Bug#294688: CAN-2005-0299: Directory traversal in GForge

On 11/02/2005-06:32, Martin Schulze wrote: > Package: gforge > Version: 3.1-26 > Severity: grave > Tags: security sarge sid patch > > The sid/sarge version seems to be vulnerable to this. Please correct it. > The correction should be in the GForge CVS, otherwise sanitising the dir > should be ea

Bug#294399: marked as done (needs rebuild aganst libevent)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:17:07 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294399: fixed in scanssh 2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 17:15 +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: [...] > I think it would be cleaner and simpler to modify the existing > md5module.c to use the openssl md5 layer API (this is just a > search/replace to change the function names). The bigger problem is > deciding what/how/whether to include

Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 23:13 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: > On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: [...] > > Only problem with this, is pyopenssl doesn't yet include any mdX or sha > > modules. > > My bad, how about M2Crypto

Bug#293207: bogofilter: last two versions caused db errors

A report on my findings thus far: I set up a pristine test environment to try and replicate the problem that Karl has been having. I have been able to setup a system running exim with the same configuration that Karl has, plugged into delivering mail through bogofilter, using the same bogofilter c

Bug#294684: marked as done (apt depends on experimental libgcc1)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:38:39 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294684: apt depends on experimental libgcc1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#294690: CAN-2005-0300: Directory traversal in JSBoard

Package: jsboard Version: 2.0.10-2 Severity: grave Tags: sarge sid security patch Please fix the directory traversal vulnerability. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=110627201120011&w=2 Details === PHP has a feature discarding the input values containing null characters when magic_qu

Bug#294688: CAN-2005-0299: Directory traversal in GForge

Package: gforge Version: 3.1-26 Severity: grave Tags: security sarge sid patch The sid/sarge version seems to be vulnerable to this. Please correct it. The correction should be in the GForge CVS, otherwise sanitising the dir should be easy (i.e. recursively strip "../"). Candidate: CAN-2005-0299

Bug#294689: wrong defines vars in Makefile

Package: lirc-modules-source Version: 0.7.1pre1-2 Severity: grave Tags: patch Makefiles defines serial_CFLAGS (also sir and parallel) but uses SERIAL_CFLAGS, this make modules compile fails if using serial/parallel/sir here a patch to solve it: --- Makefile.orig 2005-01-25 22:12:45.000

Bug#104394: Better prices for your Software than going to your local Software store.

Enjoy our selected Software in stock Check the site for OEM software that provides the same function and reliability the retail version provides. Don't want to pay high price for the package and manual? Sure. We provide quality along with great prices! http://www.forurprivacy.com/oe/ Why not get

Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: [...] One possible alternative would be to bring in something like PyOpenSSL

Bug#294684: apt depends on experimental libgcc1

Package: apt Version: 0.5.28.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt 0.5.28.2[for i386, autobuilts are probably fine] depends on the experimental version of libgcc1[>=1:4.0, sid has 1:3.4.3-9] making it uninstallable. A rebuild in a proper build environment is probably suff

Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: > On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: [...] > One possible alternative would be to bring in something like PyOpenSSL > and jus

Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: The md5.h/md5c.c files allow "copy and use", but no modification of the files. There are some alternative implementations, i.e. in glibc, openssl, so a replacement should be sage. Any other

Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: > > The md5.h/md5c.c files allow "copy and use", but no modification of > > the files. There are some alternative implementations, i.e. in glibc, > > openssl, so a replacement should be sage. Any other requirements when > > considering a re

Bug#294667: marked as done (libusb-0.1-4: Libusb-0.1-4 v1:0.1.9-2 Will not read data properly from USB Scanners, corrupts output.)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:34:41 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294667: libusb-0.1-4: Libusb-0.1-4 v1:0.1.9-2 Will not read data properly from USB Scanners, corrupts output. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#269330: marked as done (htdig: description contains tabs)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#269330: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#290840: marked as done (htdig weekly script error)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#281822: marked as done (htdig: missing space in /etc/cron.daily/htdig)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#271971: marked as done (htdig with bad cronfiles)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#269080: marked as done (htdig: cron scripts are broken)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#268793: marked as done (/etc/cron.weekly/htdig script is broken)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#268870: marked as done (Syntax errors in /etc/cron.weekly/htdig)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#278315: marked as done (patch for /etc/cron.weekly/htdig)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#294667: libusb-0.1-4: Libusb-0.1-4 v1:0.1.9-2 Will not read data properly from USB Scanners, corrupts output.

