On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:00:41PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
There are some differences in how thee systems define lists; and
I think markdown is more forgiving with simple lists Consider that
continuing lines in markdown lists do not have to be aligned after the
white
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:00:41PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
So, here is my take on a subset that needs to be supported in
policy (I do not think we need titles, don't you agree?)
I agree, we don't want titles.
a) Unordered lists use asterisks, pluses, and hyphens —
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:43:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Looking at the bug report, I can agree that there is a rough
consensusabout using a standard text-based markup language to
interpret package long descriptions. What is unclear, though, which of
the two equivalent
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:25:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:43:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Looking at the bug report, I can agree that there is a rough
consensusabout using a standard text-based markup language to
interpret package long
Hi,
There are some differences in how thee systems define lists; and
I think markdown is more forgiving with simple lists Consider that
continuing lines in markdown lists do not have to be aligned after the
white space:
Markdown
--8---cut
package debian-policy
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
usertag 525843 = normative discussion
thanks
Hi,
Looking at the bug report, I can agree that there is a rough
consensusabout using a standard text-based markup language to
interpret package long descriptions. What is
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.1.0
Severity: wishlist
[ submitting bug report as requested at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2009/04/msg00155.html ]
Andreas Tille, has recently (re-)raised the issue of consistent
formatting of lists in long descriptions [1,2].
[1]
7 matches
Mail list logo
