Bug#299875: ppp: out-of-memory 30min after "LCP terminated by peer"

2005-03-16 Thread Justin Pryzby
Including a patch from kernel.org. Given the size of the patch, you may not trust it, but that's what I got .. http://www.kernel.org/diff/diffview.cgi?file=%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fv2.6%2Fpatch-2.6.11.4.bz2;z=15 If I understand the situation correctly, this needs to be reassigned and cloned to

Bug#299875: ppp: out-of-memory 30min after "LCP terminated by peer"

2005-03-16 Thread Justin Pryzby
I assume that you have seen this: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.11.4 If not .. tag patch:) In less than 100 lines, even! Justin On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:54:56AM +0100, Christian wrote: > Package: ppp > Version: 2.4.2+20040428-6 > Severity: critical > Justification: b

Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log

2005-03-16 Thread Harald Staub
Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Harald Staub: I tried on one of the servers that has problems, and there, I still have segfaults, while the mentioned cvs version works fine. I attach an strace. Gah. Can you send me - the output of ifconfig - the contents of your ntp.conf Thanks. Cheers Harry eth0

Bug#298600: Patch to fix this problem

2005-03-16 Thread Justin Pryzby
Surely this is not the entire patch? Justin On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:01:29AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote: > tag 298600 + patch > > The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU > that I will be doing shortly. > > --- bzflag-2.0.0.20050118/debian/changelog2005-01-17

Bug#299722: mldonkey-server does not start because of /var/run/mldonkey permissions

2005-03-16 Thread Sylvain LE GALL
Hello, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:12:28PM -0500, Markus Kienast wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Just a question for my personnal information : is there already a > > mldonkey user ? ( because it could explain that mldonkey is running as > > mldonkey:user ). If so, i

Bug#299734: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-03-16 Thread Peter Karlsson
Max Alekseyev: So I believe it will not hard to fix goldedplus for 64-bit system. One just need to carefully inspect parameters of all fseek/lseek/fread/fwrite/etc. calls. If you have any insight into what might cause the problem (especially if you have fixes for them), I would be very happy to

Bug#298600: Patch to fix this problem

2005-03-16 Thread Micah Anderson
tag 298600 + patch The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU that I will be doing shortly. --- bzflag-2.0.0.20050118/debian/changelog 2005-01-17 21:50:09.0 -0600 +++ /tmp/changelog 2005-03-16 23:46:19.503772768 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +bzflag (2.0.0.20

Processed: Patch to fix this problem

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 298600 + patch Bug#298600: copyright file refers to LGPL 2.1, but points to LGPL-2 file There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU Unknown command or malformed arguments to comma

Bug#267236: manpages-zh/cman

2005-03-16 Thread Carlos Z.F. Liu
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:48:44PM +, Qingning Huo wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I didn't know your intension to adopt the package when I offered on > debian-devel today. It seems you are already working on that, while I > don't even know where the latest upstream release is, the links on the > web

Bug#298039: marked as done (xli: Multiple security problems in xli)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:47:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298039: fixed in xli 1.17.0-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade

2005-03-16 Thread OHURA Makoto
Hi. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) Subject: Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:18:52 +0100 > Every time the postinst is called with "configure", be it upon upgrade, > install after remove, or dpkg-reconfigure, the file > /etc/texmf

Bug#299572: init script bug

2005-03-16 Thread Pär Andersson
There is a small mistake in the new package that makes this bug not fully closed. You have missed to add -u $UGID for restart in the init script. Other than that 4.2.0a+stable-6 works fine for me, good work! /Pär --- ntp-server 2005-03-15 23:40:18.0 + +++ ntp-server 2005-03-17 01:29:

Bug#299875: ppp: out-of-memory 30min after "LCP terminated by peer"

2005-03-16 Thread Christian
Package: ppp Version: 2.4.2+20040428-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system hello pppeople, i've encountered serious problems with pppd and days of monitoring the issues lead me to the assumption that pppd is to blame. feel free to tell me otherwise and i'll happily forward t

Bug#299811: marked as done (checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:47:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299811: fixed in checksecurity 2.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#299770: confirm

2005-03-16 Thread Justin Pryzby
I can confirm that this problem exists with a fresh install. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#299865: CAN-2005-0736: Boundary condition error in sys_epoll_wait

2005-03-16 Thread Geoff Crompton
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-13 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole There is a local integer overflow vulnerability in the sys_epoll_wait() call. See following for detail: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12763/ Apologies if already reported. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#298039: this bug is overdue..

