Bug#837485: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#837485: Bug#837485: golang-1.6: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled

Tianon Gravi: > On 5 November 2016 at 09:00, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Cool! :) >> >> Should I file a bug against ftp.d.o, asking them to remove golang-1.6 >> from unstable? :) > > If you're willing, that sounds great! (I always end up having to > re-read the docs any time I use

Bug#837485: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#837485: Bug#837485: golang-1.6: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled

On 5 November 2016 at 09:00, Niels Thykier wrote: > Cool! :) > > Should I file a bug against ftp.d.o, asking them to remove golang-1.6 > from unstable? :) If you're willing, that sounds great! (I always end up having to re-read the docs any time I use the BTS for more than

Bug#837485: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#837485: Bug#837485: golang-1.6: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled

Tianon Gravi: > On 31 October 2016 at 17:50, Tianon Gravi wrote: >> Checking reverse dependencies... >> # Broken Build-Depends: >> golang-github-docker-go: golang-1.6-go >> golang-1.6-src >> >> Dependency problem found. > > After that last

Bug#837485: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#837485: Bug#837485: golang-1.6: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled

On 31 October 2016 at 17:50, Tianon Gravi wrote: > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Build-Depends: > golang-github-docker-go: golang-1.6-go > golang-1.6-src > > Dependency problem found. After that last golang-github-docker-go upload, we're

Bug#837485: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#837485: Bug#837485: golang-1.6: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled

On 31 October 2016 at 17:12, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > The question is, do we backport the fixes for golang-1.6, or just remove it > from the archive? Looks like removal would be fairly straightforward; the only package currently affected is