Bug#930274: RFS: junitparser/1.3.2-1 [ITP]

Hi Bastian Germann, >> >>> There is no 'debian/tests/control' file. No CI. Please see to how >>> run upstream tests by autopkgtest. >>> >>> https://ci.debian.net/ >> >> I already had a "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python" line in d/control. I >> guess this is also picked up by ci.debian.net. If

Bug#931970: gphoto2: autopkgtest failure block readline migration

Hi, On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:49:23 +0200 Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Source: gphoto2 > Version: 2.5.20-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so > > Dear Maintainer, > > The autopkgtest failures for gphoto2 are blocking the testing migration > of

Bug#932547: RFS: desktopfolder/1.1.0-2

Hi, On 7/20/19 11:14 AM, David Mohammed wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "desktopfolder" I granted upload permissions to you. Regards, Herbert

Bug#912367: stretch-pu: package gthumb/3:3.4.4.1-5

On 7/19/19 4:06 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 16:30 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> On 7/18/19 4:19 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > [...] >>> As discussed in the backlog of this bug, this should actually have >>> been 3:3.4.4.1-*5*+deb9u1, bu

Bug#912367: stretch-pu: package gthumb/3:3.4.4.1-5

[...] > >> > >> Uploaded. > > > > As discussed in the backlog of this bug, this should actually have > > been 3:3.4.4.1-*5*+deb9u1, but I see > > > > gthumb | 3:3.4.4.1-6+deb9u1 | oldstable-new | source, amd64 > > > > should that be rejected and re-uploaded? > > > > Yes! Reject the

Bug#912367: stretch-pu: package gthumb/3:3.4.4.1-5

On 7/18/19 4:19 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > hey! > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 03:55:40PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:38:15 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" >> wrote: >>> On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 16:41 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote

Bug#912367: stretch-pu: package gthumb/3:3.4.4.1-5

On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:38:15 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 16:41 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 08:17 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Control: tag -1 confirmed > [...] > > > Go ahead, thanks. > > > > Ping? > > Ping? If nothing happens by

Bug#923162: RFS: python-rfid/1.2 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:16:16 +0100 Philipp Meisberger wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-rfid" > > * Package name: python-rfid >Version : 1.2 >Upstream Author : Philipp

Bug#923158: RFS: libpam-rfid/1.4 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:17:14 +0100 Philipp Meisberger wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-rfid" > > * Package name: libpam-rfid >Version : 1.4 >Upstream Author : Philipp

Bug#922966: RFS: eclipse-package/1.0 [ITP]

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:24:51 +0100 Philipp Meisberger wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipse-package" > > * Package name: eclipse-package >Version : 1.0 >Upstream Author :

Bug#923157: RFS: libpam-fingerprint/1.5 [ITP]

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:17:04 +0100 Philipp Meisberger wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-fingerprint" > > * Package name: libpam-fingerprint >Version : 1.5 >Upstream Author :

Bug#922965: RFS: arduino-package/1.0 [ITP] --friendly greeter

Hi, On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:39:52 +0100 Philipp Meisberger wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arduino-package" > > * Package name: arduino-package >Version : 1.0 >Upstream Author :

Bug#922963: RFS: gamewake/3.5.1 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

Hi, On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:21:26 +0100 Philipp Meisberger wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gamewake" > > * Package name: gamewake >Version : 3.5.1 >Upstream Author : Philipp

Bug#922964: RFS: python-fingerprint/1.5 [ITP]

Hi, On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:59:04 +0100 Philipp Meisberger wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-fingerprint" > > * Package name: python-fingerprint >Version : 1.5 >Upstream

Bug#930274: RFS: junitparser/1.3.2-1 [ITP]

On 6/29/19 10:28 AM, Bastian Germann wrote: > Hi Herbert, > > Thanks for coming back to me. I uploaded a new version with the > suggested changes. > >> # lintian-info -t 'tag' >> >> - upstream-metadata-file-is-missing >> >>It is pedantic. There are info here to fix that: >>Refer to

Bug#930274: RFS: junitparser/1.3.2-1 [ITP]

