Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 21/11/2018 à 22:57, Xavier a écrit : > Le 21/11/2018 à 22:51, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>>> Unable to reproduce now, this bug seems fixed now. I'm going to provide >>>> a new .deb after adding other requests

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 21/11/2018 à 23:00, Xavier a écrit : > Le 21/11/2018 à 22:57, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 21/11/2018 à 22:51, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>>>> Unable to reproduce now, this bug seems fixed now. I'm going to provide >&g

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 21/11/2018 à 23:04, Xavier a écrit : > > Le 21/11/2018 à 23:00, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 21/11/2018 à 22:57, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 21/11/2018 à 22:51, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>>>>> Unable to re

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 21/11/2018 à 23:08, Xavier a écrit : > Le 21/11/2018 à 23:04, Xavier a écrit : >> >> Le 21/11/2018 à 23:00, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 21/11/2018 à 22:57, Xavier a écrit : >>>> Le 21/11/2018 à 22:51, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 21/11/2018 à 23:04, Xavier a écrit : > > Le 21/11/2018 à 23:00, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 21/11/2018 à 22:57, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 21/11/2018 à 22:51, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>>>>> Unable to re

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 22/11/2018 à 08:46, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > Hi, > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >> Sorry, I found a SALSA_TEAM in your conf file. For clarity, SALSA_TEAM >> has been replaced by SALSA_GROUP (same for all team commands/options >> replaced by *group*). &g

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 22/11/2018 à 10:19, Xavier a écrit : > Le 22/11/2018 à 08:46, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>> Sorry, I found a SALSA_TEAM in your conf file. For clarity, SALSA_TEAM >>> has been replaced by SALSA_GR

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 22/11/2018 à 21:06, Xavier a écrit : > Le 22/11/2018 à 10:19, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 22/11/2018 à 08:46, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>>> Sorry, I found a SALSA_TEAM in your conf file. For clarity,

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 22/11/2018 à 22:45, Xavier a écrit : > Le 22/11/2018 à 21:06, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 22/11/2018 à 10:19, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 22/11/2018 à 08:46, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>&g

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 25/11/2018 à 22:37, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>> Last .deb contains the SALSA_RENAME_HEAD. Could you test it ? >> >> I wanted to do some test but something else broke: >>

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 25/11/2018 à 22:39, Xavier a écrit : > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>> Last .deb contains the SALSA_RENAME_HEAD. Could you test it ? >> >> I wanted to do some test but something else broke: >>

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 25/11/2018 à 23:25, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >> My last change produces this bug. Fixed now, I pushed a new .deb in the >> same place. > > Next try with a package whose HEAD points to the wrong branch (upstream) > but that alread

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 26/11/2018 à 07:04, Xavier a écrit : > Le 25/11/2018 à 23:25, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>> My last change produces this bug. Fixed now, I pushed a new .deb in the >>> same place. >> >> Next try with a package whose HE

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 27/11/2018 à 14:23, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > Hi, > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >> Done: I added a "rename_branch" command: >> - rename_head: >>* tries to create new branch and ignores failures >>* move default_branch to new value

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 27/11/2018 à 15:13, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >> It seems that $_ is modified sometimes somewhere else. I fixed that in >> last upload (.deb updated also) > > Now it works fine. At least, I used it to ensure consistency across all >

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 28/10/2018 à 09:47, Xavier a écrit : > Le 28/10/2018 à 08:43, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 27/10/2018 à 14:24, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 25/10/2018 à 11:33, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>>> On Fri, 19 Oc

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 29/10/2018 à 12:27, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Xavier wrote: >> Mattia explained me dep14. I found a way to do it: create branch from >> master, update project to set default_branch to debian/master then >> remove master. It works as expected. >

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 29/10/2018 à 21:35, Xavier a écrit : > Le 29/10/2018 à 12:27, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Xavier wrote: >>> Mattia explained me dep14. I found a way to do it: create branch from >>> master, update project to set default_branch to debian/master