Package: libusb-0.1-4 Version: 1:0.1.9-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package renders nearly any device access with libusb impossible. Things are being griped about on D-D and D-U. I have back rev'd to the Sarge version and everything Works Honky Dory. -- System

Bug#294526: marked as done (simpletal: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:17:27 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294526: fixed in simpletal 3.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#294121: Dependencies on libdiscover2 and discover-date missing

On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:04:15 -0500, Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > This is already fixed in Subversion. I'm going to wait another day to > see if there are other problems before uploading. A small one. /etc/discover.conf.d/00discover is in libdiscover2. So the behaviour of discove

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#294627: debconf: syntax error in dpkg-preconfigure

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 294627 grave Bug#294627: debconf: syntax error in dpkg-preconfigure Severity set to `grave'. > merge 293666 294627 Bug#293666: debconf: Error with dpkg-preconfigure Bug#294627: debconf: syntax error in dpkg-preconfigure Bug#293710: extranious

Processed: Re: Bug#294627: debconf: syntax error in dpkg-preconfigure

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 294627 Bug#294627: debconf: syntax error in dpkg-preconfigure 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > merge 293666 294627 Bug#293666

Processed: duplicate bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 294607 libwvstreams4.0-extras Bug#294607: =?iso-8859-15?q?Hi=2E_After_I_upgraded_to_wvdial_1=2E54_I_get_=22Cannot_s?= =?iso-8859-15?q?et_information_for_serial_port=22_=0D=0Awhen_I_connect_via_g?= =?iso-8859-15?q?prs_on_my_usb_Motorola_phone

Bug#294628: openoffice.org: impress crashes when trying to modify style of a text box

Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable impress crashes when in an empty presentation, with a layout including a text box, you try to 'modify style...' and then change the 'font style' or 'font size' (btw, writer works fine) it saves all

Bug#294626: apt-proxy: 1.9.25 broken with python2.3 upgrade (missing profile)

Package: apt-proxy Version: 1.9.25 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Apparently a change to python has caused AP to no longer be able to start. The python 2.3.5-1 package has removed the profile.py. I'm not a python programmer so I don't know if this is related or not, but i

Bug#294627: debconf: syntax error in dpkg-preconfigure

Package: debconf Version: 1.4.43 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software On an upgrade just now... Reading changelogs... Done apt-listchanges: Do you want to continue? [Y/n]? y String found where operator expected at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 96, near "die sprintf(gett

Processed: Re: Bug#294609: gnome-icon-theme: Plain text document icon missing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 294609 libgtk2.0-0 Bug#294609: gnome-icon-theme: Plain text document icon missing Bug reassigned from package `gnome-icon-theme' to `libgtk2.0-0'. > severity 294609 serious Bug#294609: gnome-icon-theme: Plain text document icon missing Severit

Bug#294621: xwhois: server file is not found, program won't start (same problem as in bug #43467)

Package: xwhois Version: 0.4.2-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable # apt-get install xwhois $ xwhois Could not open xwhois server file '/usr/share/xwhois/xwhois.servers'! $ echo this did not work $ cp /etc/X11/xwhois/servers ~/.xwhois.servers $ xwhois $ echo Now it works!

Bug#294526: simpletal: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

Hi, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: simpletal Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'simpletal' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: cd . && python setup.py build --build-base="./build" /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 Please add the missing

Bug#294607: which version? (was: Re: Bug#294607)

> Hi. After I upgraded to wvdial 1.54 I get "Cannot set information for serial > port" > when I connect via gprs on my usb Motorola phone. No problem if I > downgrade to wvdial 1.53 from stable distribution This bug should be fixed with libwvstreams version 4.0.1-1.3 Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenhe

Bug#294598: marked as done (php4: compilation problem related to apache2 header)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:46:30 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294598: php4: compilation problem related to apache2 header has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

debian-bugs-rc@lists.debian.org

Package: wvdial Version: 1.53.0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of

Bug#294598: php4: compilation problem related to apache2 header

Package: php4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source A dpkg-buildpackage failed with the following message : In file included from /usr/include/apache2/util_filter.h:23, from /usr/local/src/php-mnogo/php4-4.3.10/sapi/apache2handler/mod_php4.c:40: /usr/inc

Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager)

severity 294575 normal thanks On Feb 10, Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to install gnome-volume-manager and it depends on udev but udev did > not > install correctly. Your kernel lacks tmpfs support, but apparently does not behaves like older kernels. Please run these comm

Processed: Re: Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 294575 normal Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager) Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#293207: bogofilter: last two versions caused db errors

> >Can you provide the configuration you use with exim to plug bogofilter > >in? I am particularly interested because version 4.34-10 of exim > >depends on libdb3 and exim 4.44-2 depends on libdb4.2 so I am curious > >to know if exim uses libdb to interface with bogofilter in any way. > > > >micah

