On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 20:19 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
tags 308878 moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Svante Signell wrote:
Package: kernel-image
Version: 2.6.10-1-686-smp and 2.6.11-1-686-smp
...
please send in working dmesg of 2.6.8 or 2.6.9.
Attached.
are you using scsi
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 12:10 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 20:19 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
tags 308878 moreinfo
thanks
Installing the updated initrd-tools (0.1.79) gives no error in cpio
with /lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found:
# apt-get install --reinstall kernel-image
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 11:58 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
Subject: xserver-xorg: No direct rendering with recent kernels
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Recent kernels 2.6.14-2-686-smp and 2.6.15-rc4-686-smp
of xorg.conf:
Option OldDmaInit true
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 00:45 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 11:58 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
Subject: xserver-xorg: No direct rendering with recent kernels
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
*** Please type
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 16:16 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 10:42 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
Can you please add the workaround described below to the DRM problems
with kernels 2.6.14+15 to next release of Xorg. Obviously the kernel
module patch will not be included until
Package: liboil0.3
Version: 0.3.6-1
Severity: normal
dpkg-reconfigure gstreamer0.8-misc
OIL: ERROR liboiltest.c 325: oil_test_check_impl(): illegal instruction
in fbCompositeSolid_nxmmx
OIL: ERROR liboiltest.c 325: oil_test_check_impl(): illegal instruction
in fbCompositeSolid_nxmmx
cat
Subject: xserver-xorg: No direct rendering with recent kernels
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Recent kernels 2.6.14-2-686-smp and 2.6.15-rc4-686-smp does not have
direct rendering enabled. Kernel 2.6.11-1-686-smp
Can you forward this bug to the DRI developers. I have tried 1.2.2 and
the latest CVS with same bad results. I also tried 1.2.0 from CVS which
froze the computer completely with DRI enabled. The latest working
version was 1.1.1 something and xorg 7.0!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
in ?? ()
#7 0x08055280 in ?? ()
#8 0x in ?? ()
dpkg -S /usr/lib/dri/tdfx_dri.so
libgl1-mesa-dri: /usr/lib/dri/tdfx_dri.so
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 23:40 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
Can you forward this bug to the DRI developers. I have tried 1.2.2 and
the latest CVS with same bad results. I
know.
Best regards,
Svante Signell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1.4.2.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Hardware: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP
glxinfo reports direct rendering supported. Starting glxgears freezes
the computer. Remote login and reboot work, not killing any processes.
Numerous outputs like this in the
On Friday 27 October 2006 23:22, Drew Parsons wrote:
glxinfo reports direct rendering supported. Starting glxgears freezes
the computer.
mga 1.4.4 was released today with the description Fix initialization
issues that led to DRI lock-ups on some G400 configurations.
I guess it should therefore
Have you tried the new driver xserver-xorg-video-mga-1.4.4? I made
a .deb of this driver, see attached file in bug 395025. In case it works
we should convince the Debian X Strike Force to upgrade the 1.4.2 driver
to 1.4.4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: libpam-modules
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: normal
The following los are created when uncloking xscreensaver in unstable
and gnome-screensaver in testing (on another box):
Aug 26 08:11:28 em2 unix_chkpwd[20714]: password check failed for user (me)
This problem is related to the resolved
Severity 479533 grave
Notforwarded 479533
Some more info: Cc: field is filled in when creating a new mail.
However, when replying (Reply, Reply to all) it is not! Is this intended
behaviour? This is in contrast with earlier versions of evolution!
This behaviour is present in at least 2.2.23.1-1
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't reproduce on unstable/amd64 (2,22,3,1-1 and eds 2.22.3-1).
Replying correctly sets the BCC: field I configured. If I do that from
another account, then change the From: Identity, the BCC: field is added
as well.
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
:47:08 em2 gnome-keyring-daemon[3838]: Credentials byte was not
nul
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 23:15 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
I'm seeing this for some time now, ever since before Nov 30 last year.
Jan 28 10:05:07 em2 gnome-keyring-daemon[5040]: Credentials byte was not
nul
Upstream is asking
OK, I give up. In my opinion, then there are logic errors in some of the
the kernel modules :-( I assume that they are creating the /sys entries.
They should be changed, as well as the sensors.conf file, but who cares!
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 01:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Svante Signell
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:07 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Svante Signell a écrit :
OK, I give up. In my opinion, then there are logic errors in some of the
the kernel modules :-( I assume that they are creating the /sys entries.
They should be changed, as well as the sensors.conf file
-video-ati 1:6.7.196-1 X.Org X server-ATI
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 23:12 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
Svante Signell wrote:
Severity: Important
Problem remains also with xorg 7.3!
xorg 1:7.3+2
xserver-xorg 1:7.3+2
xserver-xorg
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 1:3.0.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Some voltage readings are not reported by versions 3 of lm-sensors.
