Bug#987503: swap partition only 1 GB instead of at least 1 x RAM size

2022-12-08 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Hi all, we do second this. While we always installed workstations automatically with debian preseeding and the default receipts (lvm encrypted) we noticed the defaults suddenly changed in bullseye. I would support the assumption that for server installations this is not a big issue since one (at

Bug#912224: since update 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u5 php ldap authentification failure

2019-09-17 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Hi again, Am 17.09.19 um 18:02 schrieb Mike Gabriel: > Hi, > completing the story... > > During package upgades, I see upgrade failures: > > ``` > root@jessie:~# apt-get install 389-ds-base --reinstall > Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig > Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut. >

Bug#912224: since update 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u5 php ldap authentification failure

2019-09-17 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Hi Mike, Am 17.09.19 um 17:38 schrieb Mike Gabriel: > What I did: > > 1. Setup a fresh 389-ds instance using jessie's original version > (see http://snapshot.debian.org/package/389-ds-base/1.3.3.5-4/) > > 2. Upgrade to +deb8u4, test login, LDAP queries, etc. > > -> worked > > 3. Upgrade to

Bug#912224: since update 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u5 php ldap authentification failure

2019-09-12 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Hi Mike, hi Hugo, Am 11.09.19 um 14:04 schrieb Mike Gabriel: > Hi Hugo, > > sorry for the late reply on this urgent matter. > > On  So 08 Sep 2019 10:46:26 CEST, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > >> Sorry for the very late answer. For some reason, it looks like the LTS >> team >> was not aware of this

Bug#912224: since update 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u5 php ldap authentification failure

2018-10-29 Thread Jan Kowalsky
to mention: with version 1.3.5.17-2 in stretch everything works fine again.

Bug#912224: since update 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u5 php ldap authentification failure

2018-10-29 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Package: 389-ds Version: 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u5 Severity: high since 26.10.2018 our nextcloud installations can't authenticate against 389-ds anymore. This seems to have an relation to the latest update in 389-ds - it happend after we applied these two updates: 389-ds-base (1.3.3.5-4+deb8u5)

Bug#911223: still references for icedove and iceweasel in /etc/mate/defaults.list

2018-10-17 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Package: debian-mate-default-settings Version: 1.16.1-1 Severity: normal Since iceweasel and icedove are replaced in Debian stretch completely, the mate defaults.list should be updated accordingly. The actual settings leads e.g. to the problem, that in ltsp environment an remote thunderbird

Bug#910874: unattended-upgrades removes packages even if

2018-10-12 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Package: unattended-upgrades Version: 0.93.1+nmu1 Severity: serious Even if I have configured 'Remove-Unused-Dependencies "false";' in apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades: // Do automatic removal of new unused dependencies after the upgrade // (equivalent to apt-get autoremove)

Bug#905184: [Pkg-freeipa-devel] Bug#905184: upgrade of 389-ds-base fails if /var/lib/dirsrv is on different partition as /etc

2018-09-03 Thread Jan Kowalsky
solves the issue: --- updates.orig/60upgradeconfigfiles.pl2018-09-03 09:58:45.911804203 +0200 +++ updates/60upgradeconfigfiles.pl 2018-09-03 09:59:36.420699451 +0200 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ next if (! -f $oldname); # does not exist - skip - already (re)moved my $newname

Bug#905184: [Pkg-freeipa-devel] Bug#905184: upgrade of 389-ds-base fails if /var/lib/dirsrv is on different partition as /etc

2018-09-03 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Hi Timo, sorry for delay, I missed the mail. > What if you change 'rename' with 'move' in /usr/share/dirsrv/updates/*.pl? It's suffucient to change it in /usr/share/dirsrv/updates/60upgradeconfigfiles.pl then it works fine. Regards Jan

Bug#905184: upgrade of 389-ds-base fails if /var/lib/dirsrv is on different partition as /etc

2018-08-01 Thread Jan Kowalsky
Package: 389-ds-base Version: 1.3.5.17-2 Severity: serious Upgrade to newer version of 389-ds-base fails with dpkg configuration error on postinstall script /var/lib/dpkg/info/389-ds-base.postinst After getting full log of postinstall I saw: [18/08/01:10:33:37] - [Setup] Info Could not rename