Package: scim
Version: 1.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 5.6.9.
Dear maintainer(s),
I knew only one DD for help uploading package is not enought, and I
am very appreciate that he has done so much for scim package.
I hope more DD will stand up for helping on pkg-ime pro
Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:07:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300672: vim-doc: fails to install because of
/usr/share/doc/vim/copyright
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
[ Dimanche 20 Mars 2005 16:51 ]
| By expicitly making the fourth argument of
| DefineParameters in /usr/include/arpack++/arlsnsym.h (line
| 144, IIRC) as an address(by preceding it with a "&") made
| the compiler happy. Here is the relevant portion I have in
| this file now which compiles okay:
Hi
Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:24:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line NMU incorporated in 1.10-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 300684 sid
Bug#300684: siproxd_1:0.5.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Package: vim-doc
Version: 1:6.3-064+1
Followup-For: Bug #300672
w ;apt-get update ;apt-get -u upgrade ;apt-get clean ;w
06:23:11 up 2 days, 1:17, 3 users, load average: 1.89, 1.74, 1.40
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
arnt :0 -Sat0
Package: siproxd
Version: 1:0.5.10-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of siproxd_1:0.5.10-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050321-0349
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends
* Don Alexander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> >
> >Very odd. Have you tried moving your profile directory out of the way?
> >Any extensions installed?
> >
You didn't answer my second question, any extension installed (in the
profile dir or as a debian package)?
> I did one
Package: realtime-lsm
Severity: serious
The way this package is built is not accepteble. Please fix the build
system to something that works with just dpkg-buildpackage.
--Jeroen
- Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:41:43 +0100
From: Ma
Package: oprofile-source
Severity: serious
The way this package is built is not accepteble. Please fix the build
system to something that works with just dpkg-buildpackage.
--Jeroen
- Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:41:43 +0100
From:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:33:29AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Can you please update to a more recent version of 2.6.8 and retest?
>
> Which one ? I don't know of anything newer than 2.6.8-13 ...
>
> (I was using -13 as I reported in my mail)
Sorry, I missread your mail and thought you wer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 300672 sid
Bug#300672: vim-doc: fails to install because of /usr/share/doc/vim/copyright
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 07:22:02PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
[...]
>
> Rhythmbox uses GStreamer, if you can starve Rhythmbox reading your stream
> in the way you starved amarok, and amarok crashes, but not
> Rhythmbox, it is most probably an amarok bug of course.
>
> Could you try to clarify
Package: kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm
Version: 20031211
Severity: grave
kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm is unusable because the corresponding source package,
kernel-source-2.4.19, is no longer available in testing or unstable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Package: vim-doc
Version: 1:6.3-067+1
Severity: serious
Justification: uknown
Unpacking vim-doc (from .../vim-doc_1%3a6.3-067+1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-doc_1%3a6.3-067+1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/vim/copyright', which is also
Eric Dorland wrote:
Very odd. Have you tried moving your profile directory out of the way?
Any extensions installed?
I did one better, I created a new user just for the purpose of testing
firefox, a virgin profile if you will. Still the same, though the
official release from mozilla
(Mozilla/5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300614 sarge sid upstream
Bug#300614: kmail: deletes emails when manually applying a filter for all
messages in inbox manually
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, sid, upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Marcin Orlowski said:
>
> I can confirm there's something wrong with this version of the module.
> phpmyadmin causes
>
> Mon Mar 21 01:52:31 2005] [notice] child pid 8778 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11
Do you have any other mysql-linked packages installed that get loaded into
apache's memory
Package: libapache-mod-php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-9
Followup-For: Bug #299605
I false reported latest phpmyadmin works. It does not and
crashes same way older version used to. need to do some more
chckes as some form-fills 'works' while others causes
segfault
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300632: fixed in tuxpaint 1:0.9.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: libapache-mod-php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-9
Followup-For: Bug #299605
It shall be mentioned that it does not occur with every version
of phpmyadmin. Crashes appear with 2.5.6rc2 - the latest 2.6.1-pl3
works
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50
Tags: sarge sid upstream
H, I think this is the same as http://bugs.debian.org/281628
Though I'm kinda surprised to see it, I thought it had been fixed in
3.3.2... Actually, I haven't seen it lately, even though I haven't
upgraded yet. Also, it never caused any data loss for me.
Cheers,
K
Package: libapache-mod-php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-9
Followup-For: Bug #299605
I can confirm there's something wrong with this version of the module.
phpmyadmin causes
Mon Mar 21 01:52:31 2005] [notice] child pid 8778 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11
while trying to execute phpmyadmin's search que
severity 300623 wishlist
merge 298814 300623
thanks
This is NOT a grave bug. I refer you to
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
This bug is at nighest severity a normal bug, and this type is usually
wishlist. It has also been reported as bug #298814.
--
Michael Janssen --- Jamu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 300662 sid
Bug#300662: qalculate: New version depend on experimental version of library
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 300623 wishlist
Bug#300623: bittorrent 4.0 is out
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> merge 298814 300623
Bug#298814: bittorrent: New upstream version available
Bug#300623: bittorrent 4.0 is out
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Valu
Package: qalculate
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
The new 0.7.2-2 version of qalculate depends on libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.9.0).
However, this version of the library only exists in experimental.
Please rebuilt in a pbuilder or pure unstable environment.
Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Carlos
-
tags 300600 pending
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 07:01:27PM +0100, Falk Hueffner muttered these words:
> Package: xsupplicant
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> xsupplicant 1.0.1-3 fails to build on m68k, arm and alpha:
>
> [...]
> Working on: /build/buildd/
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:21:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297664: junit: FTBFS: gjdoc errors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:02:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300637: fixed in rails 0.10.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 300600 - sid
Bug#300600: xsupplicant 1.0.1-3(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: Tries do download stuff
while building
Tags were: sid pending
Tags removed: sid
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 300600 sid
Bug#300600: xsupplicant 1.0.1-3(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: Tries do download stuff
while building
Tags were: pending
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 300598 sid
Bug#300598: strace 4.5.9-1(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: O_LARGEFILE undeclared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300600 pending
Bug#300600: xsupplicant 1.0.1-3(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: Tries do download stuff
while building
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
> I find detection of presense of a header file like that a stupid
> way. It should not rely on those defines.
>
> The proper way to do this would be to have a configure script
> that could then give an error message.
I agree. I have recommended this to upstream, and will deal with this
problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Package: lingoteach-ui,lingoteach-lesson,lingoteach-sound
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> retitle 279702 ITA: lingoteach-ui,lingoteach-lesson,lingoteach-sound
Bug#279702: dummy bug to keep the lingoteach packages out of sarge
Chang
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:03:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dupe
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: rails
Version: 0.10.1-6
Severity: grave
The depends line seems to have disappeared from the latest rails:
$apt-cache show rails
Package: rails
Priority: optional
Section: web
Installed-Size: 7248
Maintainer: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Version: 0.10.1-6
Recommends: i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> unmerge 300520
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved to /usr/include/pppd/
Bug is not marked as being merged with any others.
> reopen 300520
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 300520 sid
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved to /usr/include/pppd/
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
> reassign 300520 libppd-dev
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h move
* Don Alexander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I can also confirm this occurs for me too using:
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050306
> Firefox/1.0.1 (Debian package 1.0.1-2)
>
> However I notice the history list has disappeared and also that if I
> press any arrow
Package: limewire
Version: 3.4.5-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Secunia reports two vulnerabilities in Limewire that allow attackers remote
access to arbitrary files. For full details see
http://secunia.com/advisories/14555
Note: Limewire has been orphaned for
Package: tuxpaint
Version: 1:0.9.14-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is no longer building problem. I get the following error:
...Compiling Tux Paint from source...
src/tuxpaint.c:176:2: #error
"---"
src/tuxpaint.c:177:2: #error "If you insta
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 22:01 +0200, Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
> Package: muine
> Version: 0.6.3-7
> Followup-For: Bug #300541
>
> I am experiencing the same problem. It appears that I can't even downgrade
> easily because the version in testing is the same as in unstable.
There is no version of
Package: php4-snmp
Version: 4:4.3.10-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
We noticed this happening every sunday during the daily logrotate but
were not able to pin it down until now. When apache gets send a SIGHUP
to reload the logfiles it segfaults due to trying to dealloca
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:02:55 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285178: fixed in siproxd 1:0.5.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: bittorrent
Version: 3.4.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Bittorrent 4.0 is out, 3.4 is garbage in comparison.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3
Loc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 298173 - pending
Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (=< 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is
released
Tags were: pending woody sarge security
Tags removed: pending
>
End of messa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 298173 - sid
Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (=< 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is
released
Tags were: pending woody sid sarge security
Tags removed: sid
>
End of message,
Package: hat
Version: 2.02-11
Severity: serious
Hi,
When trying to build hat, I get the following error:
hmake -hc=ghc6 -package lang -d
/usr/src/hat-2.02/debian/build-tools/targets/ix86-Linux/obj/hattrans -I.