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 29/10/2018 à 21:50, Xavier a écrit : > Le 29/10/2018 à 21:35, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 29/10/2018 à 12:27, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Xavier wrote: >>>> Mattia explained me dep14. I found a way to do it: create branch from >>>> ma

Bug#899073: RFC: javascript bundle of small packages

Le 30/10/2018 à 11:14, Xavier a écrit : > Le 30/10/2018 à 10:51, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> I have just pushed a new version of acorn and associated small package >> to salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/acorn) >> >> It group smal

Bug#912403: uscan: Regression for git mode

Le 31/10/2018 à 08:40, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.18.7 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > you should be able to reproduce the issue via > > $ apt-get source libsmithwaterman > $ cd libsmithwaterman-0.0+git20160702.2610e25 > $ uscan --verbose --force-download > .

Bug#910065: stretch-pu: package libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl/1.542-1

Le 31/10/2018 à 13:57, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > On 2018-10-08 06:18, Xavier wrote: >> Le 06/10/2018 à 18:43, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : >>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo >>> >>> On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 11:10 +0200, Xavier Guimard wrote: >>>> libmai

Bug#910065: stretch-pu: package libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl/1.542-1

Le 01/11/2018 à 21:39, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 14:24 +0100, Xavier wrote: >> Le 31/10/2018 à 13:57, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : >>> On 2018-10-08 06:18, Xavier wrote: >>>> Le 06/10/2

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 06/11/2018 à 12:13, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > Hi, > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Xavier wrote: >> I also added an "update_safe" command that starts "check_repo", then >> reports and asks before launching "update_repo" (unless --yes). I think &g

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 06/11/2018 à 12:11, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Xavier wrote: >> I also added an "update_safe" command that starts "check_repo", then >> reports and asks before launching "update_repo" (unless --yes). I think >> that&#

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le 06/11/2018 à 14:04, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Tue, 06 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>> While reading the discussion on -devel, it also occured to me that we >>> might want to be able to enable/disable the possibility to file issues >>> and open merge request. >&

Bug#890594: salsa script ready to review

Le Mercredi, Novembre 07, 2018 00:04 CET, Xavier a écrit:Le 06/11/2018 à 14:04, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :> On Tue, 06 Nov 2018, Xavier wrote: >>> While reading the discussion on -devel, it also occured to me that we >>> might want to be able to enable/disable the possi

Bug#774415: srebuild in devscripts

Le 10/11/2018 à 22:55, Xavier a écrit : > Hello, > > I started to adapt srebuild.pl for devscripts: > https://salsa.debian.org/yadd/devscripts/blob/devscripts-srebuild/scripts/srebuild.pl > > No big changes, just this: > - manpage in POD > - srebuild-hook embedded >

Bug#774415: srebuild in devscripts

uot; field which seems to not exist anymore on https://buildinfo.debian.net files. Could you take a look ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#871806: #871806: check git tag signatures

Hello Daniel, I just implement a git-tag-signature-verify feature [1] to fix #827065: just to add "pgpmode=gittag" in opts. I think it fixes this issue too. If you agree, I'll merge it. Regards, Xavier signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#907775: #907775 workaround

Hello, setting "gitmode=full" will fix your problem for now. I don't understand why "git clone --bare" gets tags with some github repositories and not for some others... Searching... Cheers, Xavier signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#902981: #902981 : upstream fork

Hi all, In case you didn't see it, their is a fork of font-awesome here: https://forkawesome.github.io/Fork-Awesome/ It could perhaps solve DFSG potential problem ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#894074: uscan is failing to repack gitlab from last 2 versions

Le 26/09/2018 à 18:26, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > I got the same issue with some big eclipse packages. I worked around it > by watching and repacking the .zip archive instead of the .tar.gz Hello, I think this bug is similar to #831870 (tar bug probably). Could we merge them ?

