Hi,
wow, almost exactly one year :-/
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 21:59, giskard wrote:
...
I was reminded of this issue when I saw that #156614 was closed (an RFP for
cinelerra).
A while ago cinelerra(-cvs) 2.1 has been released and I would like to know if
the issues described in this bug
Hi,
please respect the reply-to: and subscribe to the bugs if you're interested in
solving them... Thanks.
On Saturday 01 October 2005 15:05, Riccardo Setti wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cinelerra-cvs
Version
Il giorno mer, 05/10/2005 alle 20.39 +0200, Holger Levsen ha scritto:
hello,
Hi,
Besides the original upstream (Heroine Virtual Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED])
the people at http://cvs.cinelerra.org/devcorner/cvswrite.html (or the URL
itself) should be mentioned.
i don't know :) probably you are in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cinelerra-cvs
Version : 2.0-cvs
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
Description : non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 03:05:08PM +0200, Riccardo Setti wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cinelerra-cvs
Version : 2.0-cvs
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License :
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
You know there has been an RFP on cinelerra itself for a very
long time, almost 5 years. See bugs.debian.org/78209, 156614,
239570.
Why do you want to have a CVS version from the package if there
even isn't a normal version of it in the archive?
cinelerra is forked. To
6 matches
Mail list logo
