Bug#1032029: mosquitto ignores ip address for websocket listeners

2023-03-15 Thread Roger Light
Unfortunately this was marked as spam, so I didn't see it. The attached patch will deny the use of listener bind addresses for websockets listeners. I also note that using a more recent version of libwebsockets does not display the same problem. Regards, Roger On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 19:39,

Bug#986701: mosquitto: CVE-2021-28166

2021-04-09 Thread Roger Light
This will be fixed soon, I would like to include an autopkgtest in the package, otherwise this would have been updated already. On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 20:27, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Source: mosquitto > Version: 2.0.9-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: security upstream > Justification: user

Bug#983429: mosquitto: /run/mosquitto is on a tmpfs and should be created dynamically

2021-02-25 Thread Roger Light
The systemd unit file should recreate the folder each time the service is started. It uses /var/run/mosquitto instead of /run/mosquitto, but that should work through the /var/run symlink. Does this definitely not work for you? On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 01:15, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > > Package:

Bug#977637: libwebsockets: Please enable LWS_WITH_EXTERNAL_POLL support in libwebsockets

2021-02-10 Thread Roger Light
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 16:49, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > It was always a hack, few people used it and generated way too many messages. It's a straightforward interface to indicate to the application when a socket needs read/write. lws might not like it, but it's simple and it works fine.

Bug#977637: libwebsockets: Please enable LWS_WITH_EXTERNAL_POLL support in libwebsockets

2021-02-09 Thread Roger Light
Sorry, I forgot to say that from my point of view this is an RC level bug for mosquitto, even if it isn't one for libwebsockets itself.

Bug#977637: libwebsockets: Please enable LWS_WITH_EXTERNAL_POLL support in libwebsockets

2021-02-09 Thread Roger Light
The external poll feature has been part of libwebsockets since the beginning, and that's what Mosquitto uses. Relatively recently the developer decided he didn't like that anymore and is going to remove it, but has disabled it for now. I've asked about it and was told that he didn't want to

Bug#977637: libwebsockets: Please enable LWS_WITH_EXTERNAL_POLL support in libwebsockets

2020-12-17 Thread Roger Light
Package: libwebsockets Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The libwebsockets support in Mosquitto requires the external poll support, but this is not enabled in libwebsockets by default. Please consider enabling it by adding LWS_WITH_EXTERNAL_POLL to the rules file.

Bug#940229: uses killall in logrotate snippet

2019-09-17 Thread Roger Light
Thank you. The more recent systemd unit files already include the HUP command. I have changed the logrotate command to use invoke-rc.d as per your suggestion. I have done this for the new 1.6.6 upload I've just sent to mentors. In terms of updating stable, I haven't had much luck with that in the

Bug#923818: mosquitto: provide systemd unit

2019-03-06 Thread Roger Light
What version are you using? The version in testing has a systemd unit. On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 18:45, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > Source: mosquitto > Severity: wishlist > > It would be useful if mosquitto provided a systemd unit, I suggest > something like: > > [Unit] > Description=mosquitto MQTT

Bug#911104: mosquitto: New upstream release available

2018-10-17 Thread Roger Light
Hi Andreas, Thanks for taking the time to look at it - there are a number of changes in the 1.5 series of mosquitto which remove the need for the majority of the patches. I've got an updated package but because there were a few changes I wanted to give it a bit more of a test and simply hadn't

Bug#885027: stretch-pu: package mosquitto/1.4.10-3+deb9u1

2018-02-10 Thread Roger Light
t; > Cheers, > Julien > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:13:06 +, Roger Light wrote: > >> Thanks for taking a look at this. >> >> The application only creates this file and log files, so I don't >> believe it should have any other impact. >> >> Re

Bug#885027: stretch-pu: package mosquitto/1.4.10-3+deb9u1

2018-02-10 Thread Roger Light
017 at 23:47:34 +, Roger A. Light wrote: > >> +Description: Fix for CVE-207-9868. >> +Author: Roger Light <ro...@atchoo.org> >> +Forwarded: not-needed >> +Origin: upstream, >> https://mosquitto.org/files/cve/2017-9868/mosquitto-1.4.x_cve-2017-9868

Bug#794476: Fwd: Libwebsockets: please update to at lease 1.3

2015-08-05 Thread Roger Light
The updated package I have prepared is in the git repository at: https://github.com/ralight/libwebsockets-debian I can provide a debdiff if you would like. Thanks, Roger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-08 Thread Roger Light
Hi Eriberto, 3. Is normal this issue? I got this message in a clean jail and in cowbuilder/pbuilder. Please, try in cowbuilder: Ok, I did get these in normal building (tried it in cowbuilder as well). I've checked and they're not important. There won't be any trace dumps in the next release.