Bug#902981: fork-awesome

solution is to use "non-free" branch. This is not part of Debian release but is distributed in parallel. Note also that in this case, every package which depend on version 5 will be forced out of Debian release to fall back to "contrib" branch. Cheers, Xavier

Bug#909480: Feersum FTBFS

After some tests on Santiago VM, it looks like feersum build well in stretch but fails randomly (>90%) with testing/unstable I'll take a look at Plack::App::Cascade and EV changes.

Bug#909480: Feersum FTBFS

Le 29/09/2018 à 14:56, Xavier a écrit : > After some tests on Santiago VM, it looks like feersum build well in > stretch but fails randomly (>90%) with testing/unstable > > I'll take a look at Plack::App::Cascade and EV changes. Bug is around HTTP::Request, either it doesn&

Bug#909480: Feersum FTBFS

Le 29/09/2018 à 16:41, Xavier a écrit : > Le 29/09/2018 à 14:56, Xavier a écrit : >> After some tests on Santiago VM, it looks like feersum build well in >> stretch but fails randomly (>90%) with testing/unstable >> >> I'll take a look at Plack::App::Cascade and

Bug#909480: Feersum FTBFS

Le 29/09/2018 à 17:59, Santiago Vila a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:40:54PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > >> The error is 'Connection reset by peer', so LWP can't follow >> redirection. Is there a special network configuration in your VMs ? > > Well, t

Bug#909480: Bug #909480 in feersum marked as pending

Le 29/09/2018 à 19:13, Santiago Vila a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:00:42PM +0000, Xavier Guimard wrote: > >> >> Disable 2 tests if only one CPU is available >> >> Closes: #909480) >

Bug#909480: Feersum FTBFS

Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 + patch Control: reassign -1 perl-modules-5.26 Sometimes, a closed connection isn't detected by HTTP::Tiny. To reproduce the bug, use feersum sources: $ perl Makefile.PL && make $ taskset -c 0 perl -I blib/lib -I blib/arch t/63* HTTP::Tiny tries to re

Bug#909480: Feersum FTBFS

Le 30/09/2018 à 09:12, Xavier a écrit : > Control: severity -1 normal > Control: tags -1 + patch > Control: reassign -1 perl-modules-5.26 > > Sometimes, a closed connection isn't detected by HTTP::Tiny. To > reproduce the bug, use feersum sources: > > $ perl Makefil

Bug#909480: HTTP::Tiny tries to reuse closed connections

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/chansen/p5-http-tiny/pull/117 Le 01/10/2018 à 21:21, Niko Tyni a écrit : > ... > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Xavier wrote: >> Sometimes, a closed connection isn't detected by HTTP::Tiny. To >> reproduce the b

Bug#910262: devscripts: autopkgtest regression

Le 04/10/2018 à 12:56, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 09:23:56AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. Apart from the >> error that causes the failure, I was wondering if due to bug 909719, a >> *versioned* *test* dependency on dp

Bug#910065: stretch-pu: package libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl/1.542-1

Le 06/10/2018 à 18:43, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 11:10 +0200, Xavier Guimard wrote: >> libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl contains some viruses in its >> tests files (#864800). This update proposes to clean sources

Bug#896136: Seems fixed now

Hello, I can't reproduce your bug with last uscan (2.18.6). Could you verify that this bug is fixed ?

Bug#896136: Seems fixed now

Le 10/10/2018 à 06:36, Xavier a écrit : > Hello, > > I can't reproduce your bug with last uscan (2.18.6). Could you verify > that this bug is fixed ? No sorry, bug found

Bug#910709: devscripts: uscan fails to create git archive in mode=git

Le 10/10/2018 à 04:57, Kunal Mehta a écrit : > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.18.6 > Severity: important > > uscan fails to create git archives when using mode=git in debian/watch. > > The specific watch file is >

Bug#910709: 910709: workaround

A workaround can be to use "gitmode=full" for now.