2005-03-16 Thread Graham Wilson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:28:42PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > This bug has been marked pending for 8 days. I hope an upload can be > made soon. I've been waiting on the security team to do an upload for stable. However, you are correct. I'll upload the fixed version for unstable this evening. --

Bug#296514: [quanta-devel] Cervisia again, plus greater problems

2005-03-16 Thread Ben Burton
Hi Andras -- thanks very much for your response. Just a technical clarification: > I don't think that using a GPL incompatible KPart in a GPL application > is a problem. It may be at the corner case, but this is more like > writing a GPL frontend to a non-GPL application. I believe the proble

Bug#299857: missing fix for CAN-2005-0385 in unstable

2005-03-16 Thread Joey Hess
Package: luxman Severity: grave Tags: security DSA-693-1 claimed that the security hole CAN-2005-0385 was fixed in unstable in luxman 0.41-20, but it's been two days and I do not see that version has been uploaded. Some details on the hole from the DSA: Kevin Finisterre discovered a buffer

Bug#298039: this bug is overdue..

2005-03-16 Thread Joey Hess
This bug has been marked pending for 8 days. I hope an upload can be made soon. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#296514: [quanta-devel] Cervisia again, plus greater problems

2005-03-16 Thread Andras Mantia
Hi, On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:22, Ben Burton wrote: > It's me writing about Cervisia licensing again. We still haven't > heard back from Bernd Gehrmann at this stage, which means there's not > really much that we can do. I know that Bernd was about to change his job some months ago, but I c

Bug#299846: openslp: Several non-descript buffer overflows and out-of-bounds memory access

2005-03-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: openslp Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole SuSE Security has found several buffer overflows and out-of-memory access possibilities during a code audit. Neither the original SuSE nor the Mandrake advisory contain detailed information, openslp.org lacks usable

Bug#298473: marked as done (fwanalog violates debconf specification)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:31 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298473: fixed in fwanalog 0.6.4-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#299753: marked as done (Broken build-depends)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:15 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299753: fixed in control-center 1:2.8.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.

2005-03-16 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:47:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Yes, please, I cannot reproduce this. Can you please do this? > > # export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer > # apt-get install --reinstall checksecurity Reinstalling works without errors. I did some debugging and came

Bug#296514: Cervisia again, plus greater problems

2005-03-16 Thread Ben Burton
Hi, It's me writing about Cervisia licensing again. We still haven't heard back from Bernd Gehrmann at this stage, which means there's not really much that we can do. AFAICT he hasn't been around for a few years now; does anyone know of a way that we might be able to contact him? I've already

Bug#263979: userv FTBFS

2005-03-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Santiago Vila writes ("Bug#263979: userv FTBFS"): > Alternatively, you could rewrite debian/rules so that it does not use > bashisms. With a little bit of care, debian/rules does not become a > lot longer. (Sorry for the delay replying.) Your patch does make it longer, and I don't think that buil

Bug#299155: libnss-mysql: Causes segfault when running /usr/sbin/adduser

2005-03-16 Thread Mario Lipinski
Hello, i noticed that my email address bounced. This should be fixed now. So the reference to previous mails is lost. Sorry for that. > Hmm, Ok. Could you elaborate a little bit? I can fix the code but I > would need to get some details. Do you know what is wrong? I used the following code to

Bug#299498: Only grave on unstable

2005-03-16 Thread Philipp Frauenfelder
tags 299498 + sid thanks Dear Bruce Am Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:49:41PM + hat Bruce Stephens getippert: > My apologies. I hadn't noticed that this same version is used in > testing, too. Probably the package works fine with the valgrind in > testing, and is only broken in unstable. This is

Processed: Re: Bug#299498: Only grave on unstable

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 299498 + sid Bug#299498: valgrind-callgrind: undefined symbol: vgPlain_register_compact_helper There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Bug#299734: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-03-16 Thread Max Alekseyev
Peter, Actually, the only bad thing I noticed is incorrect file I/O. User interface works pretty fine and stable. So I believe it will not hard to fix goldedplus for 64-bit system. One just need to carefully inspect parameters of all fseek/lseek/fread/fwrite/etc. calls. As of FIDO, it's pretty sti