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-08 Thread Roger Light
Hi Eriberto, 1. Update d/copyright. The current copyright for Troy is 2003-2013. Oh yes, I missed that. 2. I found: # This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project for use in # the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/) # This product includes cryptographic software

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-05 Thread Roger Light
Hi Eriberto, 1. You need to put all changes in d/changelog. You can use your VCS to check it. Ok, I have done this. 2. In d/changelog, you should use urgency=medium, not high. Fixed. 3. The cowbuilder builds the package. However, when building the package in a new Sid environment (new,

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-01 Thread Roger Light
Hi Eriberto, Thanks for taking the time to start a review. 1. Update the Standards-Version from 3.9.4 to 3.9.5. Done 2. d/copyright: please, update the years (include 2014, because I found it in your upstream code). Done. 3. d/docs: The final user doesn't compiles codes. So, send

Bug#754787: mosquitto: does not handle errors from authentication plugins correctly

2014-07-14 Thread Roger Light
Source: mosquitto Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole If an end user uses mosquitto with an authentication plugin, and the plugin returns an application error when making an authentication check (such as if a database was unavailable), then

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.3.2-1 RC

2014-07-14 Thread Roger Light
prefer the latest release to be considered. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 1.3.2-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD-3-clause Section : net It builds those binary packages: libmosquitto

Bug#725014: mosquitto: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2013-09-30 Thread Roger Light
This is caused by a hardcoded test value that is different on hurd. It will be fixed in the next upload. On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: Package: mosquitto Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: important User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi,

Bug#719207: RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1

2013-08-20 Thread Roger Light
Hi Vincent, Thanks for taking the time to carry out a review. - debian/control: the dependency of libmosquitto-dev is quite odd. Why not (= ${binary:Version})? I understand that you avoid to upgrade the binary package if there is only packaging changes, but sometimes, packaging

Bug#719207: RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1

2013-08-09 Thread Roger Light
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto * Package name: mosquitto Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD-3-clause

Bug#699651: RFS: mosquitto/1.1.2-1

2013-02-11 Thread Roger Light
I have now fixed the changes, including an upstream release for some of the fixes: * Package name: mosquitto Version : 1.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD-3-clause Section : net

Bug#699651: RFS: mosquitto/1.1.2-1

2013-02-06 Thread Roger Light
Thanks for the detailed review - in particular for the information on python-all. I have fixed the majority of the errors but not yet re-uploaded because I am still deciding what to do about mosquitto_passwd What happened to python-mosquitto's Depends? They are unneeded now that

Bug#699651: RFS: mosquitto/1.1.2-1

2013-02-02 Thread Roger Light
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto for uploading to experimental only. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 1.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-29 Thread Roger Light
Hi, On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:59 AM, David Prévot taf...@debian.org wrote: doesn't seem in line with the current freeze policy [0], Rule #1: “do not make changes to the package that are not related to fixing the bugs in question […] this implies *not* […] Changing debhelper compat version” I

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-29 Thread Roger Light
Hi David, Thanks, the three RC-bug fixes are pretty straightforward, but the DEP-3 headers don't contain an Applied-Upstream field. Since you seem involved upstream, are those fixes not applied upstream because of a rewrite of those parts in the current code? If not, could you please point to

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-28 Thread Roger Light
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.15-2 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : 3 clause

Bug#651688: [pkg-ggz-maintainers] Bug#651688: Bug#651688: Should ggz-server be orphaned or removed from Debian?

2012-01-02 Thread Roger Light
It appears that Josef is no longer active He replied to my email fairly promptly so I'm sure he'll do so with this as well. .  I was just the sponsor/helper here, so I don't know the status of upstream etc. very well.  At one point, these libraries had a reverse dependency into GNOME, but I

Bug#651688: [pkg-ggz-maintainers] Bug#651688: Should ggz-server be orphaned or removed from Debian?

2011-12-13 Thread Roger Light
Hi Ansgar, I've spoken with Josef Spillner, the old GGZ project lead and we both agree that the best course of action is for the GGZ packages to be removed from Debian. It's not fair to leave the maintenance in the hands of the distributors. Cheers, Roger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to