Hi! On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 17:21:48 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "junitparser". > > * Package name: junitparser >Version : 1.3.2-1 >Upstream Author : Joel

Bug#893572: tracker.debian.org: Debian Maintainer display: [dm] links empty, should be uppercase and use parentheses

Ok. No dm.txt. Thanks Paul and Raphael. Regards, Herbert Em sáb, 15 de jun de 2019 05:52, Raphael Hertzog escreveu: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I also don't know why you picked this bug report to start your journey > > into distro-tracker. It's not a trivial issue to

Bug#893572: tracker.debian.org: Debian Maintainer display: [dm] links empty, should be uppercase and use parentheses

> Should dm.txt file be downloaded and read once a day? > (to update/save new info) > > 'class DebianContributor(models.Model)' has 'allowed_packages' and > 'is_debian_maintainer' > > Or a dictionary. > > I set 'DISTRO_TRACKER_DATA_PATH' + 'cache/dm.txt' for now. But no > downloads yet. > >

Bug#893572: tracker.debian.org: Debian Maintainer display: [dm] links empty, should be uppercase and use parentheses

On 6/13/19 6:14 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> I found where to make the change. But the information about >> who gave the permission I do not know where it is at *debian.org. >> >> In distro_tr

Bug#893572: tracker.debian.org: Debian Maintainer display: [dm] links empty, should be uppercase and use parentheses

Hi, On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 10:32:00 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 07:25:35 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > > > I think these changes are needed: > > It would also be nice to have info on who approved the package. > > > Here is how these changes should look in the HTML: > > Updated

Bug#812609: tracker.debian.org: wrong versioned links for security versions

On 6/10/19 9:10 AM, Ricardo Mones wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 08:09:23AM -0300, zaza wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:17:15 +0200 Salman Mohammadi wrote: >>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:43:38 +0100 Ricardo Mones wrote: The links to .dsc file wich appear on versioned links panel for

Bug#927785: pyparted: FTBFS randomly (Floating point exception)

forwarded 927785 https://github.com/dcantrell/pyparted/issues/57 thanks Sent debugging.txt file (Bernhard Übelacker file) On 4/23/19 6:35 AM, Bernhard Übelacker wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > I just tried to find some more information. > > I could reproduce the issue in a unstable amd64 VM > on

Bug#927785: pyparted: FTBFS randomly (Floating point exception)

Hi, Thanks Santiago and Bernhard! On 4/23/19 6:35 AM, Bernhard Übelacker wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > I just tried to find some more information. > > I could reproduce the issue in a unstable amd64 VM > on the second attempt. > > It looks like in a garbage collector run a > division by zero is

Bug#927143: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#927143: libgphoto2 2.5.22

On 4/15/19 10:53 AM, Ole Aamot wrote: > Package: libgphoto2 > Version: 2.5.22 > > I don't follow development these days, but I see that version 2.5.22 is > available from http://www.gphoto.org/ > > Best, > Ole > [copy what was sent to pkg-phototools-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net] libgphoto2

Bug#926940: unblock: watson/1.6.0-6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package watson[0] Version 1.6.0-6 fixes one Build-Depends and one upstream test. It is a good fix for reproducibility[1]. The package is "13 days old (2 needed)" [0] -

Bug#908879: pyparted: FTBFS randomly (ImportError: No module named _ped)

fixed 908879 3.11.2-3 thanks I am fixing what I did. It is registered that a fix was done by skipping (empty override) the tests. The fix for 'No module named _ped' was in version 3.11.2-3 when a patch[0] from Steve Langasek added the deps to build the _ped module. Here is the

Bug#922081: pyparted: Please enable build-time tests in pyparted

Hi, > The last try is here: > > mips, mips64el and mipsel are important > for release and they fail. > The test I skip for these archs has this first assert: self.assertGreater(len(parted.getLabels()), 0) The __init__.py file inside parted has: def getLabels(arch=None): [...] for

Bug#922081: pyparted: Please enable build-time tests in pyparted

On 2/26/19 7:55 AM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > On 2/26/19 6:07 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 01:43:03PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: >>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:37:35 -0300 Herbert Fortes wrote: >> >> It looks like this build has passed now:

Bug#922081: pyparted: Please enable build-time tests in pyparted

On 2/26/19 6:07 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 01:43:03PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:37:35 -0300 Herbert Fortes wrote: > >>> On 2/20/19 1:55 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: >>>> Package: pyparted >>>> Ver

Bug#922081: pyparted: Please enable build-time tests in pyparted

Hi, On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:37:35 -0300 Herbert Fortes wrote: > On 2/20/19 1:55 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Package: pyparted > > Version: 3.11.2-6 > > Followup-For: Bug #922081 > > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > > Usertags: origin-ubuntu d

Bug#922081: pyparted: Please enable build-time tests in pyparted

On 2/20/19 1:55 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: pyparted > Version: 3.11.2-6 > Followup-For: Bug #922081 > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco ubuntu-patch > > I think the remaining issue is entirely a bug in the debian/rules > override_dh_auto_test rule.

Bug#922402: lintian: False positive: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library

Package: lintian Version: 2.7.0 Severity: normal I got these warnings: W: libgphoto2-dev: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libgphoto2.pc -lm (line 14) W: libgphoto2-dev: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library

Bug#922379: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#922379: libgphoto2: shuts down Sony cameras upon initialization

Hi Ferenc, > Source: libgphoto2 > Version: 2.5.22-2 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > I successfully used gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor to download photos from > my Sony Alpha 5000 under jessie, but libgphoto2 broke for that camera in > stretch (I don't know

Bug#908879: pyparted: FTBFS randomly (ImportError: No module named _ped)

Hi Santiago, On 2/13/19 2:28 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > found 908879 3.11.1-12 > thanks > > Sorry for the reopening but this problem is here again. > I've put a bunch of build logs here: > > https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/pyparted/ > > and this problem also happens (randomly) in

Bug#922081: fixed in pyparted 3.11.2-3

Hi Steve, THe build has some problems with Python 2.7: - armhf -mips - mips64el

Bug#922081: pyparted: Please enable build-time tests in pyparted

On 2/11/19 6:45 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: pyparted > Version: 3.11.2-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco ubuntu-patch > > Dear Herbert, > > In Ubuntu, we have applied the attached patch to pyparted in order to enable

Bug#922027: python-django: Django security release

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:15:54 -0200 Herbert Fortes wrote: > Package: python-django > Version: Django 2.2, 1.11 > Severity: normal > > > CVE-2019-6975: Memory exhaustion in django.utils.numberformat.format() > > If django.utils.numberformat.format() -- used

Bug#922027: python-django: Django security release

Package: python-django Version: Django 2.2, 1.11 Severity: normal CVE-2019-6975: Memory exhaustion in django.utils.numberformat.format() If django.utils.numberformat.format() -- used by contrib.admin as well as the the floatformat, filesizeformat, and intcomma templates filters -- received a

Bug#787603: [src:genshi] Some sources are not included in your package

> > In order to solve this problem, you could: > 1. repack the origin tarball adding the missing source to it. > 2 add the source files to "debian/missing-sources" directory > I will add the tarball. 892K jquery-1.1.4.tar.gz Regards, Herbert

Bug#920218: RFS: webcamoid/8.5.0+dfsg-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "webcamoid". It is a upload to experimental. To test the new .symbols file, install via apt and run the software. My key is not in the archive yet. The new release closes two

Bug#918580: RFS: libgphoto2/2.5.22-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgphoto2" as I am without my key and no access to Salsa * Package name: libgphoto2 Version : 2.5.22-1 Upstream Author : Marcus Meissner and others * URL

Bug#918571: RFS: python-gphoto2/1.9.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-gphoto2" as I am without my key and access to Salsa * Package name: python-gphoto2 Version : 1.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Jim Easterbrook * URL :

Bug#913363: RFS: desktopfolder/1.0.10-1 [ITP]

On 07/12/2018 08:10, foss.freedom wrote: It has been about a month since the initial package was uploaded to mentors. Still hoping for some feedback please. Yesterday I've tweaked the package to remove an unnecessary build-dependency after discussing with upstream. I note one new

Bug#915041: does not create a subcommand '[test_without_migrations]'