Bug#299157: aspseek-libmysqldb must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:37:03PM +0100, Jeremiah Foster wrote: > Can you tell me if this project has been orphaned? I cannot reach the > developer, check out from CVS, etc. If it has not been orphaned, may I > orphan it? Orphaning Debian packages is handled through the QA team (debian-qa@lists

Bug#299589: marked as done (per-plugin "group" directive apparently ignored)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:02:54 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299589: fixed in munin 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#297981: marked as done (libapache2-mod-encoding: FTBFS: 'regex_t' undeclared (first use in this function))

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:18:35 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line #297981 was fixed in NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#289362: marked as done (capplets: gnome-settings-daemon dies repeatedly with SIGILL)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289362: fixed in gstreamer0.8 0.8.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#299722: Re : Re: Bug#299722: mldonkey-server does not start because of /var/run/mldonkey permissions

2005-03-16 Thread Sylvain LE GALL
Hello, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:15:48AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Hello, > > > >On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:11:00PM -0500, elias humbolt wrote: > >> Package: mldonkey-server > >> Version: 2.5.28-2 > >> Severity: grave > >> Justification: renders package unusable > >> > >> > >> > >> --

Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Harald Staub: > I tried on one of the servers that has problems, and there, I still have > segfaults, while the mentioned cvs version works fine. I attach an strace. > Gah. Can you send me - the output of ifconfig - the contents of your ntp.conf Thanks. -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} I

Bug#299814: GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys

2005-03-16 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Package: gnupg Version: 1.2.5-3 Severity: grave Tags: woody, sarge, patch Hi. GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys (e.g. for my key in the debian keyring). Thus, data is encrypted irreversible, i.e. lost. When discussed on debian-private in February, I was encouraged to file this bug. Accord

Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.

2005-03-16 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
tags 299811 moreinfo unreproducible thanks > I tried to install checksecurity today, and this is what I got: (...) > Unpacking checksecurity (from .../checksecurity_2.0.7-2_all.deb) ... > Setting up checksecurity (2.0.7-2) ... > dpkg: error processing checksecurity (--configure): > subprocess po

Bug#299811: checksecurity bug

2005-03-16 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:21:34PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I was able to upgrade then purge, then reinstall sid's new > checksecurity. So, I think it would be useful if you could make the > postinst set -x and reconfigure it to point out where the problem is. That might work too, but I sugg

Processed: Re: Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 299811 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly. Tags were: sid Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#299183: streamtuner workaround

2005-03-16 Thread Ari Pollak
Just as an aside, if you want to get streamtuner working again without waiting for an update, you can disable the python plugin by running the following and trying to start streamtuner again: echo /usr/lib/streamtuner/plugins/python.so >> ~/.streamtuner/disabled-plugins -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Bug#265045: conflict

2005-03-16 Thread Justin Pryzby
Couldn't you just use Replaces: unrar-nonfree? I'm not sure I understand this bug report though; are there two packages with the same name? Is there meant to be a seamless upgrade from unrar (nonfree) to unrar (free)? In that case, why can't one of the just be renamed? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#299811: checksecurity bug

2005-03-16 Thread Justin Pryzby
I was able to upgrade then purge, then reinstall sid's new checksecurity. So, I think it would be useful if you could make the postinst set -x and reconfigure it to point out where the problem is. Thanks, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Processed: tagging 299811

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 299811 sid Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly. There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.

