On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
That's a good idea. Does something like the following (untested)
patch work for you?
Yes, I've just tested it, and it works. Thanks!
Just another thought. Do you
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
tags 397123 + patch
thanks
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The check_watches() function is disk-intensive on flaky systems like
the Hurd, but even on robust machines, sbuild could go even faster if
there was a way to disable it
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
tags 397123 + patch
thanks
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The check_watches() function is disk-intensive on flaky systems like
the Hurd, but even on robust machines, sbuild could go even faster if
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.52
Severity: wishlist
The check_watches() function is disk-intensive on flaky systems like
the Hurd, but even on robust machines, sbuild could go even faster if
there was a way to disable it (sometimes, some people want to build as
many packages as possible in as little
tags 397123 + patch
thanks
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The check_watches() function is disk-intensive on flaky systems like
the Hurd, but even on robust machines, sbuild could go even faster if
there was a way to disable it (sometimes, some people want to build as
many packages
5 matches
Mail list logo