Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-28 Thread Stephan Sürken
On Di, 2016-11-22 at 11:33 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: (...) > Thanks for your effort! I have just uploaded 1.0.3-3. > > Would you (Stephan) be so kindly and upload it to jessie-bpo, if > there > are no new problems with it? I will be on vacation before it may ent fwiw, I did just port this.

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-23 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:21:02AM +0100, Stephan Sürken wrote: > @evgeni: Would be nice if you could retest this. tbh, I stopped using apt-dater, so I'd rather not :)

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-23 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi Patrick, On Di, 2016-11-22 at 11:33 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: (...) > > S > Thanks for your effort! I have just uploaded 1.0.3-3. ok, thx! > Would you (Stephan) be so kindly and upload it to jessie-bpo, if > there > are no new problems with it? I will be on vacation before it may >

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-22 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 21.11.2016 um 11:49 schrieb Stephan Sürken: > Hi Patrick, > > On Mo, 2016-11-21 at 10:12 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > (...) > >>> S >> Ok so adding patch >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827339#34 and drop >> current patch 01-grep-syntax-error ? > sure, that would be my

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-21 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi Patrick, On Mo, 2016-11-21 at 10:12 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: (...) > > S > Ok so adding patch > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827339#34 and drop > current patch 01-grep-syntax-error ? sure, that would be my suggestion. For your Debian patch, you should maybe only

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-21 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 18.11.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Stephan Sürken: > Hi, > > On Fr, 2016-11-18 at 17:01 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Am 17.11.2016 um 18:52 schrieb Stephan Sürken: >>> Hi Patrick, >>> >>> On Do, 2016-11-17 at 15:40 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >>> (...) Then the question is, why it does

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-18 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi, On Fr, 2016-11-18 at 17:01 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Am 17.11.2016 um 18:52 schrieb Stephan Sürken: > > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > On Do, 2016-11-17 at 15:40 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > (...) > > > > > > Then the question is, why it does not work on Jessies grep? > > did you

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-18 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 17.11.2016 um 18:52 schrieb Stephan Sürken: > Hi Patrick, > > On Do, 2016-11-17 at 15:40 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > (...) >> Then the question is, why it does not work on Jessies grep? > did you overlook my comment? Or are my findings wrong? > > Thx! > > S Ah now I get it. You have

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-17 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi Patrick, On Do, 2016-11-17 at 15:40 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: (...) > Then the question is, why it does not work on Jessies grep? did you overlook my comment? Or are my findings wrong? Thx! S

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 10.11.2016 um 22:09 schrieb Thomas Liske: > Hi, > > this is a negative lookbehind assertion - quoting from perlre(1): > >"(?A zero-width negative lookbehind assertion. For example >"/(?follow "bar". Works only for fixed-width

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-11 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi all, On Do, 2016-11-10 at 22:09 +0100, Thomas Liske wrote: (...) > this is a negative lookbehind assertion - quoting from perlre(1): (...) Afaics, the hardcoded default value for err-pattern falsely uses HTML entities. These are needed in the XML config obviously, but not in getXPropStr()

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-11-10 Thread Thomas Liske
Hi, this is a negative lookbehind assertion - quoting from perlre(1): "(? writes: > Am 30.10.2016 um 12:31 schrieb Stephan Sürken: >> Hi Evgeni, Patrick, >> >> fwiw (probably this is already worked on), i have fixed up my system by >> >> * reverting 01-grep-syntax-error.diff >> >>

Bug#827339: Please revert patch for cmd, and fix default pattern

2016-10-30 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi Evgeni, Patrick, fwiw (probably this is already worked on), i have fixed up my system by * reverting 01-grep-syntax-error.diff This actually totally breaks things, as this now uses "P" as pattern, practically matching always: -- grep -aiqseP "$AD_HIST_ERRPATTERN" "$AD_HIST_PATH/typescript"