Bug#906279: [uscan]: add support for selveral different url to look for tarballs

Hello, did you try to use 2 lines in debian/watch ? It may work as you want version=4 opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/ https://download.kde.org/stable/applications/([\d.]+)/src/@PACKAGE@-([\d.]+)\.tar\.xz opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/ https://download.kde.org/unstable/applications/([\d.]+)/src/@

Bug#909537: [devscripts] Files-Excluded-module-hyphen does not work

mk-origtargz uses Dpkg::Control::HashCore to read debian/copyright. Manpage says: "The fields names are case insensitive and are always capitalized" according to RFC822. That is the problem...

Bug#908521: Proposed CGI

Merge request created here: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/merge_requests/9

Bug#908521: Proposed CGI

Le 10/09/2018 à 20:46, Xavier a écrit : > Merge request created here: > > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/merge_requests/9 Updated: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/merge_requests/10

Bug#905254: Packaging libphp-phpmailer 6

Hi Kevin, could you tell me if you planed to release libphp-phpmailer version >=6? I need it to fix some CVE in buster. Cheers, Xavier signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#898102: More information

kernel 4.14.17-1. Cheers, Xavier $ lspci ... 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation MCP89 [GeForce 320M] (rev a2)

Bug#907737: liblucy-perl: Project Lucy has retired

Le 10/09/2018 à 00:54, Dominic Hargreaves a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 04:42:36PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> Quoting Xavier Guimard (2018-09-01 08:46:22) >>>> Package: liblucy-perl

Bug#908824: libnet-server-mail-perl FTBFS: t/starttls.t failure

Hi all, looking at CPAN reports [1], no bug found by CPAN testers even on Gregor machine [2] ;-) (except on Windows, which is a known problem). I'll take a look to recent SSL problems (and Net::SMTP dependencies) to try to understand. Cheers, Xavier [1] http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dis

Bug#908824: libnet-server-mail-perl FTBFS: t/starttls.t failure

Le 15/09/2018 à 17:42, Damyan Ivanov a écrit : > -=| gregor herrmann, 14.09.2018 16:08:50 +0200 |=- >> Control: tag -1 + unreproducible >> >> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:52:38 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> >>> Source: libnet-server-mail-perl >>> Version: 0.25-1 >>> Severity: serious >>> Tags: ftbfs >>> >

Bug#840943: [uscan] optimize error message for pgpmode=prev with the version situation

Hello, I'm unable to reproduce last bug you mentioned in this issue (using devscripts-2.18.4). Could you verify ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#909418: [uscan] mode=git leaves git repo on disk

Hello, I fixed the problem [MR32] and kept actual uscan behavior: keep temporary dir when --verbose is set. I think we could change this and keep temp dir only when uscan fails or (opened discussion) if --debug is set. Cheers, Xavier [MR32] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts

Bug#881954: [uscan] “user specified script” stderr not passed through concurrently

ebian/watch! Problem found in debian/2.3.2+dfsg1-2, debian/2.3_pre20180620+dfsg1-2 and master. Could you give me a tagname to reproduce this issue ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#827065: [uscan] please extend git tag support for signed git tag with pgpmode

Le 24/09/2018 à 21:24, Xavier a écrit : > Hi all, > > I have a problem to implement this: gpg accepts "--keyring" arg, so > uscan can give public key. I don't see any option to do that with "git > tag --verify" neither any environment va

Bug#827065: [uscan] please extend git tag support for signed git tag with pgpmode

Hi all, I have a problem to implement this: gpg accepts "--keyring" arg, so uscan can give public key. I don't see any option to do that with "git tag --verify" neither any environment variable... Any idea ?