The package works. I forgot to declare it in the settings.py file. But it is a module to use when developping a Django project. When one should use a virtual env and 'pip'. And the package has this lintian that I did a *-overrides (severity: normal):  -

Bug#911711: svgwrite FTBFS: tests fail

Hi, Package uploaded to "directory: /pub/UploadQueue/DELAYED/4-day)" debian/changelog file:  svgwrite (1.2.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium  .    * Non-maintainer upload.    * New upstream version 1.2.1 (Closes: #911711, #912155)  .    [ Ondřej Nový ]    * d/control: Set Vcs-* to

Bug#911711: svgwrite FTBFS: tests fail

Hi, I plan to work on this ticket[0] on the weekend. [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911711 Regards, Herbert

Bug#913261: RFS: chkboot/1.2-1 [ITP]

On 21/11/2018 13:31, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote: Hello Herbert, I hope you are well. I was wondering if you had time to take a second look at this package? No. I had to improve the Debian CI tests for some of the packages I take care. Anyone can take of that package if necessary. I can not

Bug#911711: svgwrite FTBFS: tests fail

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 23:06:30 + "foss.freedom" wrote: > I can confirm that v1.2.0 that has been released a few weeks ago > compiles just fine. > > If it helps I've created a debdiff for the changes between 1.1.8-2 and > 1.2.0 - a few tweaks to the debian package is additionally required >

Bug#913261: RFS: chkboot/1.2-1 [ITP]

Hi, On 08/11/2018 17:30, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chkboot" The package does not build twice in a row: dpkg-source: info: using

Bug#912367: stretch-pu: package gthumb/3:3.4.4.1-5

On 31/10/2018 05:32, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Herbert, [Dislcaimer: not SRM here, but only commenting on small issue below] On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 03:31:27PM -0300, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User:

Bug#908629: RFS: biometric-authentication/0.9.55-1 [ITP]

> > Another lintian: > > I: libbiometric0: symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field > > > It is a whislist and I do not know how to fix it. But > > the version in it is not 0.9.56. The version that will > > be in Debian. Please redo the file. > > As an information, lintian stops with:

Bug#908629: RFS: biometric-authentication/0.9.55-1 [ITP]

Hi, On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:54:44 +0800 handsome_feng wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "biometric-authentication" About these lintians: I: libbiometric0: hardening-no-bindnow

Bug#911867: RFS: frr/6.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hi, On 10/25/18 3:17 PM, David Lamparter wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "frr" * Package name: frr Version : 6.0.1-1 Upstream Author : FRRouting-dev * URL :

Bug#911867: RFS: frr/6.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hi, On 10/25/18 3:17 PM, David Lamparter wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "frr" * Package name: frr Version : 6.0.1-1 Upstream Author : FRRouting-dev * URL :

Bug#910966: RFS: 4pane/5.0-2

Hi, My final comments so I can upload the package: The history of debian/changelog is been changed. Please, keep the history. https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/4/4pane/changelog-5.0-1 diff -Nru 4pane-5.0/debian/changelog 4pane-5.0/debian/changelog --- 4pane-5.0/debian/changelog

Bug#910913: RFS: ghostwriter/1.7.3-1 [ITP]

On 10/14/18 8:38 AM, ghost wrote: Hi, I've uploaded my version to mentors.d.n. I thought it would cause conflict since Sebastien already uploaded the same version, but never mind. Thank you very much! I did the upload. Let's see what FTP-Master thinks. Regards, Herbert

Bug#910966: RFS: 4pane/5.0-2

On 10/14/18 11:24 AM, David Hart wrote: Hi Herbert, debian/changelog - is "UNRELEASED". - a comment: I never saw a changelog going to 'testing'. Like version 5.0-1. It is in Sid anyway. But there are less 4 lines in that part of the file I wasn't sure what was right for that field.

Bug#910966: RFS: 4pane

Hi, On 10/13/18 6:23 PM, David Hart wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an update of my package "4pane" I can not build the package right now. I did a download of the debian dir. debian/changelog - is "UNRELEASED". - a

Bug#910913: RFS: ghostwriter/1.7.3-1 [ITP]

On 10/13/18 7:56 PM, ghost wrote: Thanks for reviewing! I am neither the upstream nor the person who originally uploaded to mentors.d.n, though I am doing the most fixing part for the package for it to get into Debian... OK. I am reading files from 1.7.3-4 and there is only Sebastien name in

Bug#910913: RFS: ghostwriter/1.7.3-1 [ITP]

Hi, On 10/13/18 7:52 AM, ghost wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Forwarded Message Subject:RFS: ghostwriter/1.7.3-1 [ITP] Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 05:49:14 +1300 From: Sebastien CHAVAUX To: 894...@bugs.debian.org, ghost Dear

Bug#910245: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.10+ds.1-1

On 10/8/18 3:55 PM, Tobias Winchen wrote: Dear Herbert, I executed cowbuilder 2x in a fresh virtual machine and could not reproduce this problem. Please let me know if I can do anything else. Something was wrong with cowbuilder here. I reinstall it. Then the package was compiled. Uploading.

Bug#910245: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.10+ds.1-1

Hi, On 10/3/18 4:16 PM, Tobias Winchen wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer" I ran 'cowbuilder' 2x and got this error: # cowbuilder --build engauge-digitizer_10.10+ds.1-1.dsc cklistWizardPoints.o

Bug#910134: RFS: dmidecode/3.2-1

Hi, On 10/3/18 3:58 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmidecode" There are two changes made by Jean Delvare that is not in debian/copyright:

Bug#906721: RFS: plowshare/2.1.7-2

On 9/30/18 2:43 AM, Carl Suster wrote: Hi Herbert, Thanks for looking at my packages. I'm not really sure how the old changelog diff happened other than that the commit responsible must have been lost somewhere in the migration of the repository from GitHub to GitLab to salsa. I fixed the

Bug#906721: RFS: plowshare/2.1.7-2

Hi Carl Suster, > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plowshare" and the related > package "plowshare-modules". The main reason this is worth an upload is > that I'm shifting the way the two packages are related in

Bug#909134: Info received (Bug#909134: RFS: budgie-extras/0.6.1-1)

Uploaded. And also sent the dak-comands to FTP-Master too. Enjoy! Regards, Herbert

Bug#909134: RFS: budgie-extras/0.6.1-1

Hi David Mohammed, Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-extras" I did a review and have two questions: The budgie-quicknote/QuickNoteApplet.vala file is GPL-2+. It does not have an entry in debian/copyright.

Bug#906877: RFS: yuma123/2.11-1

Em 15-09-2018 14:36, Vladimir Vassilev escreveu: Hi Herbert, I fixed this issue and updated the package now uploaded on mentors.debian.net Removed the netconf/src/yangdiff/Makefile target from configure.ac with new patch 0004-Removed-unused-autoconf-targets.patch Updated debian/changelog.

Bug#906877: RFS: yuma123/2.11-1

Hi Vladimir Vassilev, > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yuma123" The package does not build twice because the generated netconf/src/yangdiff/Makefile file. Please add the file to dh_clean's routine. A

Bug#908278: ITP: libimagequant -- palette quantization library (development files)

Hi Andreas Tille, Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: libimagequant Version : 2.12.1 Upstream Author : Kornel Lesiński * URL : https://github.com/ImageOptim/libimagequant * License : GPL-3.0+ Programming Lang: C

Bug#907664: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.4+git20180830.01.f2dbc215fdb-1

Thanks Herver - due to the new binary with this upload (libbudgie-private0) FTP-Master has rejected the package with this message "ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed binary:libbudgie-private0 is NEW." Can this be sponsored this time around please? Uploaded to experimental. But please

Bug#907664: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.4+git20180830.01.f2dbc215fdb-1

Hi David Mohammed, I am giving you budgie-desktop upload permission. Regards, Herver

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

Em 05-08-2018 16:14, Andrey Rahmatullin escreveu: On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:54:23PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE Why? Becauso of 'blhc --all' I'm sorry

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

Em 05-08-2018 15:47, Andrey Rahmatullin escreveu: On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:23:33PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE Why? Becauso of 'blhc --all' I'm sorry

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

Em 05-08-2018 15:27, Jörg Frings-Fürst escreveu: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Herbert, thanks for your review. Am Sonntag, den 05.08.2018, 15:02 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes: Hi, -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

Em 05-08-2018 15:10, Andrey Rahmatullin escreveu: On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:02:39PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE Why? Becauso of 'blhc --all'

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

Hi, -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmidecode" Package name: dmidecode Version : 3.1-2 Upstream Author : dmidecode-de...@nongnu.org URL

Bug#905375: RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1

Em 04-08-2018 19:21, Jörg Frings-Fürst escreveu: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Herbert, Am Samstag, den 04.08.2018, 09:05 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes: Hi, > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > retitle 905375 RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-

Bug#905375: RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1

Hi, > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > retitle 905375 RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1 > thanks > I ran 'blhc --all ../*.build and there are some CXXFLAGS missing (-fPIE) LDFLAGS missing (-fPIE -pie) I saw debian/rules has 'hardening=+all' but can you please add: export

Bug#898231: RFS: budgie-extras/0.5.0-1

Hi, Em 08-05-2018 20:25, foss.freedom escreveu: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-extras" * Package name: budgie-extras Version : 0.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Ubuntu Budgie Developers *

Bug#897601: budgie-desktop: Budgie desktop and netinst

do em udev 3,9G 0 3,9G 0% /dev tmpfs 786M 9,3M 777M 2% /run /dev/mapper/debian--main-root 19G 2,6G 15G 15% / I do not have many packages installed right now. On 3 May 2018 at 14:27, Herbert Fortes <terb...@gmail.com> wrote:

Bug#897601: budgie-desktop: Budgie desktop and netinst

Package: budgie-desktop Version: 10.2.9-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I did a netinst install with no X enviroment (GNOME, MATE, LXDE, etc). And then did 'apt install budgie-desktop'. I thought that I will reboot the system and see a graphical login and after that the budgie-panel. But

Bug#897059: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#897059: (no subject)

forwarded 897059 https://github.com/gphoto/libgphoto2/issues/265 thanks Em 28-04-2018 11:10, Matti Hämäläinen escreveu: > > Hello, > > Submitted a report to libgphoto2 Github issue tracker: > https://github.com/gphoto/libgphoto2/issues/265 >

Bug#897059: Your mail

reopen 897059 thanks On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:10:35 +0300 (EEST) =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Matti_H=E4m=E4l=E4inen?= wrote: > > Hello, > > Submitted a report to libgphoto2 Github issue tracker: > https://github.com/gphoto/libgphoto2/issues/265 Ok. I will set forwarded. Regards, Herbert

Bug#897059: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#897059: Bug#897059: libgphoto2-6: libgphoto2 causes corrupted image file transfers

Em 28-04-2018 09:35, Matti Hämäläinen escreveu: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Herbert Fortes wrote: > >> Em 27-04-2018 21:26, Matti Hämäläinen escreveu: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I tested against the current upstream GIT version >>> (91

Bug#897059: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#897059: libgphoto2-6: libgphoto2 causes corrupted image file transfers

Em 27-04-2018 21:26, Matti Hämäläinen escreveu: > > Hello, > > I tested against the current upstream GIT version > (91a8425a4fa27def793fa9db2bcb4a71c26c927b) > of libgphoto2, and the problem exists there as well. > > If gphoto debug logs are needed, I can provide ones against working 2.5.16 >

Bug#897059: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#897059: libgphoto2-6: libgphoto2 causes corrupted image file transfers

severity 897059 serious thanks I will read this tomorrow Regards, Herbert Em 27-04-2018 16:23, Matti Hamalainen escreveu: > Package: libgphoto2-6 > Version: 2.5.17 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > After upgrading libgphoto2 to latest packaged version 2.5.17, I immediately >

Bug#810054: gthumb: Memory leakage

Hi, As said about a month ago Gthumb version 3:3.6.1-1~bpo9+1 was accepted in backports[0] yesterday. The NEWS file declare: version 3.5.2 * Fixed big memory leak and other minor memory leaks. If it is possible to use the backports, there will be less problems with memory leak. Enjoy! [0] -

Bug#894891: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#894891: Bug#894891: Bug#894891: pngquant: please, package new upstream version

Em 11-04-2018 14:46, Herbert Fortes escreveu: > Em 06-04-2018 09:40, Herbert Fortes escreveu: >> Em 06-04-2018 07:19, Rogério Brito escreveu: >>> Hi, Herbert. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Herbert Fortes <terb...@gmail.com> wrote: >&g

Bug#894891: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#894891: Bug#894891: pngquant: please, package new upstream version

Em 06-04-2018 09:40, Herbert Fortes escreveu: > Em 06-04-2018 07:19, Rogério Brito escreveu: >> Hi, Herbert. >> >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Herbert Fortes <terb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Em 05-04-2018 06:57, Rogério Brito escreveu: >>>> T

Bug#894891: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#894891: pngquant: please, package new upstream version

Em 06-04-2018 07:19, Rogério Brito escreveu: > Hi, Herbert. > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Herbert Fortes <terb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Em 05-04-2018 06:57, Rogério Brito escreveu: >>> The upstream of pngquant has released quite a few releases since 2.5.0

Bug#894891: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#894891: pngquant: please, package new upstream version

Em 05-04-2018 06:57, Rogério Brito escreveu: > Package: pngquant > Version: 2.5.0-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi. > > The upstream of pngquant has released quite a few releases since 2.5.0 > that's currently in Debian. The current version is 2.11.7. > > Can we, please, have something newer than

Bug#894307: RFS: pgn2web/0.4-2 [ITA]

Em 01-04-2018 05:25, Jose G. López escreveu: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 09:29:02 -0300 > Herbert Fortes <terb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jose G. López, >> >> I ran 'blhc --all' and there are some CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS >> missing '-fPIE' '-fPIE -pie'. &g

Bug#894307: RFS: pgn2web/0.4-2 [ITA]

Hi Jose G. López, > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pgn2web": > > * Package name : pgn2web > Version : 0.4-2 > Upstream Author : William Hoggarth > * URL :

Bug#893661: gthumb: Memory leakage

Hi Patrick, > Package: gthumb > Version: 3:3.4.4.1-5 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > I'm using gthumb 3.4.4.1 which is the version available in the current Debian > Stable repositories. It seems to have a big memory leak: From the moment I > open > the program, every picture I

Bug#892280: libcdk5: library package needs to be renamed for libncurses6 transition

Em 11-03-2018 17:35, Sven Joachim escreveu: > On 2018-03-11 10:57 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > >> Em 10-03-2018 15:24, Sven Joachim escreveu: >>> On 2018-03-10 09:31 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: >>> >>>> Em 09-03-2018 17:03, Sven Joachim escreveu: >&

Bug#892114: libcdk5: libcdk5.symbols is not up to date

Em 05-03-2018 16:41, Sven Joachim escreveu: > On 2018-03-05 16:25 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > >> Em 05-03-2018 15:45, Sven Joachim escreveu: >>> Source: libcdk5 >>> Version: 5.0.20161210-5 >>> Severity: minor >>> Tags: patch >>> >&

Bug#892280: libcdk5: library package needs to be renamed for libncurses6 transition

Em 10-03-2018 15:24, Sven Joachim escreveu: > On 2018-03-10 09:31 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > >> Em 09-03-2018 17:03, Sven Joachim escreveu: >>> On 2018-03-09 15:18 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sven Joachim, >>>>

Bug#892280: libcdk5: library package needs to be renamed for libncurses6 transition

Em 09-03-2018 17:03, Sven Joachim escreveu: > On 2018-03-09 15:18 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > >> Hi Sven Joachim, >> >>>> My conclusion is that it is very risky to allow such combinations, and >>>> to rule them out I propose to change the package nam

Bug#892280: libcdk5: library package needs to be renamed for libncurses6 transition

Hi Sven Joachim, >> My conclusion is that it is very risky to allow such combinations, and >> to rule them out I propose to change the package name of the cdk >> library, say to libcdk5a. It would then have to build-depend on >> libncurses-dev (>= 6.1+20180210) to ensure that it is linked

  1   2   3   >