Configuration files tried with versions 3 are both the
old /etc/sensors.conf and the new /etc/sensors3.conf, same result, see
below.
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 22:22 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
severity 456774 normal
thanks
Svante Signell a écrit :
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 1:3.0.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Some voltage readings are not reported by versions 3 of lm-sensors
) + @, (@ + in0 * 36/16.2) / (1 +
36/16.2)
+
set in0_min 5 * 0.95
set in0_max 5 * 1.05
# What is your VTT? It is probably not this value...
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 22:41 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 22:22 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
severity 456774 normal
thanks
,
Svante Signell
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 10:29 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
severity 456774 important
tag 456774 - patch
thanks
Svante Signell a écrit :
Severity: serious
Tags: Patch
After looking at the calculations made in sensors3.conf causing the
problems I found
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 3.0.0
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The following sensors calculate wrong max and min values for negative
inputs in sensors3.conf:
chip lm78-* lm79-* w83781d-*
chip as99127f-*
chip lm87-* adm1024-*
The max and min values should be swapped as shown for lm78 below:
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 11:54 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
severity 457545 normal
thanks
Svante Signell a écrit :
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 3.0.0
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Next time, please read http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
before reporting a bug.
Sorry
I'm seeing this for some time now, ever since before Nov 30 last year.
Jan 28 10:05:07 em2 gnome-keyring-daemon[5040]: Credentials byte was not
nul
Upstream is asking whether this is still happening after logging out
and in again. You can follow the discussion at the following URL:
'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'.
done.
Setting default volumes...
--
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'.
done.
Setting default volumes...
--
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: Important
Problem remains also with xorg 7.3!
xorg 1:7.3+2
xserver-xorg 1:7.3+2
xserver-xorg-core2:1.4-2
Watching videos shows black dotted contours in the image. Screenshots
taken with mplayer does not show
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.6.c-3+b1
Severity: Important
Graphics card: Mach64 3D Rage LT Pro AGP-133
xorg 1:7.3+2
xserver-xorg 1:7.3+2
xserver-xorg-core2:1.4-2
libglib2.0-0 2.14.1-3
vlc and glib
Severity: Serious
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 07:33 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers
Package: libnm-glib0
Version: 0.6.5-2
Severity: grave
Tags: unstable
With the latest libnm-glib installed and starting evolution my X windows
log file is filled with entries shown below exhausting the hard disk
space:
(evolution:23673): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_origin: assertion
Sorry for the noise, the problem is solely in evolution itself. Close
please, I will file a bug towards evolution instead.
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libnm-glib0 [0.6.5-2] does not play well
Package: evolution
Version: 2.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: unstable
With the latest evolution my X windows log file is filled with entries
shown below exhausting the hard disk space:
(evolution:23673): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_origin: assertion
`GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed
fff
Package: libattr1
Version: 2.4.35-1
Severity: Serious
Tags: sid
Long directory listings does not work any longer:
ls: OK
ls -l:
ls: relocation error: /lib/libacl.so.1: symbol getxattr, version
ATTR_1.0 not defined in file libattr.so.1 with link time reference
Reverting to
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Boot hangs with:
...
Starting balanced_irq
Using IPI No-Shortcut mode
ACPI (supports S0 S4 S5)
Time: tsc clocksource has been installed
Freeing unused kernel memory: 196k freed
Subject title should read: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot!
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot!
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:26:26 +0100
Package: linux
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:30 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:10:50PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:37 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
I have already listed the visible screen
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 13:57 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:09:38PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
I have also run lilo manually several times, e.g lilo -v shows:
...
# Specifies the boot device. This is where Lilo installs its boot
# block. It can be either
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:58 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:52:53PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
# dpkg -S /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird
yaird: /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird
oh please use mkinitramfs, install initramfs-tools,
the postinst will pick it up automaticaly
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 20:17 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:58 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:52:53PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
# dpkg -S /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird
yaird: /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird
oh please use mkinitramfs, install
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 20:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:26:40PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
..
Ok. First, would it be possible for you to reproduce /all/ the kernel
output prior to this boot failure (or at least, all that's visible on the
screen at the point
this
problem.
--
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: Serious
--
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:44 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
severity 412799 normal
tags 412799 moreinfo, unreproducible
stop
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:01:49AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
Severity: Serious
--
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
boots fine here across many boxes.
how
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:37 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
I have already listed the visible screen output until the hang. Is there
any way to get more information? I thought syslog does not log properly
and at next reboot you
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 00:36 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
After communicating with the people at dri-devel a patch is available
that solves the locking problem with this driver, see the now resolved
bug 9032 at bugs.freedesktop.org. Please release .deb files for the
updated driver when
Dear X strike force,
Version 1.3.0 of the tdfx driver is now released fixing the locking bug
of 1.2.1 and the Xorg 7.1 server. Please release a new debian package
for this driver, available at:
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/driver/xf86-video-tdfx-1.3.0.tar.bz2
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:19 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
retitle 425803
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 03:23 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
...
After this I successfullly reinstalled jadetex (3.13-8) and
docbook-utils (0.6.14-1), but removing them in the first place does not
seem necessary, since version 3.13-8
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 07:59 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that, together with removing jadetex, solved your problems, although
the message from color.sty (No driver specified), correct?
I first made the installs mentioned above on another box
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 09:17 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now upgraded to tetex-base-bin 2007-9 and tetex-base 2007-7 after
restoring the conffiles. I assume the other packages will install properly
too, will do that now. What puzzles me
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 02:22 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Hi Svante,
Is there anything new about XV being broken on your mach64 board? Did
you by chance look at Michel's earlier questions? (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=35;bug=425814)
It looks like we'll have to
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 3.3-pre11-3,3.3-pre11-2
Severity: grave
It seems that upgrading of packeages in unstable is hindered by this bug
so the importance should be raised to grave! A temporary workaround is
to install module-init-tools-3.3-pre11-1 from testing after the failure
to
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:24 -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:14:21AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
so the importance should be raised to grave! A temporary workaround is
to install module-init-tools-3.3-pre11-1 from testing after the failure
to install module-init
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.7~alpha2
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
The new release of ifupdown does not work! I had to revert to 0.6.8 to
get ethernet working again (after buyng a new card to replace the old
one, which works perfectly).
Everything is OK from kernel, detecting the network
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Setting up texlive-base-bin (2007-8) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Building format(s) --all . This may take some time...
fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.6.3-2
Severity: normal
Since some time the Xv extension does not work properly on the Mach64.
Video sequences show blinking black patterns on contours in the images.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers stable
APT policy:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:44 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
On 5/24/07, Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.6.3-2
Severity: normal
Since some time the Xv extension does not work properly
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 20:54 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:44 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
On 5/24/07, Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.6.3-2
Severity: normal
Since
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
retitle 425803 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390)
retitle 425781 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390)
thanks
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
! I can't find file
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
retitle 425803 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug
#420390)
retitle 425781 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug
#420390)
thanks
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:19 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
retitle 425803 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug
#420390)
retitle 425781 upgrade fails due
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 08:44 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:15 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 20:54 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:44 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
...
I have now downgraded the following packages:
apt-get
Package: gnuplot
Version: 4.0.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: unstable
gnuplot 4.2.0 is released since some time. It would be nice to be able
to install it in unstable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg
Vsrsion: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: Serious
The console screen gets completely garbled when starting X.org.
Going back to the console C-A-{F1-F6} or exiting X gives the same
result. X works fine, also with C-A-Fx to C-A-F7. The font seems to be
black with a black background.
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 11:48 +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
El Jueves, 14 de Julio de 2005 10:54, Svante Signell escribió:
Package: xserver-xorg
Vsrsion: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: Serious
The console screen gets completely garbled when starting X.org.
Going back to the console C
Reassign 479533 evolution 2.22.3.1-1
Severity: 479533 important
Submitter: 479533 !
Retitle: 479533 Cc: field in not filled in when replying or forwarding a
message!
Time to fix this bug before Lenny is released. This bug is flagged as
fixed upstream, but is still persent in 2.22.3.1! Previous
Reassign 479533 evolution 2.22.3.1-1
Severity 479533 important
Submitter 479533 !
Retitle 479533 Cc: field in not filled in when replying or forwarding a message!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Same problem as the reporter on one box, not on another.
Both boxes: (same file)
ls -l /usr/lib/octave/3.0.1/oct/*/cellfun.oct
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88804 Apr 22
23:58 /usr/lib/octave/3.0.1/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu/cellfun.oct
Startup files:
ls -l /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/m/startup/octaverc
On both boxes with/without the problem /usr/lib/liboctave.so
or /usr/lib/libcruft.so does not exist.
They are not found in liboctinterp.so or liboctinterp.so.3.0.1 either:
/usr/lib/octave-3.0.1/liboctinterp.so:
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
liboctave.so = not found
notfixed 479533 2.22.1.1-2
reopen 479533 2.22.1.1-2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some more info: Cc: field is filled in when creating a new mail.
However, when replying (Reply, Reply to all) it is not! Is this intended
behaviour? This is in contrast with earlier versions of evolution!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
retitle 488762 uses 1600x1024 instead of 1600x1200
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:09 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
severity 488762 important
retitle 488762 uses 1660x1024 instead of 1600x1200
thank you
Svante Signell wrote:
After upgrading the mga driver X-windows comes up in a resolution
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 12:24 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Svante Signell wrote:
retitle 488762 uses 1600x1024 instead of 1600x1200
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:09 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
severity 488762 important
retitle 488762 uses 1660x1024 instead of 1600x1200
thank you
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 12:50 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Svante Signell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 12:24 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
--- xorg.conf 2008-07-01 11:49:17.0 +0200
+++ xorg.conf_xserver-xorg-video-mga2008-07-01 01:28:13.0
+0200
@@ -34,7
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:55 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Svante Signell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 12:50 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Svante Signell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 12:24 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
--- xorg.conf 2008-07-01 11:49:17.0 +0200
At least not for Cc: in 2.22.1.1-1. It seems to work for Bcc: though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.10
Severity: important
Currently installed:
ii xserver-xorg 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 the X.Org X server
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dist-upgrading
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.02
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Font paths are wrong in the dexconf script, see attached path:
--- ./dexconf 2006-03-10 09:12:09.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/dexconf2006-03-08 03:42:10.0 +0100
@@ -202,13 +202,13 @@
exec 4$DEXCONFTMPDIR/Files
/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType
EndSection
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 09:16 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.02
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Font paths are wrong in the dexconf script, see attached path:
--- ./dexconf 2006-03-10 09:12:09.0
Dear all,
this bug has not been resolved. Of course experimental and unstable
versions could and _should_ coexist!!! See previous reports...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-1
Severity: normal
For kernels 2.6.15 and below the following option is needed
to /etc/X11/xorg.conf in order to enable direct rendering for AGP cards:
Option OldDmaInit True
For kernels 2.6.16 and later this is not needed.
It it
This bug is related to bug 356181, which is already solved. You can
close this bug too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: 0.6.43.3
Replaces: libapt-pkg-doc ( 0.3.7), libapt-pkg-dev ( 0.3.7)
Provides: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.5-1), libgcc1 (= 1:4.0.2), libstdc++6 (=
4.0.2-4)
--
Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1.6.4-1
reopen 548716
Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390?
If you're asking this question, you shouldn't be using debian unstable.
Sorry for raising
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 01:08 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390?
If you're asking this question, you
Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2009-10
Severity: normal
The exercise package in texlive-latex-extra version 2009-10 contains
version 1.3 of exercise.sty and the corrsponding documentetion
exercise.pdf. Since 1.3 several bugs have been corrected, the one that
hit me, refering to a
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 02:17 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Package: emacs23
Version: 23.2+1-7
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hello,
Svante Signell, le Wed 19 Jan 2011 14:10:09 +0100, a écrit :
After installing emacs23 when trying
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 17:41 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Fri 21 Jan 2011 17:30:38 +0100, a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 02:17 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Wed 19 Jan 2011 14:10:09 +0100, a écrit :
After installing emacs23 when trying to start it I
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 11:11 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Tue 25 Jan 2011 05:47:27 +0100, a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 05:41:10PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Fri 21 Jan 2011 17:30:38 +0100, a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 02:17 +0100
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 15:50 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle martedì 25 gennaio 2011, Svante Signell ha scritto:
Starting emacs from gdb did not give much:
(I assume I have to debug-compile emacs (and xserver, and glibc and
Hurd)?)
Installing libc0.3-dbg should be enough, I think.
Also
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 18:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Tue 25 Jan 2011 15:46:59 +0100, a écrit :
(I assume I have to debug-compile emacs (and xserver, and glibc and
Hurd)?)
There are packages for these: libc0.3-dbg, hurd-dbg, libx11-6-dbg.
Attached is the full
Subject: sudo-source: configure stamp bug in debian/rules
Package: sudo
Version: 1.7.4p4-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
This bug is also present in Version 1.7.4p4-6.
When building from source the configuration stamp created is named
config-stamp, not configure-stamp, causing a complete
Subject: sudo-source: Does not build from source
Package: sudo
Version: 1.7.4p4-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
This bug is also present in Version 1.7.4p4-6.
When building from source on GNU/Hurd the macro HAVE_GETUTID is defined
but not on GNU/Linux, making the Hurd build fail. The problem
Another typo:
In the clean target, change
rm -f config-stamp build-stamp
to
rm -f configure-stamp build-stamp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: x86info
Version: 1.25-1
Severity: normal
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell s...@kth.se
Reply-to: s...@kth.se
To: bug-hurd bug-h...@gnu.org
Cc: debian-hurd debian-h...@lists.debian.org, Debian Bug Tracking
System sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Success in building
severity 527589 important
Package: libc0.3-dev
Tags: patch
Version: 2.11.2-10
Looks like the GNU/Hurd header file /usr/include/bits/sched.h is
outdated compared to the GNU/Linux version. Attached is a diff between
the two files. The missing definitions of __CPU_ZERO_S and __CPU_SET_S
is affecting
1 - 100 of 1122 matches
Mail list logo