Bug#898558: Retitle

retitle 898558 RFP: node-is-in-subnet -- Node.js library to check if an IP is in a subnet stop I'll not package it since it requires some TypeScript knowledge

Bug#899424: Cannot claim guest account

On Thu, May 24, 2018 12:06:09 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:55:20AM +0200, Xavier Guimard wrote: > > I'm DM for a long time (before alioth). I recently tried to associate > > my SSO account with my nm.debian.org identity: > > - find per

Bug#949277: Provide an option to specify build-needed restriction to autopkgtest

e timestamp, so that Makefile may detect that generated files don't need to be rebuilt. This requires a simple change in pkg-js-autopkgtest. Let's test that ! Cheers, Xavier

Bug#949277: Provide an option to specify build-needed restriction to autopkgtest

Le 21/01/2020 à 13:51, Xavier a écrit : > Hi, > > autopkgtest must test installed files, not generated ones, so rebuild > for test is not a good idea I think. The problem with node-levn is that > "make test" requires "make build". I fixed node-levn in salsa. Co

Bug#949580: Exclude Makefile from auto install if not explicitely set in debian/nodejs/files

Control: tags -1 + confirmed Le 22/01/2020 à 12:03, Chris Lamb a écrit : > Source: node-ws > Version: 7.2.1-2 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: buildpath > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > > Whilst

Bug#949615: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#949615: node-lodash: lodash does not export runInContext()

Le 22/01/2020 à 21:16, Xavier Guimard a écrit : > Package: node-lodash > Version: 4.17.15+dfsg-1 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > our lodash does not export while npm registry one export it. This > affects node-grunt-legacy-util upgrade. To reproduce this, try > node-

Bug#949789: libcdb-file-perl FTCBFS: computes a build architecture ARCHLIB

YPE to find the place to install arch-dependent Node.js packages. Do we have to replace DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE by DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH ? (Then a duplication of this bug could be nice) Cheers, Xavier

Bug#953636: debhelper: Something to overwrite dh_fixperms default behavior in a "auto" plugin

Xavier Guimard: > Niels Thykier: >> Xavier Guimard: >>> Package: debhelper >>> Version: 12.9 >>> Severity: wishlist >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm maintaining pkg-js-tools which provides a nodejs-module >>> auto-insta

Bug#953636: debhelper: Something to overwrite dh_fixperms default behavior in a "auto" plugin

Le 10/06/2020 à 14:21, Xavier a écrit : > Xavier Guimard: >> Niels Thykier: >>> Xavier Guimard: >>>> Package: debhelper >>>> Version: 12.9 >>>> Severity: wishlist >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I&#x

Bug#963039: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963039: node-iconv: versions of nodejs dependencies not properly documented

12.18.0~dfsg-3 > node-body-parser from testing1.19.0-2 > all others from testingfrom testing Hi Paul, could we solve this by adding a: Breaks: nodejs (<< ${binary::Version}~) in libnode72 package ? If it works, this will solve the problem for all similar packages. Cheers, Xavier

Bug#963039: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963039: Bug#963039: node-iconv: versions of nodejs dependencies not properly documented

aul Gevers a écrit : > >> Hi Jérémy and Xavier, >> >> On 19/06/2020 13.33, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > libnode68 and libnode72 can be co-installed. >> >> Sure. >> >> > /usr/bin/node is going to load the lib with the SONAME it's been built &g

Bug#964880: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964880: npm: test failures in ppc64el and s390x

Control: forcemerge -1 964854 Control: forwarded 964854 https://github.com/npm/cli/issues/1455 Le 11/07/2020 à 19:54, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Source: npm > Version: 6.14.6+ds-1 > Severity: serious > > Hello, looks like one test is failing on ppc64el and s390x. > Could you please have a

Bug#963628: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963628: Bug#963628: Node-jest fails with: Error: Cannot find module 'import-local'

Le 28/06/2020 à 09:32, Xavier a écrit : > Control: severity -1 grave > > Le 27/06/2020 à 23:31, Nilesh Patra a écrit : >> >> >> On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, 02:45 Xavier, > <mailto:y...@debian.org>> wrote: >> >> Control: severity -i grave >>

Bug#963628: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963628: Bug#963628: Node-jest fails with: Error: Cannot find module 'import-local'

Le 14/07/2020 à 22:06, Xavier a écrit : > Le 28/06/2020 à 09:32, Xavier a écrit : >> Control: severity -1 grave >> >> Le 27/06/2020 à 23:31, Nilesh Patra a écrit : >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, 02:45 Xavier, >> <mailto:y...@d

Bug#965173: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965173: Bug#965173: Bug#965173: node-rollup-plugin-buble build depends on the babeljs provides that will not be in bullseye

"babeljs" in "Provides" field. I suggests also to add "${nodejs:Provides}" to declare all installed modules. Cheers, Xavier

Bug#965353: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965353: Bug#965353: node-babel7 FTBFS: babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node/src/index.js: isArray is not defined

Le 26/07/2020 à 18:54, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 19:35, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 09:55:47PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >>>  I'm wondering if this will require another bootstraping cycle as >>> node-babel7 >>>  autopkgtest is also broken and it

Bug#953614: buster-pu: package dojo/1.14.2+dfsg1-1+deb10u2

Le 31/07/2020 à 10:27, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : > Hi Xavier, > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:09:41PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> Hi Xavier, >> >> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 07:24:14PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> Control: tags -1 + confirmed

Bug#968962: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#968962: Doesn't ship all deps from what it ships

tch, @types/braces in node-braces,... (with a breaks: node-typescript-types << new-version~ of course). We should empty node-typescript-types and remove it from Debian. This will avoid some bugs like #964637 Cheers, Xavier

Bug#958403: node-cross-spawn removal

node-execa is the last reverse dependency of node-cross-spawn. It looks like execa doesn't use risky features of cross-spawn but uses it to parse command line. Suggestion: embed cross-spawn in node-execa and ROM-RM node-cross-spawn

Bug#959786: node-cross-spawn removal

CC #959786 Le 27/08/2020 à 12:10, Xavier wrote to 958...@bugs.debian.org: > node-execa is the last reverse dependency of node-cross-spawn. It looks > like execa doesn't use risky features of cross-spawn but uses it to > parse command line. > > Suggestion: embed cross-spawn i

Bug#969214: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#969214: node-rollup-plugin-babel: Homepage is outdated

Le 29/08/2020 à 14:04, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: node-rollup-plugin-babel > Version: 4.4.0-8 > Severity: minor > > Package node-rollup-plugin-babel points to > https://github.com/rollup/rollup-plugin-babel > as its homepage. > > That page is the homepage for an archived project. > > S

Bug#969214: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#969214: node-rollup-plugin-babel: Homepage is outdated

Le 31/08/2020 à 10:51, Xavier a écrit : > Le 29/08/2020 à 14:04, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Package: node-rollup-plugin-babel >> Version: 4.4.0-8 >> Severity: minor >> >> Package node-rollup-plugin-babel points to >> https://github.com/rollup/rollup-plug

Bug#892425: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#892425: node-package-preamble: please make the output reproducible

Le 04/09/2020 à 00:58, Chris Lamb a écrit : > Chris Lamb wrote: > >> [..] > > Friendly ping on this? > > > Regards, Hi, I think we already fix that with https://bugs.debian.org/935790 Duplication ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#969719: lintian: Unable to override team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests

Le 07/09/2020 à 17:33, Felix Lechner a écrit : > Hi Xavier, > >> I'm unable to override team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests > > The first issue is caused by the slash. The inconsistency revealed by > the second is a bug in the parser. > > I have a propose

Bug#969986: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#969986: npm: Error: Cannot find module 'semver'

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Le 09/09/2020 à 19:54, Kevin Locke a écrit : > Package: npm > Version: 6.14.8+ds-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > When I run `npm --version` (or any subcommand), it prints: > > internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:968 > throw err; > ^ > > Error: Cannot

Bug#886277: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#886277: node-promise: please make the build reproducible

Control: fixed -1 8.1.0-1 Le 10/09/2020 à 10:13, Chris Lamb a écrit : > Chris Lamb wrote: > >> [..] > > Friendly ping on this? Hi, according to https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/node-promise.html, version 8.1.0-1 fixed this bug. Do you agree ? Cheers, Xavier