Bug#294406: Updated woody packages available

Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi Joey! > > I prepared new PostgreSQL woody packages to fix CAN-2005-024[57], here > is the interdiff: Thanks. Regards, Joey -- GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#294522: A conditional linda profile patch

Hi, I'd rather see that linda stays in main. I have included a patch that makes the usage of the profiler optional. Regards, Bastian -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `- -

Bug#294581: your mail

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:32:05PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Note that offlineimap still thinks its 4.0.8, even though the > package is 4.0.9. Oops. I forgot to bump its version number. Thanks. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Bug#294544: unr

I cannot reproduce this in directories which I do not own. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#294454: marked as done (gnupg 1.4.0 does not work)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gnupg 1.4.0 does not work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#294581: your mail

Note that offlineimap still thinks its 4.0.8, even though the package is 4.0.9. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys?

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 282274 patch Bug#282274: phpdoc: FTBFS: openjade keeps running. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#294271: IDN support allows domain name spoofing

Here is a test which shows the evidence of the problem : http://secunia.com/multiple_browsers_idn_spoofing_test/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager)

Hi Michael, I'm not the udev maintainer, but I can try to help. Can you add "set -x" as the second line of /var/lib/dpkg/info/udev.postinst, and retry configuration of that package, and send us the output? Thanks, Justin On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:36:13PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > Package

Bug#294581: (no subject)

close 294581 merge 294479 294581 merge 294546 294581 thanks I am terribly sorry, my web cache gave me yesterday's bug listing. :( -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do

Bug#294406: Updated woody packages available

Hi Joey! I prepared new PostgreSQL woody packages to fix CAN-2005-024[57], here is the interdiff: http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/psql-woody/postgresql.woody8.diff postgresql (7.2.1-2woody8) stable-security; urgency=low . * Maintainer security upload to fix various vulnerabilities. * s

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 294581 Bug#294581: please fix offlineimap wrt the non-free profile.py in python2.3 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > merge 2

Bug#294581: please fix offlineimap wrt the non-free profile.py in python2.3

Package: offlineimap Version: 4.0.8 Severity: grave Wrt to #293932, please fix offlineimap to use an alternative profiler implementation. offlineimap does not work with python 2.3.5-1 anymore. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'u

Bug#294142: No conditional inclusion?

clone 294142 -1 reopen -1 Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tags -1 - sarge tags -1 + upstream retitle -1 Please add "optional include" functionality to timidity severity -1 wishlist thanks On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > wouldn't it be possible to include the freepats config onl

Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager)

Package: udev Version: 0.050-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I tried to install gnome-volume-manager and it depends on udev but udev did not install correctly. Here's the exact output. It may help to understand what I did and maybe what I did "wrong" ;) Anyway if I did mi

Processed: Re: Bug#294142: No conditional inclusion?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 294142 -1 Bug#294142: timidity can't play anything due to config file Bug 294142 cloned as bug 294578. > reopen -1 Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#294578: timidity can't play anything due to config file Bug reopened, originator set to He

Bug#294546: marked as done (offlineimap: Needs to depend on python2.x-profile)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:24:47 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294546: offlineimap: Needs to depend on python2.x-profile has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#293698: marked as done (missing build-depends)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:02:22 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#293698: fixed in pearpc 0.3.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247)

reopen 294406 tag 294406 woody sarge thanks Sid is now fixed, but Sarge and Woody still need the fix(es). Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc

Processed: Re: Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 294406 Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247) Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tag 294406 woody sarge Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247) Tags were: patch security Tags added: woody, sa

Bug#294454: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work

Hello Hilmar, * Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-10 14:07]: > On 09.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my > > system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But > > if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs

Bug#294522: patch available

tags 294522 + patch thanks https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6401 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: patch available

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 294522 + patch Bug#294522: linda: missing depends on new (and non-free) python-profile Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#294406: marked as done (multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247))

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:02:38 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294406: fixed in postgresql 7.4.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#294493: marked as done (python2.3-twisted: twistd imports removed profile module)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:47:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294493: fixed in twisted 1.3.0-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#293125: marked as done (postgresql: LOAD security issue)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:07:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Woody update was published has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#294467: marked as done (mailman: (CAN-2005-0202) directory traversal vulnerability)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294467: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#291289: marked as done (mailman: need versioned build-depends on dpatch)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#291289: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#294142: No conditional inclusion?

Hello, wouldn't it be possible to include the freepats config only if it exists? Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~k

Bug#262925: progress information

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > Where to look for information about progress on this bug? > My usual approach to find upstream didn't work :-( This bug prevents gfs from entering testing, you have to use unstable. Bastian -- Oblivion together does not frighten

Bug#294513: marked as done (zope-cmfplone: zope-2.7 installe into /usr/lib/zope2.7, plone install into /usr/lib/zope)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:12:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294513: zope-cmfplone: zope-2.7 installe into /usr/lib/zope2.7, plone install into /usr/lib/zope has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#294501: php4: even more info, sorry

Package: php4 Version: 4:4.3.10-3 Followup-For: Bug #294501 Apologies, I've just dug around a bit more, and I've found by disabling the line 'extension=pam_auth.so' from my php4.ini the crash goes away; this may well be a novel bug and not related to this one! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#288882: blender: FTBFS when using sudo

Dear Hatta-san, I'd really really like to see blender 2.35 (and possibly later 2.36) get into Sarge, but the build failures on mips and mipsel so far prevent this, as addressed in Bug#22. I've prepared the attached interdiff, partially following Frank's proposal, which according to my local t

Bug#294501: php4: More information, similar crash

Package: php4 Version: 4:4.3.10-3 Followup-For: Bug #294501 I have an almost identical crash which has started happening as of an update a few days ago. I've removed both php4-pgsql and php4-imap, but the crash remains. I've found that it will crash if I just run the CLI version of php4, as w

Bug#294223: Not reproducible on a fresh install

severity 294223 minor thanks We just checked on another machine which previously did not have xemacs installed. We commented out security.d.o, installed the woody version of xemacs21, readded security.d.o., and the dist-upgrade worked without problems. Despite being able to reproduce this on two m

Processed: Not reproducible on a fresh install

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 294223 minor Bug#294223: xemacs21: Security-Update for Woody fails to install (on alpha) Severity set to `minor'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 23:36 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Yes indeed, since php4-imap is the traditional home for this particular > bug, I'm reassigning. > > Can you send version/dependency information for the php4-imap package > you have installed, and if appropriate, upgrade those packages as

Bug#294517: This is not a serious bug

severity 294517 important thanks Please read http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer before choosing such a high severity. Citing the (english) version: serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer's

Processed: This is not a serious bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 294517 important Bug#294517: wmaker treats multiple instances of same application as one Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#284097: acknowledged by developer (NMU acknowledged)

> From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: NMU acknowledged > > There've been two uploads by the maintainer since the NMUs which fixed > these bugs, including the bugfixes: > > multisync (0.82-4) unstable; urgen

Bug#294546: offlineimap: Needs to depend on python2.x-profile

Package: offlineimap Version: 4.0.8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/offlineimap", line 20, in ? from offlineimap import init File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/init.py", line 19, in ? from offlin

Bug#294544: sfs-server: enables any user to manipulate any file exported from the server, ignoring permissions

Package: sfs-server Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole I created a file owned by root on the sfs server, permissions rw-r--r--. Ran sfskey login to my non-root server account, I was able to remove the file. Tested this for non-root u

Bug#294405: tetex-base: unable to process even a sample file

On 09.02.05 Janusz S. Bien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) writes: Hi, > > Do you mean that the cjk-latex Debian package is broken? Then > > please file a bug against it, with an appropriate severity (if > > it's really unusable, I'd say grave). We do not want to rel

Bug#294405: tetex-base: unable to process even a sample file

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Janusz S. Bien) schrieb: > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:20:25 +0100 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) writes: > > [...] > >> You could have done >> this yourself, by sending your answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > Sorry, I didn't know. No need to apologize. It didn't cause any inconv

Bug#262925: progress information

Hello, Where to look for information about progress on this bug? My usual approach to find upstream didn't work :-( Cheers Geert Stappers -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ apt-get source wget Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Need to get 1335kB of source archives. Get:1 htt

Bug#294454: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work

On 09.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my > system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But > if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption > with this message: > gpg: checking the trustdb > gpg: wait

Bug#285282: marked as done (Missing evolution1 plugin in sarge)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line NMU acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#285113: marked as done (libmultisync-plugin-evolution: While multisync's Evolution 2 support has migrated to sarge, sarge's Evolution is still at 1.4)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line NMU acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#284097: marked as done (libmultisync-plugin-evolution always crashes while synchronizing with evolution-2.0 calendar)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line NMU acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#274455: marked as done (Please add support for Evolution 2.0 in experimental)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line NMU acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#285737: marked as done (libmultisync-plugin-evolution: Multisync Evolution plugin does not recognise Evolution 1.4.6 cal/abook/tasks DB)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line NMU acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#294525: marked as done (kwave_0.7.2-3_arm: FTBFS: build-depends on automake1.7 but calls "aclocal")

Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:02:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294525: fixed in kwave 0.7.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your