9.20160403
Dear maintainer,
Please backport debhelper to Jessie. Here are the issues I've
encountered resulting from its absence:
1) lintian bpo version depends on a newer debhelper
- lintians errors must presently be ignored
2) without a newer debhelper, one of
Correction, for item 3)
dh_elpa is not provided by debhelper, but the dh-elpa package depends
on a newer version of debhelper.
Sorry for the oversight!
Nicholas
Package: rng-tools
Version: 2-unofficial-mt.14-1
Tags: patch
With a fresh install on a Xeon 1226 v3, reading 52KiB from /dev/random
occurs at ~20bits/s
Adding haveged gets it up to the ~60bits/s range
But wow, adding the TPM's TRNG gets it as high as ~2.58MiB/s !
Removing haveged at this point dro
Hi Markus,
Just to confirm, a downgrade to linux-image-4.3.5-1 fixed this? Is it
also fixed in one of linux-image-4.5.3-1, 4.5.4-1, or 4.5.5-1 (if
you're running unstable)?
Thanks,
Nicholas
Oh, I now see what happened with swh-plugins now with '+ * Fix
multi-arch path."' (I received email to deb-multimedia mailing list
and replied without checking bug context). Sorry about that! I'll
move my OT discussion to the mailing list.
Best regards,
Nicholas
Package: xserver-xorg-input-multitouch
Version: 1.0~rc2+git20110312-2
xf86-input-multitouch v1.0-rc3 is the most recent upstream version,
from 2012-03-24
http://bitmath.org/code/multitouch/
I also found this:
https://github.com/rydberg/Multitouch-X-Driver/tree/master/debian
Cheers,
Nicholas
y, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/diskscan/diskscan_0.19-1~bpo8+1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Rebuild for jessie-backports. (Closes: #824812)
Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
l/main/b/bit-babbler/bit-babbler_0.5~bpo8+1.dsc
Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.6.22
Hi, I've been practising packaging in git, and practising
transitioning package which are not maintained in git to git repos.
One issue I've encountered is that with both gbp import-dsc, and more
worrisomely gpb import-dsc --debsnap, the import merges bpo
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.7.5
Following up on Bug#826341: I suspect a backported v0.7.6 package
would save time/work :-) If #826341 is closed as wont-fix, please
consider backporting git-buildpackage nonetheless.
Best regards,
Nicholas
Also, it would be good to document somewhere that, --hrng=driver needs
to be omitted eg:
RNGDOPTIONS="--fill-watermark=90% --feed-interval=1"
cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail hovers close to 4000 after
this is enabled on my Thinkpad. Without it, it hovers around between
the mid-to-high-2
mark=90% --feed-interval=1"
#RNGDOPTIONS="--hrng=viapadlock --fill-watermark=90% --feed-interval=1"
+#RNGDOPTIONS="--fill-watermark=90% --feed-interval=1" # <- for tpm_rng use
On 4 June 2016 at 21:06, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Also, it would be good to document somewher
control: notfound -1 linux/4.3.5-1
control: fixed -1 linux/4.5.0-2
Hi Markus,
Thank you for the confirmation! :-)
Cheers,
Nicholas
On 4 April 2016 at 09:20, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> I did a preliminary review on pkg-multimedia mail list [1] (where Nicholas
> applied for the team join)
>
>
> please address the issues I raised, and remove the moreinfo tag once done,
> and I'll do another spin.
>
>
> [1]
> https://lists
Fixed @ same URL. Lots of beginner mistakes, plus carelessness wrt to
Standards Version :-$ Whoops! Thank you for your patience.
On 5 April 2016 at 13:07, Gianfranco Costamagna
> BTW I'm not sure about the udeb package rename, there is no upgrade path
> there, maybe you can get in touch with
>
On 5 April 2016 at 13:52, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> so, please remove the moreinfo tag once you have a feedback from -boot team.
Will do. 'hope they rsvp soon!
> also a reverse-dependency needs fixing here
> https://codesearch.debian.net/results/btrfs-tools-udeb/page_0
> partman-btrfs
Fix
D Steeves
Date: Mon Jun 20 15:38:01 2016 -0400
* debian/watch: add cryptographic signature verification of tarball.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas D Steeves
diff --git a/debian/upstream/signing-key.asc b/debian/upstream/signing-key.asc
new file mode 100644
index 000..bbc871a
Hi,
Here is v2 of the patch, rebased on the btrfs-tools-3.17 package instead
of my git tree.
Cheers,
Nicholas
diff -urN btrfs-tools-3.17.orig/debian/upstream/signing-key.asc btrfs-tools-3.17/debian/upstream/signing-key.asc
--- btrfs-tools-3.17.orig/debian/upstream/signing-key.asc 1969-12-31 19
visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfs-progs
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.4.1-1.1~bpo8+1.dsc
Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
Thank you Gianfranco!
Nicholas
On 3 May 2016 at 06:20, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, signed and uploaded!
>
> cheers,
>
> G.
>
>
>
>
>
> Il Lunedì 2 Maggio 2016 23:42, Nicholas D Steeves ha
> scritto:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity:
Hi Steve,
I just wanted to follow-up, and mention that the btrfs-progs rename
and patched partman-btrfs are in the archive and have migrated to
testing.
Best regards,
Nicholas
Hi Yaroslav,
Is this bug for linux-image or btrfs-tools? Kernels based on
linux-4.4.6 and linux-4.5.1 are available, and I've updated
btrfs-progs to v4.4.1. I'm planning to upload v4.5.2 soon, for
completeness, but it will be to experimental, because I've read a
couple of reports of problems tha
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfs-progs". I've read
upstream reports of regressions in the 4.5.x series that were solved
by downgrading to 4.4.x, so I believe that it is most appropriate to
upload to experimental at this
Hi Gianfranco
On 6 May 2016 at 04:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> Hi, it would be nice to avoid having a possible and problematic version even
> in experimental.
> Specially because it might be source of data-losses to the end users.
>
I agree, however, upstream's official recommendation is
Package: btrfs-progs
Version: 4.4.1-1.1
Severity: serious
To conclude the btrfs-tools to btrfs-progs rename, ftpmasters need to
be contacted to remove btrfs-tools-udev from the archive for unstable
and testing. When I discussed the rename with the D-I team, they said
a btrfs-tools-udev dummy pack
On 9 May 2016 at 04:31, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Waiting for his reply.
>
>
> this seems the most important bit, I would appreciate you opening a bug
> report against
> the package (severity:important), explaining why you want a version in
> experimental,
> leaving xnox the time to answer
On 9 May 2016 at 13:18, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848
>>"as an RC bug on the package".
>
> I have reassigned it to ftpmasters, I don't think there is need to wait for
> the maintainer opinion, this is a binary without source.
T
Hi Chris,
I'm not sure when it will be ready, but it looks like Qu Wenruo is
working on this upstream:
[PATCH RFC 00/16] Introduce low memory usage btrfsck mode
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg54480.html
Cheers,
Nicholas
On 11 May 2016 at 09:09, Philip Hands wrote:
> Philipp Kern writes:
>
> Do modern screens still actaully suffer from burn-in?
>
To my knowledge only screens with a phosphorus layer do, and the only
modern (and recently no longer manufactured) ones are plasma TVs...and
those eventually suffer los
On 11 May 2016 at 20:51, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 23:16 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> I also like the dimming idea. It sounds to me like there could be some
>> filter be applied to the output of X...
>
> xrandr --brightness
>
> But it is implemented in individual drivers by set
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.6.22
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer,
I've investigated a possible jessie-backport of
git-buildpackage-0.7.5, but I'm not sure if backporting stretch's
bash-completion is allowed or desired. I looked into this because I'd
really appreciate having the --mer
The reason I ask is at the time of linux-3.12, there were a number of
bugs caused by the interaction of btrfs and the RT patches. Some of
them were btrfs, some of them the RT patches fault, and from what I've
read it's better now, but there are still probably issues.
Cheers,
Nicholas
Hi,
For another data point, I've attached the output to the following:
lsb_release -a > graphics-stack.txt && echo >> graphics-stack.txt &&
dpkg -l linux-image-4.4.14.20160627 *drm* xserver-xorg-video-intel
*mesa* libva* i965-va-driver | sed '//d' >> graphics-stack.txt
As Sebastian notes, I also
Hi Osamu,
Is this bug still present in linux-image-4.6.0-1-rt-amd64=4.6.2-2?
Cheers,
Nicholas
Hi Henrique,
I am interested in comaintaining the rng-tools; however, I do not
believe I have sufficient proficiency in C to be the sole maintainer.
If I had any hard to answer cryptography questions I would ask Ron,
the maintainer of bit-babbler, who I've been collaborating with and
learning from
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for this update of "btrfs-progs". I have
chosen to update to v4.5.3, because this version does not trigger a
bug when combined with linux-4.6.x as discussed in the following
email:
https://www.spinics.net/lis
Package: network-manager-openvpn
Version: 0.9.10.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
I've been putting of reporting that nm-openvpn in Jessie fails to tear
down the tap0 interface when disconnecting from a VPN...well, it's
just as well that I put it off, because it turns out that it is a more
severe issue th
Package: intel-microcode
Version: 3.20151106.1~deb8u1
When booting, the error:
modprobe: "module microcode not found in modules.dep"
is printed to the screen. If plymouth splash is being used, the
splash screen is dropped to display this error.
I believe that this behaviour began in linux
Control: found -1 intel-microcode/3.20151106.1
Control: fixed -1 intel-microcode/3.20160607.1
On 2 July 2016 at 19:09, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> This is bug #814301, already fixed in unstable.
Sorry for missing that!
> A package with this fix won't be uploaded to stable-backports unt
s -u
fi
diff -ur ./debian/changelog ../btrfs-progs-4.4.1-static_path/debian/changelog
--- ./debian/changelog 2016-04-20 19:18:09.337997103 -0400
+++ ../btrfs-progs-4.4.1-static_path/debian/changelog 2016-04-20
19:22:16.621669102 -0400
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
* Update standards versi
On 21 April 2016 at 08:33, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> On 04/21/2016 09:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> activate update-initramfs
>> do you think it is worth adding to the current NMU or it is better to leave
>> it for
>> a future upload?
>
> I'm not sure if you meant to
On 21 April 2016 at 03:53, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Policy §10.4 says that /bin/sh script need to follow SUSv3 + some
> extensions. Both "hash" and "command -v" are optional in SUSv3 (but they are
> mandatory in SUSv4), so in theory you shouldn't use them. In practice,
> however, "command -v" is probab
Hi Dimitri,
On 22 April 2016 at 19:20, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I haven't looked closely, but i have a lot dubious emails about btrfs package.
> (a) i do not maintain backports, anybody is free to do those
> (b) all of my packages are lowNMU, meaning I trust any/all DDs to do
> sensible thing
Hi Gianfranco,
Here is a link to the latest version, which uses triggers instead of
postinst and postrm. I think it's ready to upload, but please double
check :-)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.4.1-1.1.dsc
Cheers,
Nicholas
On 9 April 2016 at 03:04, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Nicholas D Steeves (nstee...@gmail.com):
>> Package: partman-btrfs
>> Version: 20
>>
>> I am working on problems associated with bug #780081, where it was
>> planned to have a fix staged in experime
Hi Julian,
On 12 April 2016 at 11:30, Julian Taylor wrote:
>
> btrfs-tools does not need to have the same version as the kernel, you
> can use any newer version of it with older kernels.
> See this faq and the one following:
>
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#What_version_of_btrfs-pr
Hi Ritesh,
On 16 April 2016 at 04:46, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 21:14 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>
>> As of btrfs-progs-4.4, they're "doing preparatory work for
>> btrfs-convert rewrite" (
>> https://btrfs.wiki.kerne
Hi Christian,
On 23 April 2016 at 23:05, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> On 9 April 2016 at 03:04, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Changes seem to be OK, but I guess that we can't upload before the
>> btrfs-tools package hasn't been renamed, isn't it?
>>
>> Fro
Hi Julius,
Have you had a chance to see if this was fixed in
btrfs-tools-3.17-1.1~bpo70+1? The new command is: btrfs check
/dev/vdb1
Regards,
Nicholas
ems filled with data you value.
Proceed (Yes/No)?
--
This way the binary is still shipped, but it's unquestionably clear
that this is a dangerous thing to do. Also can/should the wrapper
script go into the initramfs?
Sincerely,
Nicholas
On 25 April 2016 at 07:51, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
Julius,
Thank you for sharing your observations when closing this bug. Your
attention to detail for the record is appreciated. Please don't
hesitate to report any issues you encounter in the future, because
case-by-case tests like these go a long way towards helping to find
and fix corner-cases.
1 - 100 of 1831 matches
Mail list logo