Bug#963539: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963539: npm: autopkgtests failures on various architectures

Le 23/06/2020 à 12:01, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Source: npm > Version: 6.14.5+ds-1 > Severity: serious > > Hello, looks like npm is failing again its autopkgtests... > > On armhf there is a timeout that I "fixed" with: > https://github.com/npm/cli/pull/1454 > > on ppc64el there is anot

Bug#963628: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963628: Node-jest fails with: Error: Cannot find module 'import-local'

e * sane * string-length * symbol-tree * throat * tmpl * tr46 * util.promisify * w3c-hr-time * walker * whatwg-encoding * whatwg-mimetype * whatwg-url * xml-name-validator Cheers, Xavier

Bug#963628: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963628: Bug#963628: Node-jest fails with: Error: Cannot find module 'import-local'

Control: severity -1 grave Le 27/06/2020 à 23:31, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, 02:45 Xavier, <mailto:y...@debian.org>> wrote: > > Control: severity -i grave > > > Thanks. > > > Le 24/06/2020 à 21:18, Nilesh

Bug#908814: origtargz: handle .asc upstream signatures

Hi, this seems enough to fix the bug: --- a/scripts/origtargz.pl +++ b/scripts/origtargz.pl @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ sub unpack_tarball (@) { for my $origtar (@origtar) { my $tmpdir = File::Temp->newdir(DIR => ".", CLEANUP => 1); +next if $origtar =~ /\.(?:asc|sig)$/; p

Bug#908814: origtargz: handle .asc upstream signatures

Le 01/07/2020 à 17:04, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 04:34:32PM +0200, Xavier wrote: >> --- a/scripts/origtargz.pl >> +++ b/scripts/origtargz.pl >> @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ sub unpack_tarball (@) { >> >> for my $origtar (@origtar) { >>

Bug#963425: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963425: node-terser: FTBFS: ERROR: `m` is not a supported option

Control: tags -1 + patch Le 05/07/2020 à 16:47, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Control: reassign -1 node-commander 4.1.1-1 > Control: affects -1 uglifyjs.terser > > Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2020-06-21 22:24:18) >> Source: node-terser >> Version: 4.1.2-6 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: FTBFS o

Bug#956027: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956027: libjs-popper.js: Upgrading libjs-popper.js buster -> bullseye results in an empty /usr/share/javascript/popper.js

Control: reopen 944821 Control: forcemerge 944821 -1 Le 06/04/2020 à 12:27, Elena ``of Valhalla'' a écrit : > Package: libjs-popper.js > Version: 1.16.0+ds2-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > When upgrading libjs-popper.js from buster to bullseye, an empty > /usr/share/javascript/p

Bug#956238: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956238: npm: autopkgtest failures in arm64 and ppc64el

Control: severity -1 important Le 08/04/2020 à 20:18, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Source: npm > Version: 6.13.4+ds-2 > Severity: serious > > Hello, looks like probably since version 6.x, a new autopkgtest introduced > has been failing on arm64, ppc64el and s390x (this one happens in Ubuntu

Bug#956402: plans for uploading a newer icu to unstable

the last step to have NodeJS 12 in unstable? Hi, yes it seems to be the last step Cheers, Xavier

Bug#956423: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956423: node-request: deprecated upstream: should not be part of next stable Debian release

Le 10/04/2020 à 23:44, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: node-request > Version: 2.88.1-4 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Upstream has deprecated this module: > https://github.com/request/request/issues/3142 > > It already has seen no new updates for a year, > a

Bug#956500: ITP: node-bash -- Utilities for using bash from node.js.

Le 12/04/2020 à 06:06, fancycade a écrit : > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Harley Swick > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > > * Package name    : node-bash >   Version : 0.0.1 >   Upstrea

Bug#956500: ITP: node-bash -- Utilities for using bash from node.js.

ugh > ;) > > Thank you for the quick response. Hi, request access via salsa and read our doc: * https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript * https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Tutorial Thanks for joining us ! Cheers, Xavier

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >