-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 13:29 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> I'm terribly sorry if we are being pushy here, it is indeed with no
> bad faith and we definitely don't want to annoy anyone. And yes, we
> are targeting at removing qt4
Hi again!
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 13:23, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> Yes I mind. I’m sorry my schedule doesn’t align with yours, but I honestly
> don’t see the urgency here. I’m not asking you to wait for months, I’m just
> trying to find some time to properly review and integrate Moritz
Yes I mind. I’m sorry my schedule doesn’t align with yours, but I honestly
don’t see the urgency here. I’m not asking you to wait for months, I’m just
trying to find some time to properly review and integrate Moritz patch. And the
way you push is a bit annoying right now. I’m sure it’s not
Hi!
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 12:49, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> Please don’t, I already told Moritz I’ll handle it when I have time.
That's just great! Do you mind if, once we get out of testing the two
other blockers, we ask the RT to remove lightdm from testing? It will
still re enter testing
Please don’t, I already told Moritz I’ll handle it when I have time.
—
Yves-Alexis
> On 17 Sep 2019, at 16:46, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
>
> Hi Yves-Alexis!
>
> lightdm is now one of the three packages holding qt4 in testing. Would
> it be possible for you to apply the
Hi Yves-Alexis!
lightdm is now one of the three packages holding qt4 in testing. Would
it be possible for you to apply the patch Moritz sent? If you can't
I'll be happy to NMU it.
Cheers, Lisandro.
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
6 matches
Mail list logo