-I../compiler98 HatTrans
hmake is not installed/configured for ix86-Linux.
See y
Package: muine
Version: 0.6.3-7
Followup-For: Bug #300541
I am experiencing the same problem. It appears that I can't even downgrade
easily because the version in testing is the same as in unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:48:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299155: fixed in libnss-mysql 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:38:49PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand your bug report.
ok.
explanations follow
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:24:20PM +0100, Artur Górniak wrote:
> >I am getting errors 101 and 2 resulting in system reboot when trying to
> 101 is "network unreach
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:03:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300240: fixed in qalculate 0.7.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-2
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
After definig a new filter, I pressed CTRL+A to mark all messages in Inbox,
then I pressed CTRL+J to apply a filter manually.
After that the Kmail window got white, nothing was going anymore. The
programm
Argh. I build all my packages in pbuilder myself before uploading, but I
didn't try to redirect the output...
Thanks for noticing, I'm on it.
Mt.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 02:11:12PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Package: po4a
> Version: 0.20-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> building the packag
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:25:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294003: fixed in lasso 0.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:25:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294003: fixed in lasso 0.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
clone 298967 -1
reassign -1 bglibs
retitle -1 bglibs: NMU is not for sarge
close 298967
quit
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:18:17AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > Hi Micah, while I appreciate your efforts, this NMU unfortunately was
> > unnecessary, the current bglibs packages in sarge are fine.
> I
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005, Christian Henz wrote:
>
> Rhythmbox does not seem to suffer from the memory problem, but I could
> not really tell if it was actually using gst or xine for streaming...
> (since amarok/xine works too). I could not get Muine to run.
Rhythmbox uses GStreamer, if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 298967 -1
Bug#298967: bglibs-doc: contains non-free font
Bug 298967 cloned as bug 300605.
> reassign -1 bglibs
Bug#300605: bglibs-doc: contains non-free font
Bug reassigned from package `bglibs-doc' to `bglibs'.
> retitle -1 bglibs: NMU is not f
Package: xsupplicant
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
xsupplicant 1.0.1-3 fails to build on m68k, arm and alpha:
[...]
Working on: /build/buildd/xsupplicant-1.0.1/doc/xml-userguide/userguide.xml
openjade:/build/buildd/xsupplicant-1.0.1/doc/xml-userguide/userguide.xml:
Package: strace
Version: 4.5.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
strace 4.5.9-1 doesn't build on ia64 and alpha:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -Ilinux/alpha -I../linux/alpha -Ilinux
-I../linux -Wall -g -O2 -MT file.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/file.Tpo" -c -o file.
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:53:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298173: RC bugs for sylpheed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
severity 300240 serious
thanks
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:13:01AM -0600, ctl (jetscreamer) wrote:
> Unpacking qalc (from .../archives/qalc_0.7.2-1_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qalc_0.7.2-1_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/qalc', which is al
tags 294604 - sid
thanks
Hi Justin,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:56:47 -0500
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that #294604 can be closed, and #298173 can be tag =
> sarge,woody,security. Correct?
Yep, seems so. Also the #294807 can be closed. Thanks for reminding ;)
> BTW: I
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:32:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300556: fixed in glabels 2.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294604 - sid
Bug#294604: sylpheed: Please remove aspell-dictionary relationship
Tags were: patch pending sid
Tags removed: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Sorry, I don't understand your bug report.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:24:20PM +0100, Artur GÃrniak wrote:
>I am getting errors 101 and 2 resulting in system reboot when trying to
101 is "network unreachable", 2 means "no such file". Neither one should
be a possible return value for a memory check
Please, please! send your reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, or
at least not only to me!
Jean-Jacques Rétorré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster a écrit :
>> Jean-Jacques Rétorré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Frank Küster a écrit :
>>>
Jean-Jacques,
>>>
> [snip]
>>>Byte compile
Hi,
It seems that #294604 can be closed, and #298173 can be tag =
sarge,woody,security. Correct?
BTW: I noticed a strange version numbering in the experimental
packages. Is this intentional? It seems to me that people who had
installed the experimental versions would have to actively force the
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 03:15:24PM +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Package: mldonkey-server
> Version: 2.5.28-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Sylvain,
>
> thank you for your work to package mldonkey-server. downloads.ini is created
> with permi
I don't seem to be able to replicate this bug on sarge, with gjdoc
0.6.1-14 and junit 3.8.1.1-2. I wonder if the "sarge" tag Steve Langasek
added is actually appropriate. If not, the bug should be possible to
close, since it is fixed in sid already.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:17:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#192189: fixed in luxman 0.41-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:17:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299857: fixed in luxman 0.41-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Okay. Do I correctly understand that kernel patch + downgrade solves
> your problem?
i don't even have to patch the kernel. i tried with 2.6.11-rc5-bk2, same
thing. but (only!) downgrading ppp_2.4.2 (current is ppp_2.4.3) did the trick.
> And, if you have *just* the kernel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 299922 + security confirmed
Bug#299922: mailscanner: lock/pid file location violates fhs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security, confirmed
>
End of message, stopping proce
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300587 sarge
Bug#300587: lirc-modules-source: does not compile with 2.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
By expicitly making the fourth argument of
DefineParameters in /usr/include/arpack++/arlsnsym.h (line
144, IIRC) as an address(by preceding it with a "&") made
the compiler happy. Here is the relevant portion I have in
this file now which compiles okay:
//**
template
in
On Mar 20, Christian Kujau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - pppd tries to re-establish the connection, says "Starting link" in the
> logfile [1] and then just hangs.
Weird. Maybe you hit something like #298657 and the other similar bugs.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.6.6-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
make-kpkg gives the following error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc'
sed -e "s!\$KVERS!2.6.8!g; s!\$KSRC!/usr/src/linux!; s!\$KARCH!i386!; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; s!\$KMAINT!Unk
hey folks,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:33:52PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> sean finney wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:39:10AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > > Wasn't it the one where a privilege granted to "table_name" also grants
> > > rights on "tableXname", "tableYname" as '_' was
Hello
On 2005-03-20 sean finney wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:33:52PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > sean finney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:39:10AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > > > Wasn't it the one where a privilege granted to "table_name" also
> > > > grants rights on
Okay. Do I correctly understand that kernel patch + downgrade solves
your problem?
And, if you have *just* the kernel patch, /usr/sbin/pppd hangs, but
doesn't crash the system?
Thanks,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:03:05 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300543: libruby1.8: missing replaces/conflicts on rubyunit
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 01:19:04PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Package: libgnumail-java
> Version: 1.0-3.1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> building the package libgnumail-java in a clean build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
>
> ===
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:47:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299481: fixed in apt-build 0.11.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 300556 glabels: FTBFS: Fails to install during packaging.
Bug#300556: glabels
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:32:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300113: fixed in hotplug 0.0.20040329-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on various arches because the
libical directory is using a very old version of libtool (1.3.4).
Please update that to the latest version.
It's also trying to make a shared lib
hi again,
sorry for the delay, but the "bug" triggers only when the remote peer
disconnects me - and it does it only once a day.
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> reassign 299875 kernel
> retitle 299875 CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
> tag 299875 patch security
yes, it really looks like a "p
Package: mldonkey-server
Version: 2.5.28-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Sylvain,
thank you for your work to package mldonkey-server. downloads.ini is created
with permissions for the group users to write the file
and thus change the admin password, this shou
Package: glabels
Version: 2.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build in some arches. From the buildd logs:
make install-data-hook
make[5]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/glabels-2.0.2/data/mime'
/usr/bin/update-mime-database
"/build/buildd/glabels-2.0.2/debian/t
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:07:03PM -0500, David I. Lehn wrote:
> * Christian Henz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-17T07:42:41-0500]:
> > After upgrading the gstreamer lib/plugins, amarok
> > ate all available memory (top showed 688MB Virt. before it
> > starved). At that point I had listened to some l
Package: libruby1.8
Version: 1.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace libruby1.8 1.8.2-2 (using .../libruby1.8_1.8.2-3_i386.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement libruby1.8 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libruby1.8_1.8.2-3_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ru
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:47:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296130: fixed in libdc0 0.3.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: muine
Version: 0.6.3-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
As of the last dist-upgrade, I can't seem to start muine. An error
window appears that contains the message
| An error occurred:
|
| Failed to initialize the audio backend:
| Could not find the volume element
Package: libgnumail-java
Version: 1.0-3.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libgnumail-java in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
fi ; \
done ; \
fi
make[1]
Jonas Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Sun, Mar 20, 2005:
> Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Sun, Mar 20, 2005:
> > Package: elinks
> > Followup-For: Bug #296976
> >
> > #296976 is marked as serious against elinks. However, it seems to me
> > that it's just the sgml2x package not using the rig
Package: hunit
Version: 1.0-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package hunit in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the pack
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
