us Hustad
Subject: Re: [Python-apps-team] Bug#818107: The future of DocOnce
Hi,
this looks like an interesting project indeed.
As a first step I went through the list of dependencies that Kristian provided.
The situation might not be so grim.
Unfortunately, there is no information about the actua
Hi,
this looks like an interesting project indeed.
As a first step I went through the list of dependencies that Kristian provided.
The situation might not be so grim.
Unfortunately, there is no information about the actually required versions,
but for a number of packages a manual update over the
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 21:57:11 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Now I hope the Debian Python Applications Packaging Team will consider
> packaging it...
Dear Debian Python Applications Packaging Team,
will you consider packaging the new version, please?
Please let me know, thanks for your time.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:03:07 + Kristian Gregorius Hustad wrote:
> Version 1.0.0 is now listed at https://github.com/hplgit/doconce/releases
That's awesome, thanks a lot! :-)
Now I hope the Debian Python Applications Packaging Team will consider
packaging it...
--
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 00:03:20 + Kristian Gregorius Hustad wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Kristian,
thanks a lot for your prompt reply.
>
> I think the main reason why the Debian packages haven't been kept
> up to date is in part that the list of dependencies have become very
> large and complex. Some
Hello,
I think the main reason why the Debian packages haven't been kept up to date is
in part that the list of dependencies have become very large and complex. Some
of the dependencies are installed from PIP or even cloned from git (the full
list can be found at
Hello,
I am a Free Software user and contributor from Italy.
I became interested in DocOnce, since I think it's a very promising
documentation format and system.
I wanted to see a more up-to-date version of DocOnce included in Debian
(my GNU/Linux distribution of choice), hence I filed a bug
7 matches
Mail list logo