2005-03-16 Thread Uwe Hermann
Package: checksecurity Version: 2.0.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I tried to install checksecurity today, and this is what I got: # apt-get install checksecurity Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Suggested packages: apt-watch cron-apt R

Bug#299155: libnss-mysql: Causes segfault when running /usr/sbin/adduser

2005-03-16 Thread Guillaume Morin
Quoting Mario Lipinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Package: libnss-mysql > Version: 0.43-2 > Followup-For: Bug #299155 > > i can confirm this bug and was able to track this down to a fault in > the > function getpwnam called by the adduser script. > the function getgrnam shows same behaviour. > > i am

Bug#299807: omniORB potentially vulnerable against DoS

2005-03-16 Thread W. Borgert
Package: libomniorb4 Version: 4.0.5-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch In case of setting serverCallTimeOutPeriod in /etc/omniORB4.cfg or by command line, omniORB does not honour the timeout which leads to inaccessibility of any server application, if too many client connections are not closed by the c

Bug#267236: manpages-zh/cman

2005-03-16 Thread Qingning Huo
Hi Carlos, I didn't know your intension to adopt the package when I offered on debian-devel today. It seems you are already working on that, while I don't even know where the latest upstream release is, the links on the website [1] are broken. Where did you get the release? So, I will do nothin

Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log

2005-03-16 Thread Harald Staub
Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Beat Bolli: Package: ntp-server Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4 Followup-For: Bug #299572 Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem. People: If you're stracing a server, use "strace -f -s 300 -o FILE PROGRAM", then send FILE as a (possibly gzipped) attachment unless

Bug#299589: munin-node: same problem with other plugins

2005-03-16 Thread Charles Fry
Package: munin-node Version: 1.2.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #299589 I am experiencing the same problem with other plugins, specifically courier_mta_mailqueue is not being run as the specified user, and thus lacks the permission to access the directory it needs to process. Charles -- System Informatio

Bug#298957: marked as done (gem: contains non-free fonts)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:47:03 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298957: fixed in gem 1:0.90.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log

2005-03-16 Thread Beat Bolli
Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Beat Bolli: Package: ntp-server Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4 Followup-For: Bug #299572 Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem. Yes. It has been running without problems for a few minutes now. Hey, and I even found out about incoming.debian.org! People: If you'r

Bug#299157: aspseek-libmysqldb must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12

2005-03-16 Thread Jeremiah Foster
Hey there, Can you tell me if this project has been orphaned? I cannot reach the developer, check out from CVS, etc. If it has not been orphaned, may I orphan it? Thanks, Jeremiah Steve Langasek wrote: Package: aspseek-libmysqldb Version: 1.2.10-1.1 Severity: grave Packages connected to apach

Bug#299328: streamtuner: Confirmation of this bug

2005-03-16 Thread Ron Johnson
Package: streamtuner Version: 0.99.99-3 Followup-For: Bug #299328 The last time I ran streamtuner was about 2 weeks ago, and it ran fine then. I did do a "weekly upgrade" in the mean-time, though. $ gdb streamtuner GNU gdb 6.3-debian [snip] This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...(no debugg

Processed: Wrong severity

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 299560 normal Bug#299560: dsniff: fails due to not finding libnids Severity set to `normal'. > tags 299560 + pending Bug#299560: dsniff: fails due to not finding libnids There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > stop Stopping processing h

Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Beat Bolli: > Package: ntp-server > Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4 > Followup-For: Bug #299572 Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem. People: If you're stracing a server, use "strace -f -s 300 -o FILE PROGRAM", then send FILE as a (possibly gzipped) attachment unless you're very sure

Bug#267236: cman: source package name confict!

2005-03-16 Thread Carlos Z.F. Liu
Thanks. I'm not a DD, but I'm willing to adopt this package. The upstream translation team have released several new versions, and I need to seperate it into 4 binary packages or more. I'm quite busy now, and this work is a bit time consuming. So, I can't guarantee when it will be done. Again, tha

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libapache2-mod-encoding 20040616-4

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 297981 + fixed Bug#297981: libapache2-mod-encoding: FTBFS: 'regex_t' undeclared (first use in this function) Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#287550: marked as done (ngspice: FTBFS: Has i386 binaries in source.)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:02:48 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ngspice removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#287347: marked as done (ngspice: legal issue)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:02:48 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ngspice removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#240546: marked as done (libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:09:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#299155: libnss-mysql: Causes segfault when running /usr/sbin/adduser

2005-03-16 Thread Mario Lipinski
Package: libnss-mysql Version: 0.43-2 Followup-For: Bug #299155 i can confirm this bug and was able to track this down to a fault in the function getpwnam called by the adduser script. the function getgrnam shows same behaviour. i am experiencing the problem a long time now and looking forward to

Bug#299748: marked as done (Please remove ngspice; it is not distributable)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:41 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299748: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#299572: marked as done (ntp-server: Fails to start after upgrade.)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:02:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299572: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#272364: marked as done (Please update to 2.6.8)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:06:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#293759: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: Please remove source package gtkglareamm)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:56:35 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#293770: marked as done (gltt: to be removed)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#293769: marked as done (libproplist: to be removed)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:36 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#296732: marked as done (3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#290111: marked as done (digikamplugins: FTBFS: Cannot find headers)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:05:28 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#290111: digikamplugins: FTBFS: Cannot find headers

2005-03-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Achim Bohnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-18 15:43]: > As I tried to explain in my last msg, I would like to upload a dummy > digikamplugins pkg, that just depends on kipi-plugins as 'soon' as > kipi-plugins enters sid (currently still pending in NEW queue). > That's just to smooth upgrade. Some

Bug#197593: marked as done (gtkglareamm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libglu-dev)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:56:35 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#241112: marked as done (Please remove distributed-net-pproxy.)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#293758: marked as done (Package superseded and scheduled for removal (#282554))

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:53:59 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line mysqlcc removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Processed: tagging 291408

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 291408 fixed-in-experimental Bug#291408: [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Processed: retitle 291408 to [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 291408 [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption Bug#291408: slapd: Index and Data corruption with openldap2 2.1.30 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#299770: nuauth: Installation fails

2005-03-16 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Package: nuauth Version: 0.8.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Setting up nuauth (0.8.5-3) ... chown: cannot access `/var/run/nuauth/': No such file or directory I don't know if it works for systems where some another nufw package is previously unpakced/installed/run, bu

Bug#299772: qmailadmin does not work correctly, but a rebuild is sufficient to fix it

2005-03-16 Thread Alessandro Polverini
Package: qmailadmin Version: 1.0.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I installed the package and used it to modify domains. It was half-working because, for example: - qmailadmin searched for the wrong Maildir, for example "Postmaster/Maildir" instead of "postmaste

Bug#299744: marked as done (broken package, gimp depends on gimp-data (= 2.2.4-1))

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:07:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299744: broken package, gimp depends on gimp-data (= 2.2.4-1) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: severity of 299731 is important

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > severity 299731 important Bug#299731: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp: SMP kernel causes krenele panic during boot Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: severity of 299717 is important

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > severity 299717 important Bug#299717: hal: Install-time script cranks mixer up while soundcard is in use Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Processed: Re: kernel-source-2.6.8: race which could allow for privilege escalation on Radeon

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297203 pending Bug#297203: kernel-source-2.6.8: race which could allow for privilege escalation on Radeon Tags were: security Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Processed: tagging 299702

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 299702 sid Bug#299702: hugs shouldn't go into sarge yet There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Processed: tagging 299709

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 299709 sid Bug#299709: digikam: Fails to install depenant on libexif1 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Processed: tagging 299651

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 299651 sid Bug#299651: ippl postinst stalls upgrade. Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#299731: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp: SMP kernel causes krenele panic during boot

2005-03-16 Thread Matt Taggart
Aprotim Sanyal writes..., > Tested on both testing and unstable. On my (old) dual-P3 system (Asus CUV4X- > D), booting the SMP kernels for 2.6.8 or 2.6.10 causes a hand on boot, > with the message "Kernel panic: attempted to kill init!" shortly after printi > ng out some IDE bud information. N

Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade

2005-03-16 Thread Frank Küster
Package: jadetex Version: 3.13-3.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Violates policy 10.7.3 Every time the postinst is called with "configure", be it upon upgrade, install after remove, or dpkg-reconfigure, the file /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf is restored. If the file is deleted or

Bug#299475: amule: Bug solved

2005-03-16 Thread Ciro Mattia Gonano
Package: amule Version: 1.2.6+rc8-2 Followup-For: Bug #299475 apt-get reinstalling the package and/or reconfiguring preferences solved the problem. Still wondering what the problem were, anyway :) You can close the bug - thanks for all the fish! -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT pr

Bug#299125: marked as done (libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299125: libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Processed: [ach@mpe.mpg.de: Bug#299709: digikam: Fails to install]

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 299709 digikam: Fails to install depenant on libexif1 Bug#299709: digikam: Fails to install Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato